User talk:Merkið

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo Merkið, ich sehe auf der angegebenen Quell-Website keine Evidenz für die CC-BY-Lizenz. "Pressefotos" gelten generell als nicht frei genug für Commons, sofern sie nicht explizit einer Commons-verträglichen Lizenz (COM:L) unterstellt wurden. Am einfachsten wäre es wenn du den Fotografen kontaktieren und um eine Bestätigung der Lizenz gegenüber permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org bitten würdest. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: MSS Stellt die Bilder auf seiner Homepage ausdrücklich Linzenzfrei zur Verfügung. Was soll also dieser Löschantrag? -- 84.136.128.209 10:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC) (user:Leif Czerny von unterwegs).[reply]
File:Michael Schmidt-Salomon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MrButler (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Schmidt-Salomon, Trier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tohma (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Https www.sabaton.net wp-content uploads 2020 07 Black-Logotype-PNG-1.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Https www.sabaton.net wp-content uploads 2020 07 Black-Logotype-PNG-1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]