User talk:MichaelDiederich

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thomas Mann

[edit]

Hi, please add your source for Image:Thomas Mann3.jpg. Thuresson 03:16, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Thanks for your help. I assume this is a German photograph and since Germany has the strictest copyright law in Europe - and has convinced the other EU countries to adopt the same law - photographs of Thomas Mann will probably not become public domain until the 2030s - 2050s (lifetime of photographer + 70 years). Thuresson 16:30, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"/"

[edit]

Hallo, vielen Dank für die Info, daß ich keinen / in Bildbeschreibungen verwenden soll. ...aber warum? Sind noch andere Sonderzeichen nicht erwünscht/erlaubt? Gruß Uwe


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcademachine.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Frumpy 16:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, File:Tattoo-back.jpg (your upload) seems to be cc by-nd 1.0 per the source linked and the same page in the wayback machine around the time of the upload as well.

Am I missing something? (the description page says cc by (not sa or nd)) I'm kinda rusty and it seems to have gone unnoticed for 5+ years so I'm not sure. Thanks --Jeremyb (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tattoo-back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 11:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Pedelec-wildwind.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pedelec-wildwind.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. – Adrignola talk 12:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedelec-wildwind.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yellowcard (talk) 21:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]