User talk:Milky/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Karl Pflaum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
178.10.111.153 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Eric-Paul Stekel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 13:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Carte Grenoble métropole
Salut Flappiefh,
Peux-tu faire une retouche sur la carte de la métropole de Grenoble. Dans la zone nord-est de la ville de Grenoble, la limite suit le cours de l'Isère. Donc la petite boucle (de l'île Verte) doit être totalement de couleur orange et non jaune comme le reste de la métropole.
Merci,
Milky (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Salut Milky. Je suis étonné : les frontières proviennent de GEOFLA et sont récentes (2014). Apparemment, pour les contours précis des communes, c'est pas top. En tout cas je viens de faire la correction. ++ Flappiefh (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Affiche expo 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gestumblindi (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
File:ENTREe museum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unités urbaines
Bonjour, merci pour la mise à jour de la carte des principales agglomérations, qui me paraît très largement inspirée de celle que j'ai mise en ligne fin 2014 (dans sa version la plus récente), bien que je n'aie pas vu de mention à cette première version dans la tienne. Bonne journée. --LucasD (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Caroline Roux (journaliste).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tiraden (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour. C'est une question toute personnelle. Je ne retrouve plus à Grenoble ces indications Caves-Refuges (sauf une Rue Archambeau). Pourriez-vous me dire où a été prise la photo ? Merci, Michel--86.68.63.62 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Je ne me souviens malheureusement pas où elle a été prise. Il est même possible que la façade ait été ravalée depuis. Milky (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Loreleil (talk) 14:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Schuss le skieur - Grenoble.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 20:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bibliotheque municipale - Grenoble.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thesupermat (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Bibliothèque municipale de Grenoble
Bonjour.
Suite à votre demande de suppression d'image [1], je voudrais juste vous faire la remarque suivante : l'image et l'article existent depuis novembre 2009.
Selon les statistiques de Wikipédia, l'article est vu en moyenne 8 fois par jour depuis donc 87 mois. On a donc plus de 20 000 personnes qui n'ont jamais été dérangées par la photo et aujourdhui c'est vous qui en demandez sa suppression.
Et je n'ai pas fait le compte pour la Wikipédia anglaise.
Inutile de me répondre en me donnant les raisons, je les connais par coeur. Je veux juste vous faire prendre conscience de quelque chose. A vous de trouver !
Milky (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, ne vous inquiétez pas pour moi. Juste que votre message est inutile et n'apporte rien au débat. Bonne fin de journée.--Thesupermat (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Villard-Bonnot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Pạtạfisik 19:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Milky/Archive 1,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Milky/Archive 1,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Exposition Grenoble 1925.jpg
- File:Hotel de Ville Grenoble.JPG
- File:Parc Paul Mistral - Grenoble.jpg
- File:Parc Paul Mistral 2- Grenoble.JPG
Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Milky/Archive 1,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Hector Berlioz, place Victor Hugo - Grenoble.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A01:CB00:A05:D100:24D1:892D:CE60:B51 15:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 18:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Image Tagging Image:Basilique Notre Dame à Grenoble.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Basilique Notre Dame à Grenoble.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Peter17 12:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
RE: tramway grenoble
Je comprends ce que tu dis, mais c'est comme au centre ville. Les lignes C et D vont jusqu'au Depot le soir et alors ils partagent la ligne avec le B. Car c'est une service exceptionnel j'ai mise ces parties en transparent. ChrisDHDR 18:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:GMCD-Grenoble.jpeg
Bonjour. Je t'ai répondu sur ma page. ~ bayo or talk 11:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Carte_postale_grenoble_110.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carte_postale_grenoble_110.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson (talk) 10:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)