User talk:Michaeolson
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:State Representative Erik Mortensen.gif
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, The images are official portraits used by the stage governments. They are in the public domain. Under the source the state government website should be listed. Michaeolson (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tim-Baxter.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit] Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.
Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, The pictures should be usable. Other Wikipedia pages use politicians official portraits and they are in the public domain. If I need to add more information please let me know. Michaeolson (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ben-Adams-Idaho.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
![]() |
Hello Michaeolson.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Steve-Carra.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 19:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]Эlcobbola talk 19:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose - Nonsense request. Please review w:WP:OTHERSTUFF and w:Federalism. 17 U.S.C. § 105, which you are implicitly invoking, applies only to federal works. State works (which you've not even demonstrated these are, as governmental entities routinely commission private photographs for official portraits and copyrights do not necessarily transfer) are only public domain in California, Florida, Massachusetts and in some specific departments of other states. If you'd actually looked at the source you provided for File:Steve-Carra.jpg, for example, you'd have seen "© 2009 - 2022 Michigan House Republicans. All Rights Reserved." COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer here. Эlcobbola talk 19:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Under Michigan's copyright description it says to not post for commercial purposes I'm pretty sure educational purposes would be ok. Could you give advice instead of snark? Michaeolson (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- What part of "The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including: [...] commercial use" above is unclear? COM:L, linked no less than seven times (!!!) above says "Commercial use of the work must be allowed" (italics in original). COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer here. Эlcobbola talk 20:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Under Michigan's copyright description it says to not post for commercial purposes I'm pretty sure educational purposes would be ok. Could you give advice instead of snark? Michaeolson (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll make sure they have commercial purposes availaible. Michaeolson (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think we can use the Erik Mortensen picture as long as we post source. This was from the website
- "Except when specifically stated on a legislative page, anyone may view, copy, or distribute information found on a legislative website for personal or nonprofit use. A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website for commercial purposes or publish the information for commercial gain without proper attribution of source." Michaeolson (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Your quote, just with underlining: "A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website for commercial purposes or publish the information for commercial gain without proper attribution of source." Consider also reviewing w:WP:CIR. Эlcobbola talk 20:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- "Except when specifically stated on a legislative page, anyone may view, copy, or distribute information found on a legislative website for personal or nonprofit use. A person or entity may not use any part of the information on a legislative website for commercial purposes or publish the information for commercial gain without proper attribution of source." Michaeolson (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
So that wouldn't work? I guess I'm not sure if the source is viewable here. Sorry I haven't made edits in years. Michaeolson (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Again, you need to read COM:L. We require licenses to be specific and also to address, among others, commercial usage, derivatives and perpetuity. We have even explicitly rejected MN government works; no knowledge of Commons discussions is needed if you actually read guidance and terms critically. Эlcobbola talk 20:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok I recommend you review this paragraph from there:
It does not mean "come down hard like a ton of bricks on someone as soon as they make a mistake". We should cut editors (particularly new ones) some slack, and help them understand how to edit competently. Mistakes are an inevitable part of the wiki process. Michaeolson (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- You ignored substantial guidance and warnings above. You ignored crystal clear language of your own sources. You ignored the guidance of the Special:UploadWizard--including lying about authorship of File:Tim-Baxter.jpg; the very first selection after uploading a file is the binary "This file is my own work" and "This file is not my own work". No experience is needed ("particularly new ones") to answer that correctly. This is not "as soon as they make a mistake"; you had five warnings ([1][2][3][4][5][6]). Five times is not a mistake, but willful ignorance. Эlcobbola talk 20:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)