User talk:Melcous

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Melcous!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Message to Melcous I have tried to contact you via various channels, one being Dustin at { http://www.popflock.com/learn?s=User_talk:Melcous/Archive_7} and now this rather unorthodox channel at Wikimedia and not Wikipedia. I apologize. Hi! Melcous Saw your edits/restructuring on/of Angelique Rockas Wikipedia . There is some anomalous editing taking place which you should rectify as the links are of key importance. User:Chalk19, removed all reference links of Theatricalia. on both the Angelique Rockas and the Internationalist theatre Wikis stating they are not valid sources. If you look at the Brecht archive on both Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre you will see that casting details of the Mother Courage production were taken from Theatricalia. And this is a world class archive of a world class dramatist . Furthermore if you look at the Wikipedia entry for the well known British actress Julia Foster <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Foster>, you will find:Refrence 62 to 67are all from Theatricalia . Below is the Julia Foster list : check out the references yourself.


62 "Production of Happy Birthday | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February2016. 63"Production of After You With The Milk | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February 2016. 64"Production of Time and the Conways | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February 2016. 65 "Production of The Women | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February2016. 66 "Production of Preserving Mr. Panmure | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February 2016. 67 "Production of The Rise and Fall of Little Voice | Theatricalia". theatricalia.com. Retrieved 16 February 2016. On Wikidata Theatricalia is provided as an Identifier. It would be constructive if restore the Theatricalia links on both articles.


Also as someone interested in womens` history there are many obvious attempts of both these Wikipedia entries to try to minimize the achievement of the said female Angelique Rockas by an 99.99% male editorship. You are part of the .0000001 % It would be best if you took on the task of reducing the size of the introduction, and to incorporate the rest into Career. The British Library do not just accept any archives , but seminal ones. Wikipedia editors generally are`nt aware of this . So cheap payment with dollars are really a male pathology. Thank you Britzick Can`t sign off on my laptop