User talk:Micropix

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Micropix!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Is this root hair multicellular?

[edit]

@Micropix: I have a question to you on your photo. The wikimedia photo of root-hairs on epiblema (rhizodermis) shows

File:Solanum tuberosum, tiller, Etzold green 3.jpg

a partition like (or cross-wall-like structure).


The red arrow indicates the partition-like thing

What is this?

up to my knowledge, root-hairs are unicellular. So it is giving me an awkward feeling. Then is it an exception? or this is just an artifact such as a fold or crack? (it does not seem to be artefact) . Or it could be an organell's (such as vacuole's membrane) (or if in this seemingly stained specimen if vacuoles do not survive then maybe a buble wall)? or maybe it is a stem hair? or maybe Solanum tuberosum contains more than one cell? or may be only this one root hair or only this one individual plant was anomalous?

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 18:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]