User talk:MichellDasilva

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MichellDasilva!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jorgeluisdiazgranados.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jorgeluisdiazgranados.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jorgeluisdiazgranados.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Suzy Oh  ^{tell me} 21:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

La imagen debe tener una licencia libre y en esos enlaces no aparece nada por lo tanto está bajo derechos de autor. Lee esto para saber cuales licencias son aceptables aquí.--Suzy Oh  ^{tell me} 23:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Empty categories

Hi MichellDasilva, yesterday you created Category:J.L. Diazgranados and Category:Jorge Luis Diaz Granados Lugo which appear redundant to each other and remained empty. I've speedily deleted both categories per COM:SPEEDY#C2. You are free to ask me for an undelete of one of the two categories once you have actual contents for it. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello @AFBorchert Yes, I am aware of the situation, an administrator deleted the photos for indicating that the photos do not have rights of public use but I already warned him that those photos are authorized by the same author to use them, for that reason there were no photos there. Therefore, if I request the restoration of category https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Jorge_Luis_Diaz_Granados_Lugo&action=edit&redlink=1, to add information with public use right. MichellDasilva (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

I have long had the author's permission to upload the image and attribute its rights of public use. But I have never been able to add a template that indicates the creative commons attribution rights. 😞 MichellDasilva (talk) 06:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi MichellDasilva, such cases ought to be handled through VRT by the copyright holder. Once this has been clarified and the photo restored, the associated category can be restored as well. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the author already informed me that he sent an email authorizing its use and authorizes me to use it. In fact I have sent the ticket of the message received by the author to the administrator informing him of it. MichellDasilva (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

This is correct, ticket:2022020910015235 exists and I have taken care of that. Unfortunately, the permission is not yet sufficient. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@AFBorchert I have contacted the author again, I suggested as commented by him to do it well this time so that they accepted his photos, he tells me that this time he did it correctly the ticket is 2022021010005814. MichellDasilva (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi MichellDasilva, this is still not sufficient and I've responded. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The author of the photo, image informed me that he has contacted you by mail. I will be ready for any news, until the image or category can be uploaded, used or restored, thank you very much. MichellDasilva (talk) 13:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Case: File:Jorge_Luis_Diaz_Granados_Lugo.jpg from wikimedia

It is recorded here on wikimedia that the real author of the photos had all the necessary means to contribute by providing their images for public use, updated the records of their works so that they are Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, provided metadata and EXIF ​​information, submitted a version of the final image with the same computer data, He contacted the people of VRT. but Wikimedia decided to reject the contribution of the author in question. It is worth mentioning that the same image was deleted by the administrator Jameslwoodward indicating in his first template that the photo was taken from a social network, in this case Facebook, Likewise, also indicated in his clarification that this photo did not have the right of public use. However, now that the photo has full public use rights the administrator AF Borchert - who has been in continuous contact with the real author of the images, Rejects the author's contribution because it is still not enough. It is confirmed here in wikimedia, the effort of the person who wants to contribute by contributing their works for public use, but Wikimedia does not agree to receive or restore in any way the deleted image in question De728631.

This section has been created for future contributions from other users who want to resume the case. Please do not delete this section or report it. MichellDasilva (talk) 23:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Shared ticket by the author Ticket#2022021110010208, the last contact I had with the author of the images provided me with said ticket and informed me of the following. The author of the images got tired of trying in vain to want to provide his works to Wikimedia, due to lack of competition from wikimedia (conflict of interest of the VRT itself). The continuous objections, obstacles and setbacks exaggerated and exposed by the same VRT staff, have led the author of the works to decline his offer. He pointed out that he shared sensitive information to verify his identity, his identification number from his country, including a Screenshot of the Id of his verified account in safecreative, and the same administrator AF Borchert after receiving said information only responded by saying that it is not enough either and has left the benefit of doubt if the identity of the author is the real one or some impostor pretending to be him.

It is important to point out at this point that the author or any other person who has an account in safecreative, has the option to verify their real identity and to complete this process they will need their Personal Data such as identification data or passport from their country. This lack of competence and veracity of the Wikimedia itself has led the author to decline to contribute his works to it. The lousy management and the bad treatment received continuously towards his person have led him to make this decision. He specifically reported that they demanded one thing, then another, then another, and when there were no more objections, he was eventually denied his contribution to Wikimedia. To reaffirm the above, I provide screenshots or images of the author's safecreative account id, where it is clearly indicated that his identity is real, that is, that it is verified. And I also share the responses of the administrator AF Borchert who responded by refusing to accept the works despite all the effort Jameslwoodward De728631 Ontzak VRT.

Link to images https://1drv.ms/u/s!AszSNJVCO497cy8Do7Q7ORx_VWo?e=jG3OSM This case in particular, remains here registered in wikimedia and it is requested not to delete this thread for future solutions. Hugs and kisses. 😘�MichellDasilva (talk) 09:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)