User talk:Milliot
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Orgullomoore 20:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 21:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 21:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --The files are available from www.tarisio.com and are available for public access. Milliot
Image Tagging Image:Carlo_Bisiach_sketch_portrait.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Carlo_Bisiach_sketch_portrait.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 18:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
I have made the appropriate changes: This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired. This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years. User:Milliot 19 March 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Bisiach Leandro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 16:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the typo. The error has been corrected. Please enjoy the photo, it goes rather well with the biography of one of the most influential figures in Violin Making (of the 20th century). Milliot 24 march 2007
Vuillaume violin
[edit]HI, do you can communicate in french or german ? -- Frinck51 18:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
English, French not German.I am happy to communicate with you. Please understand what has been said about your photo Frinck51, of the violin. It really is not a good representation of the work of J.B. Vuillaume and should not be used to represent his work on his page(s). User:Milliot 25 March 2007 à 21:10 (CEST)
Image deletion warning | Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1860 back "Le Messie" Stradivarius copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 06:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1860 scroll "Le Messie" Stradivarius copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 06:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1860 top "Le Messie" Strad copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 06:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Igino Sderci photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 09:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Gaetano Sgarabotto in his workshop 1929.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 09:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I have explained myself to you in the page that you have set for deletions.Please read carefully what I have explained, and stop this obsessive hounding for no reason. I am the author of the photos which I have marked as made by: Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Gaetano & Pietro Sgarabotto 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 09:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
This photo has been approved as an old photo and its appropriate license. User:Milliot 28 march, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Carlo Bisiach sketch portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 09:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I have explained myself to you in the page that you have set for deletions.Please read carefully what I have explained, and stop this obsessive hounding for no reason. I am the author of the photos which I have marked as made by: Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1890 top tarisio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1890 back tarisio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1890 scroll tarisio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 scroll photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bignami Otello portrait by Passini 1983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I have explained myself to you in the page that you have set for deletions.Please read carefully what I have explained, and stop this obsessive hounding for no reason. I am the author of the photos which I have marked as made by: Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I have explained myself to you in the page that you have set for deletions.Please read carefully what I have explained, and stop this obsessive hounding for no reason. I am the author of the photos which I have marked as made by: Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sderci Igino violin scroll 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sderci Igino violin top 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 scroll photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 top venice research.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 back venice research.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 scroll venice research.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Keith Peck photo.jpg.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1868 scroll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Keep Referring to the many images (or other media file) above which are in the public domain because their copyright has expired.
This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years.
Strangely enough, all of a sudden, the option when uploading new reads:
This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired.
This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years.
Why was there a sudden change by the administrator and who would that be? In fact there are more than one options not available for taggin the License. Milliot 26 March, 2007
"BTW, A.Boito the photographer was very much in the circle of Italian violin makers in early 20th century. He documented many of the well known makers. I know for most people,it is very hard to keep track of photographers even if they were very famous 100 years ago." User:Milliot 28 March, 2007
I will be in touch with both tarisio.com and veniceresearch.com, and get their word on this subject. They have made these photos available for public access. If you wish to have further proof, I will do my best to provide it. Thank you for such sincere concern(s). User:Milliot 28 March, 2007
Image deletion warning | Image:Sderci Igino violin back 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 08:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I have explained myself to you in each discussion section of the page(s) that you have set for deletions. Please read carefully what I have explained, and stop this obsessive hounding for no reason. I am the author of the photos which I have marked as made by: Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
Warning
[edit]Hello,
Please do not delete the warning on images. If you disagree, please say so on the deletion discussion page. Regards, Yann 18:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Deletion warnings have no reason to be there, especially if I have explained myself more than once already. I would hope that Rtc can stop the hounding, especially since I have explained myself already several times over. Thank you User: Milliot 29 March, 2007
- Well, your explanation does not seem sufficient. Regards, Yann 19:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
To whom are they not? Have you read my explanations made on the discussion pages and elsewhere? Who is actually in charge of making decisions about what stays and what goes etc.....
- Hello,
- There are long term users, including Rtc who have experience about copyright and Commons policies. You seem to be new here, so please listen to them, it would make your participation most useful for everybody. Regards, Yann 19:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I find it interesting that Frinck has locked up the french and german versions of J.B. Vuillaume wikipage, despite the fact that many have put his photo of his so called Vuillaume violin which has been said "a questionable fiddle" and is not a good representation of J.B. Vuillaume's output. Yet nothing has been done about that, and he is free to lock up and protect the page and his photo.User: Milliot 29, March 2007
I have explained what the status is for all of the photos which he has raised issues with. All of them are clearly explained. If Rtc wishes, I can upload new versions but I will still specify that they were made by User:Milliot. As for Passini painting, Roberto Regazzi will be taking care of it since he knows the Bignami family well and new Passini personally. User: Milliot 29, March 2007
Vuillaume
[edit]J'ai maintenant la confirmation de mon luthier. Le "fiddle" contesté est bien de Vuillaume avec un certificat d'authenticité. Il l'a vendu à un client belge fin 2003. J'ai proposé de vous envoyer d'autre photographie, vous n'avez mème trouvé nécessaire de me répondre. J'avoue que mon intention en 2003 était surtout de faire une photo genre "nature morte" pour en garder le meilleur souvenir personnel du passage temporaire dans ma maison de cet instrument fabriqué d'un luthier et anciennement en propriété d'un violiniste aussi illustre.
J'ai difficile de comprendre vos réactions brusquantes, je trouverai mieux de collaborer ensemble, pour ainsi donner à Wiki un maximum. Je ne suis quand mème pas n'importe quel gymnasiaste pubertaire, qui veut faire croire au monde que le Strad du grenier serait authentique. Le violon Stainer par exemple, que j'ai mis sur commons est bien mentionné et documenté dans le livre de référence de Senn&Roy et j'ai eut le certificat suisse en mes mains. -- Frinck51 11:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Je suggere que vous alliez voir Mr. Vatelot ou Mr. Rampal a Paris ou Mr. Charles Bear, Hieronymus Kostler ou Roland Baugartner pour l'authenticite du violon. Si votre instrument etait fait par l'atelier de Vuillaume, il se pourrait que ce ne soit pas une des meilleures representations de J.B. Vuillaume pour afficher sur Wikipage.
En regardant les photos que vous avez pris, la plupart des experts pensent que c'est un travail plus recent. User:Milliot 2:22, 3 April, 2007 (UTC)
A simple question
[edit]Hello, here's a simple question for you. Please give a simple answer. Which of the following photos did you actually shoot yourself?
- Image:Bignami Otello portrait by Passini 1983.jpg
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 1.jpg
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 2.jpg
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 3.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin scroll 1924.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin top 1924.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin back 1924.jpg
- Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 scroll photo.jpg
- Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 1.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 2.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 3.jpg
- Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 top venice research.jpg
- Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 back venice research.jpg
- Image:Leandro Bisiach 1898 scroll venice research.jpg
- Image:Keith Peck photo.jpg.jpeg
- Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1868 scroll.jpg
If you keep removing deletion requests from picture pages and replacing author names inconsistently with your own user name, I shall request you to be blocked and all your pictures to be deleted, since it cannot be assumed then anymore that the others are correcly labelled as your own—you simply keep contradicting yourself too often, and I already doubt that any of these pictures were done by yourself. I already told you several times that this is not the way to do it, and you keep doing it anyway. Take this as a last warning; even if you are a new user, tolerance is not unlimited. --Rtc 11:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have explained it to you many times over.
The Passini painting will have a release license very soon. Everything else aside from venice research and tarisio, are my own, and I have made the appropriate corrections. Thank you.
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 1.jpg
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 2.jpg
- Image:Bignami Otello Bologna 1976 viola 3.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin scroll 1924.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin top 1924.jpg
- Image:Sderci Igino violin back 1924.jpg
- Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 scroll photo.jpg
- Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 1.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 2.jpg
- Image:Bisiach Carlo Firenze 1938 3.jpg
- Image:Keith Peck photo.jpg.jpeg release from the author is there
- Image:J.B.Vuillaume 1868 scroll.jpg
I would like to point your attention to Frinck User:Frinck51, who despite many warnings about a questionable instrument, keeps posting it on the J.B. Vuillaume (French and German) wikipage. Perhaps you can do something there?
User:Milliot 12:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Let's take for example Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg. You previously specified "F. Prodi/L.Rocchi" as the author, now you changed this into User:Milliot without any explanation. Did "F. Prodi/L.Rocchi" shoot the photo? If not, please explain the relation between "F. Prodi/L.Rocchi" and the photo, so I can understand the situation better. And what is "Analogic"? Please note that I only care about copyright, not about the content of these photos. If you have problems with the wikipedia article, you need to discuss that on wikipedia. --Rtc 17:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Again, I shot the photos. I did not wish to use my real name when I started , I was not aware that I could use my user name.
Now it is clear to me that I can. Thus, I have made the appropriate changes. The instruments are in my collection. So I could re-take them and still would put my user name. I hope that is clear. As you have seen, the photos that are old and in public domain are marked as such. The Passini photo will be taken care of by User: Florenus who actually published many books on Bignami and other makers. I will be in touch with O. Bignamis son, and hope to have him contribut something. Please let me know if you have other questions. If I use my own equipment (camera & etc), do you have a better word for describing the source rather than Analogic. Please let me know.
Incidentally, the issue I raised regarding User:Frinck/Frick51, has to do not with the article content rather the same issue: Photo and authenticity of the subject. I have explained to the User, that the photo is fine as a photo of a VIOLIN, but if it is labeled as a J.B.Vuillaume and many have raised doubts about the instrument's authenticity, then it should not be on the J.B.Vuillaume wikipage representing the Master's oeuvres. Perhaps you can do something about that? please. Thank you in advance. User:Milliot 18:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- please explain the relation between "F. Prodi/L.Rocchi" and the photo Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg, so I can understand the situation better. The question of embedding an image into a wikipedia page or not is an issue of wikipedia, too. --Rtc 21:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
A Simple Answer
[edit]I think I have repeated myself a great many times. I (User:Milliot) have made those photos. I can make new ones and upload them with my user name if you wish. Just let me know.
Can you address the other issue too?: Incidentally, the issue I raised regarding User:Frinck/Frick51, has to do not with the article content rather the same issue: Photo and authenticity of the subject. I have explained to the User, that the photo is fine as a photo of a VIOLIN, but if it is labeled as a J.B.Vuillaume and many have raised doubts about the instrument's authenticity, then it should not be on the J.B.Vuillaume wikipage representing the Master's oeuvres. Perhaps you can do something about that? please. Thank you in advance. User:Milliot 21:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you refuse to explain the relation between "F. Prodi/L.Rocchi" and the photo Image:Sesto Rocchi violin 1975 top & back plates photo.jpg, then you should in fact better make new ones and upload them with your user name. It is your choice. Also, you still have a note "to copy and distribute mentioning the author" on many pictures, which is in contradiction to the license. I can't and I won't address the other issue, as I already said. Further, I already told you that you are not supposed to remove deletion requests (or strike out pictures form the deletion request list). Stop it and help to clarify the copyright status of your pictures. The pictures won't be deleted soon, anyway. By removing deletion requests, however, you make yourself less credible and you rather support the deletion of your pictures that way. --Rtc 08:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please tell me which license should I choose then if I wish to state "to copy and distribute mentioning the author"....?
I have thought that this was appropriate " Own work, share alike, attribution required CC-BY-SA-2.5 " Also, I have explained about the photos....since I am new to wiki, and did not wish to use my name I now know that I am able to use my user name in uploading photos. Thank you in advance. User: Milliot 8:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- CC-BY-SA-2.5 permits modification and commercial use. You must use {{Cc-by-nc-nd}} if you do not want to permit this. --Rtc 19:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just visited the link you suggested, and it is Commons Deletion guidelines.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-by-nc-nd Is that a redirected link with a problem? User:Milliot 20:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's correct, if you want to release your pictures only "to copy and distribute mentioning the author", they will be deleted. So please delete this statement and accept the commercial use and modification of the pictures. --Rtc 10:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Changing tags
[edit]Hi - apologies for a delay in replying but I have been away. Without going through my contributions I cannot see exactly what you are referring to. However the only time I would change a tag would be if it was an edit made by an IP (rather than user) with no explanation in the edit summary. --Herby talk thyme 08:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sc0007b077.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:James Tubbs (1835-1921).jpg was uncategorized on 5 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Vuillaumeportraitmartini.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|