User talk:Modern primat/arşivistan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

feragatname: buraya kendi kullanıcı mesaj sayfamdan istediğimi koyarım. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Modern primat!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


(cevaplanan için: User_talk:Modern_primat#Birkaç_konuda_notlar modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC))[reply]

kimse sınanmadığı günahın masumu değildir kadı. sana ana avrat sövseler, ağızlarından sular akarcasına öldürmekle tehdit etseler... naparsın? hele bunun kur'an'ın ürünleri tarafından, yani zaten kitapta beni yoketmek isteyen kitaptan dolayı, -ki bunun "kişisel sinir" olarak değerlendirilmemesi için yazdım, nefretle yapılsa? daha da beteri, bu ürünleri şikayet edersen, bunu isminle cisminle etinle butunla yapsan; sabahın beşinde "gardaş sen muhammet'e sövmüşsün, seni aras kargo ile götürceğiz şimdi" diyerekten gelen "halkın polisine" nasıl bakacağım? bütün bunlar dahilinde ben karşımdakine neden sövmeyim eğer bunu yaparsa? bana zarar verme güdüsüne karşı ne yapmam lazım??!!
yine de belirtmek isterim ki farklı mecralarda yapılan dinî tartışmalarda, ölüm tehditi de dahil, sövme sayma varsa ve onun içinde en ufak dahi tartışma isteği varsa sövmemeyi deniyorum. bunu karşımdakinin beni tehdit olarak görmeyip, yumuşaması için ve uygar tartışma için...
-
vikimedya içinse hiçbir şekilde sövmem, hakaret etmem. imayı da yanlışlıkla yaparım eğer yaparsam.
EK NOT: bunu vp:kürsü sayarsanız kalbimi kırarsınız. sayın kadı ansiklopedi geliştirme amacıyla mı("hakaret ettiğimden" yazıetmiş, bana vikimedyada sövgümü ve hakaretimi gösterin. bunun veya en azından bir bölümün viki dışı ile ilgili tartışma olduğu açık) yazdı sanki bunu? ve ben de bunu ansiklopedi geliştirme amacıyla mı yazıyorum? ikisi de aynı çuvala konmalıdır. herkese esenlikler diliyorum. müslümanlar kardeşimdir. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-

File:Atlantis AVM ve Batımerkez İstasyonunun önünde, "allah yok" grafitisi, modern primat dondurmasıyla poz veriyor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emreoyun (talk) 10:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlantis AVM ve Batımerkez İstasyonunun önünde, "allah yok" grafitisi, modern primat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emreoyun (talk) 10:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request of COM:VRT

[edit]

I note you have added "no permission since" templates to several users' files. We usually trust users when they claim "own work" for files not of extraordinary quality and not published formerly elsewhere on the internet. The VRT procedure is for professional photographers and cases where there is significant doubt about the uploader being the author.

There is a serious backlog in the VRT queues, so asking uploaders to go through the VRT process for ordinary uploads is unhelpful, and the template is very confusing in these cases. Also, 7 days is a very short time to produce evidence for older uploads – there is no requirement of checking one's Commons' user talk page daily, not even monthly or at all.

Please restrict these templates to where there is reason to believe the upload is a copyright violation, and please provide some reasoning on why you think so. Missing Exif or moderate resolution are not in themselves reason to suspect copyright violations.

LPfi (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LPfi was my marking work rulebreaking? it is not. if it is show me please. commons is not like other places. if you not coming here "not even monthly" then why you uploading photos in first place? and even this doesnt support your comment about this? files can be undeleted as they getting deleted. just contact VRT and thats all, or starting regular deletion request in the beginning. also i mark new files too; if people uploading files and immediatly after they leave and dont come back for months, what we should do?
""7 days is a very short time"" discuss about it in village pump, dont tell me.
copyvio and VRT markings are not same. if there is copyvio i put there URL or "all rights reserved" thing of source.
almost all my VRT markings are about low res, no metadata images. and if user dont telling about this in file description or their userpage, how can we sure it is free licensed? look, it is not hard to contact VRT. im gonna do what i do. @LPfi ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On COM:VRT:
"If any of the following statements is one you could make with regard to the file you wish to upload, you do not need to contact VRT:
[...]
  • I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright.
    Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted."
Routinely adding requests for COM:VRT is against the spirit of this. The VRT page says you don't need to contact them, and then they get this ugly template.
Many people log in on Commons only occasionally, to upload a batch of images, or upload one when working on an article on Wikipedia. I may ask somebody to create an account for uploading a few files, to avoid the VRT bureaucracy – and thus not add to the VRT backlog. They may never log in a second time, and regulars may die. They should be able to trust that their contributions stay unless there was some problem (asking about permission the first week is much better than doing it later; uploaders should check that there were no problems with their upload).
Not everybody here is a regular. Those that aren't may be scared off by accusations of not having permission, and they mostly won't go to COM:Undeletion requests – if they don't understand the reason an image was deleted, they cannot contest the deletion, and outside the WMF projects, most things that are deleted cannot be restored.
I for one strip my photos of Exif information before uploading, for privacy reasons (I am a bit ashamed I haven't taken the time to make a script that removes just the problematic parts, but I suppose the important info goes to the information template anyway). I also often reduce resolution to remove noise, or by cropping. Every now and then they go down to the ca 1000x1000px of some of the photos you request VRT for. I don't have any system through which I would be able to easily find the originals of older uploads, so I am at the mercy of Commons procedures (and the trust I assume I have got during my time here and at Wikipedia).
LPfi (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kostas Barkas image

[edit]

Dear Modern primat,

From my knowledge, I have already included permission information for this image, which is a photograph of mine.

Please, have a look at the relavant discussion here, and advise me accordingly.

Best wishes, Nikos, (Actia Nicopolis (talk) 05:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC))[reply]

@Actia Nicopolis hello. it seems @LPfi informed you in your user talk page. you should just follow the instructions written in there: Template:File permission/en. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Modern primat.
I have sent an email already to permitions, after LPfi's message.
I hope the matter will be resolved.
Best wishes
Nikos
Actia Nicopolis (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions to post photos to Wikimedia

[edit]

Hi, I'd like to post some photos of electoral rallies for the 2018 and 2022 elections in Italy, but I don't have the necessary permissions. If I want to publish a photo published online by a newspaper or news agency, do I have to write an email to ask their permission? And how should I set up the email? Thanks in advance! Scia Della Cometa (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scia_Della_Cometa#File_tagging_File:Giorgia_Meloni_election_rally_(2022).webp follow the instructions here.
or if you didnt understand, ask about it here: COM:HD ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Scia Della Cometa files should be free licensed. so, you must contact copyright holder for uploading. but if you are the copyright holder you dont need anything, just upload most original version.
you can set email in here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I'll try to get the permission from the publishers of the photos.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]