User talk:Menschenmaterial

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Menschenmaterial!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deine Uploads

[edit]

Servus Henry,
da es auch schon anderen aufgefallen ist: Könnest du bei deinen Uploads darauf achten, dass du den Festival-Baustein nicht in das "Description"-Feld packst, sondern darunter (wie beispielsweise hier). So wie du es machst wirkt es nämlich massiv überladen und teilweise geht auch die Beschreibung sofern vorhanden unter. Zudem wäre es auch sinnvoll, das "Description"-Feld auch wirklich mit der Beschreibung auszufüllen, da nicht jeder z.B. sich den Bildtitel anschaut und manche Programme auch gezielt das "Description"-Feld auslesen. Auch solltest du wie im Forum angesprochen, den Text im credits-Feld so anpassen, dass klar wird, das die Bitte nach einer Mailanfrage vor Nutzung kein zwingender Bestandteil der Lizenzbedingungen ist, sondern eben nur eine "Bitte". Vielen Dank & viele Grüße --Isderion (talk) 23:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die konstruktive Kritik Isderion! Ich werde meinen Baustein mal umbauen - das waren die ersten Gehversuche und ich habe mir hier und dort was zusammengeklaubt mit bester Absicht, alles richtig zu machen. Gibt es ein Tool, um via Massenersetzung die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder zu ändern? Der Commonist, mein momentaner HochladeHelfer, bringt mich da nicht wirklich weiter. --Menschenmaterial (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Massenersetzung können von Bots durchgeführt werden, wenn sich ein Botbetreiber findet das zu übernehmen (Commons:Bots/Work requests) oder wahrscheinlich auch von einem selbst mit dem Tool Help:VisualFileChange.js (für dein Fall siehe vorallem Help:VisualFileChange.js/samples#Moving_content). Bevor du jedoch mit der Ersetzung beginnst solltest du den neuen credit-Text mal im Commons:Forum gegenlesen lassen. Viele Grüße --Isderion (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knorkator-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Devil Wears Prada-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Savages-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not what you'd call a flattering photo. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das gehört doch eher zu dir - Glückwunsch zum ersten featured pic ;) -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelseagrin-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highfield - Turbostaat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 14:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highfield - American Authors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melt-Festival-ambi-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me, but more opinions are appreciated. --C messier 20:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highfield - Karamelo Santo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Tsungam 07:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highfield - INVSN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support As long as face is in focus, it is QI for me. --C messier 16:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagel-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --A.Savin 10:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Highfield - American Authors.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Highfield - American Authors.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immergut JochenDistelmeyer-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KosmonautFestival PrinzPi-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

immergut

[edit]

Hallo, du hast dieses File:Immergut JochenDistelmeyer-1.jpg vom immergut hochgeladen. hast du ncoh weitere bilder vom immergut? fyi Category:Immergut Festival 2016 gruß --Z thomas 08:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jep. Nur weiß ich noch nicht genau, wann ich es schaffe, da einmal durchzuarbeiten. Geht es dir um etwas spezielles? --Menschenmaterial (talk) 10:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
nein, ich hatte nix spezielles gesucht. ich hab ja vom gefühl her, bis auf die djs alle bands fotografiert. Category:Immergut Festival 2016
aber der artikel zur fat white family würde sich vielleihct über ein besseres bild freuen, vielleicht auch ein schnipel-bild vom frontman
ich warte, wenn du was hoch lädst

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casper-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noise unavoidable given the fast ISO and situation. --Daniel Case 16:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Splash19-ssio-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erlende-oye-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Bastian-Muhr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastian-Muhr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jochen-Plogsties-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jochen-Plogsties-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

RacoonyRE (Disk.) 18:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bastian-Muhr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]