User talk:Midnight bird

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Midnight bird!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Spostamenti

Come no.  Done--Trixt (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Fatto. Li trovi in File:Ducati 350 Mono Special.jpg e File:Ducati 350 Mono Special engine.jpg (ho tolto le parentesi, di solito non vaznno usate). Non ho modificato nulla della pagina di descrizione. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Fatto. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Midnight bird!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Peugeot Type 3 at the 2007's Bologna Motor Show.jpg was uncategorized on 9 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Mitsubishi Lancer 1600 GSR (Safari Rally 1976) at the 2007's Bologna Motor Show.jpg was uncategorized on 9 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Peugeot Type 3 at the 2007's Bologna Motor Show (side view).jpg was uncategorized on 9 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC

Non ne ho idea... O chiedi a Magnus Manske se riesce a recuperati quella vecchia (dubito) o rifai la procedura per l'account TUSC.--Trixt (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Da una breve ricerca in Commons ho trovato che l'unico modo è chiedere a Magnus di cancellarti il precedente account. Vai nella sua talk e usa questa sintassi: Hi Magnus. I seem to have lost my TUSC password. Could you nuke my account so I can resubscribe? Thanks in advance. Spero abbia tempo di fartelo. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token fa68ac84aa2ab179ae8ab551e13adde4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!--Midnight bird (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Attribuzione

No, non sei obbligato a citare l'autore se questi ha espressiamente chiesto di non farlo. Sei sempre obbligato se lo ha chiesto, altrimenti no. Molte opere famose ad esempio sono di autori anonimi (cioè che hanno deciso di restare anonimi, non che sono ignoti). Metti {{Anonymous}} nel campo autore. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Ciao. Dai un'occhiata a Commons:Fotografie di persone identificabili (ma COM:PEOPLE è più completa).--Trixt (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Midnight bird. You have new messages at DarwIn's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copyright status: File:USS Forrestal (CV-59), porto di Napoli, estate del 1975.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:USS Forrestal (CV-59), porto di Napoli, estate del 1975.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A 5309, Nave Rampino - 1976.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A 5309, Nave Rampino - 1976.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:USS Forrestal (CV-59), porto di Napoli, estate del 1975.jpg

Ciao. Recentemente è sorto un problema con la licenza {{FAL}} (vedi qui): per fartela breve, pare che un file sotto FAL obblighi a pubblicare il documento in cui è incluso con sempre con la FAL; è chiaro che, essendo i testi dei progetti Wikimedia sotto CC-BY-SA, non è più possibile usare la FAL (e solo la la FAL) per i file di Commons. Ora, la discussione è appena iniziata e sembra una bolla di sapone, e non capisco come mai DarwIn sia partito in tromba a cambiare i tag di copyright così, se nza dir niente. Sinceramente non so cosa dire; tra l'altro se tu, come detentore del copyright, fossi stato informato del problema, avresti potuto aggiungere la {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} e morta lì, ha poco senso mettere il PD-Italy per salvare la fotografia. Ora provo a rollbackare la sua modifica e scrivere nella talk del file; tu eventualmente, se non è un problema, cambia {{FAL}} con {{Self|FAL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, così la foto è sicuramente a posto. Boh, è che a volte, per la smania di salvare le immagini, qualcuno agisce a rullo compressore, quindi penso comunque a fin di bene...--Trixt (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Aggiornamento: dopo aver fatto quattro chiacchiere con DarwIn ho capito il problema. Praticamente, l'UploadWizard, il sistema con cui recentemente vengono caricati i file e da cui sei passato tu per caricare i due file segnalati qui sopra, ha un problema con la FAL: sostanzialmente è ingannevole, perché (si pensa) ti induce a credere che sia una licenza che vieti l'uso commerciale dei file: invece non è così, è del tutto analoga alla licenza libera CC-BY-SA-3.0 che consente l'uso commerciale. Ecco perché DarwIn ha cambiato licenza, perché credeva tu pensassi che la FAL fosse una licenza che vieta l'uso commerciale. Quindi adesso, come segnalato qui sopra, i file sono considerati "senza licenza": per favore, se intendi pubblicare le foto su Commons consentendo l'uso commerciale, usa una licenza libera come la {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, del tutto analoga alla FAL, altrimenti, lasciali così che verranno cancellati. Grazie per la pazienza :)--Trixt (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Se si desidera, è possibile restituire la licenza FAL, ma è necessario prendere coscienza di che hai capito che permette il riutilizzo commerciale, così come le licenze CC-BY-SA.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for licensing the photos. I just didn't want you to do something you didn't want to do, such as licensing them with FAL thinking it was a non-commercial licence. You may write to me in Italian, if you want, I understand it fairly well, though I'm not able to write it without the help of a translator. Ciao, i grazie mille, -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 23:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

.tif

No, ma è noto che i .tif e .tiff hanno problemi nella visualizzazione con alcuni browser, essendo tipi di file destinati più all'archiviazione che alla visualizzazione, e non andrebbero caricati (sarebbe meglio convertirlo in .png). Ciao--Trixt (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

AERI

Ihh, che figur'e'mmmm... Qui ha pure taroccato male, perché ha preso una foto fatta da terra (questa) e ci ha piazzato un aereo fotografato dall'alto. Se fosse volo capovolto non ci dovrebbe battere il sole, se fosse una foto dall'alto si dovrebbe vedere il suolo attraverso le nuvole. Comunque c'è qualcosa che non capisco ancora: c'è anche un certo AirComplete che ha caricato sospetti tarocchi. Si tratta dello stesso utente? Comunque, io posso solo cambiare descrizione. Dal punto di vista di Commons non ha commesso alcuna "infrazione", perché comunque le foto sono sue (a meno non abbia usato uno sfondo non suo, nel qual caso lo cancello per violazione di copyright). -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
PS Immagino che la persona in questione sia quella citata in questo articolo... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Midnight bird⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Midnight bird,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Struttura film lacrimale

Identico. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Gallica

Teoricamente non c'è differenza. Ma in questo ambiente per spiegare la differenza tra teoria e pratica tocca fare il disegnino. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jagdgeschwader 27.svg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jagdgeschwader 27.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 19:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:WASPbadge.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WASPbadge.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Rodrigo Basket

No, il problema è che la fotografia è del 1979, quindi non era in PD negli Stati Uniti nel 1996 e quindi non rispetta la URAA, onde su Commons non può stare. Può stare su it.wiki perché è comunque in PD in Italia. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Come fonte non saprei, magari viene da una rivista sportiva cartacea. La cancello da qui e la ricarichi su it.wiki in pd-italia. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Logo

Qui ci va solo se non supera la soglia di originalità. Non mi pare che la superi. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Anton Giulio Majano e Alberto Lupo.jpg

File:Anton Giulio Majano e Alberto Lupo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Haiti

Per quanto ne so, una foto del 1902 dovrebbe comunque essere in PD per inerzia :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Duck test

Si muove come una papera, cammina come una papera, starnazza come una papera. Difficile confonderlo per una quaglia. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Shazam

Ma anche no. Le sue fotografie hanno tutte dati Exif e sono a risoluzione maggiore degli analoghi trovati nel web. Voglio prima chiedergli se sono sue. Certo è un problema quando qualcuno pubblica su Commons le proprie foto dopo averle pubblicate altrove. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

De Tomaso

De Tomaso sì, basta il logo con la bandiera argentina sul frontale. Domani ci penso io. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 00:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ghezzi & Brian Super Twin 1100 (upper view).jpg

Hello. I think your photo and the three other of the same category are not a Ghezzi & Brian Supertwin. See File:Moto Guzzi 1100 Sport.JPG and File:Ghezzi & Brian Super Twin 1100.jpg. Best regards. --Cjp24 (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

A Moto Guzzi 1100 Sport Corsa, as indicated? --Cjp24 (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

For information, the four files were renammed (in Moto Guzzi 1100 Sport Corsa....jpg) and recategorized today. --Cjp24 (talk) 14:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Karaya4ic.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karaya4ic.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Karaya4ic.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Karaya4ic.jpg

File:Karaya4ic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

75.61.64.174 05:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)