User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2010/August
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phacochoerus aethiopicus (desert warthog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16139-Prinzipalmarkt-korr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16154-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15965-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15975-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15981-Überwasserkirche-Petrus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iomega Vorderseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15984-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15982-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15998-Überwasserkirche-Sockelfigur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15996-Überwasserkirche-Schlüssel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16000-Überwasserkirche-Türgriff .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16240-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Schöne Bilder
ich sollte mir auch eine vernünftige Kamera kaufen. Deine ARbeit gefällt mir! salut--Symposiarch (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für das Kompliment, die SLRs sind js inzwischen günstiger geworden. Mein Tipp: Achte mehr auf das Objektiv als auf den Body, die sind inzwischen fast alle OK, ob Nikon, Canon oder Pentax. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für den Tipp. Die Marken für die Bauteile die ok sind hast du genannt, aber welches Objektiv empfiehlst du?!? --Symposiarch (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Das kommt auf die Kamera an. Die meisten Bundleobjektive gehen aber bis 55mm, sodass Du faktisch kurz danach ein Telezoom kaufen sollst, weil man damit in der Praxis nicht klarkommt. Entweder gleich ein Zoom, das etwas mehr bringt, oder erstmal überlegen, was Du photographieren willst. Es gibt im Netz eine Menge Tests zu Objektiven, eventuell kannst Du auch mal bei Heise gucken. Wenn Du mir sagst, was konkret Du knippsen willst und was Dir gefällt, könnte ich Dir etwas dazu sagen. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Das sind verschiedene Aufgaben: für Lebensmittel benötige ich sicher ein Makro, ansonsten eher das Telezoom für Gebäudedetails.--Symposiarch (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Das kommt auf die Kamera an. Die meisten Bundleobjektive gehen aber bis 55mm, sodass Du faktisch kurz danach ein Telezoom kaufen sollst, weil man damit in der Praxis nicht klarkommt. Entweder gleich ein Zoom, das etwas mehr bringt, oder erstmal überlegen, was Du photographieren willst. Es gibt im Netz eine Menge Tests zu Objektiven, eventuell kannst Du auch mal bei Heise gucken. Wenn Du mir sagst, was konkret Du knippsen willst und was Dir gefällt, könnte ich Dir etwas dazu sagen. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für den Tipp. Die Marken für die Bauteile die ok sind hast du genannt, aber welches Objektiv empfiehlst du?!? --Symposiarch (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16342-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16352-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16005-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16261-Drubbel ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16202-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16110-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16268-Roggenmarkt-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16266-buschmann-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16264-Drubbel ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16256- .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16553-Praxisklinik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16456-St-Viktor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16510-Altes-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16270-Roggenmarkt-k.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16418-sT-vIKTOR-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16572-Schloss-Spiegelung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16580-Schloss-Spiegelung-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16606-Schloss-Herkulesstatue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17208-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Hab mal ein wenig am Licht gedreht. Was sagst du dazu? Kann auch gerne, wenn's dir gefällt, über das ursprüngliche Bild drübergeladen werden. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Der Florian ist nicht gelb. Darüber hinaus weist die Bearbeitung sowohl allgemein in hellen Bildteilen als auch insbesondere im Rotkanal Clipping auf. Ich kann keine Verbesserung erkennen. --smial (talk) 17:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Jo, die Farbe mag falsch sein. Sonst ist die Überbelichtung der Fenster entfernt, die Unterbelichtung der Schatten und vor allem des Himmels. Clipping-Fehler können bei JPG-Bearbeitung sicherlich entstehen, sind aber m. E. eher durch die hellere Grundstimmung eher zu sehen. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:18, 22 August 2010 (UTC) P. S.: Hab die Farbe geändert.
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17761-Fernsehturm-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17801-Telekom-Tower-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17510-Robinson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17279-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16987-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16994-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17069-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16933-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16567-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16578-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17771-Flamingo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17810-Telekomhaus-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17627-Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17165-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16227-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Nordkirchen-100814-16634-Schloss-Suedbruecke-cor.jpg
Guten Tag!
File:Nordkirchen-100814-16634-Schloss-Suedbruecke-cor.jpg
Ich sehe auf dem Himmel viel dunkler Flecke (schmutzigen Linse). Man muss korrigieren.
MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ohje, gleich ein ganzer Schwarm davon... -- smial (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Danke, lieber George,
habe mir schon ein Linsenreinigungsset bestellt, habe versucht zu korrigieren. Habe ich alle erwischt?
lg --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Errors =>Temporary ImageNotes -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Can you have a last look? --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Es ist jetzt ausgezeichnet. Ich habe die Anmerkungen entfernt.
- Promoted
MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Can you have a last look? --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
FP
- Statue of a lion in Nordkirchen
- Vase in Nordkirchen
Du kannst versuchen, die Nominationen FP (EB) zu machen. Ich werde unterstützen.
MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke George, das ist sehr nett, aber im Moment bin ich von FP etwas genervt, weil die Entscheidungen da sehr willkürlich fallen. QI reicht mir und das Review ist mir wichtig, damit ich meine Bilder verbessern kann. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ja, die Lösungen kommen zufällig vor. Jedoch gibt es mir den Eifer. Es ist dem Fischfang ähnlich, das Ergebnis wird zufällig. MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Netter Vergleich *g* Vielleicht sollte ich da auch ab und an fischen... --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Wir gehen auf den Fischfang zusammen! Ja? *g* --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Netter Vergleich *g* Vielleicht sollte ich da auch ab und an fischen... --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ja, die Lösungen kommen zufällig vor. Jedoch gibt es mir den Eifer. Es ist dem Fischfang ähnlich, das Ergebnis wird zufällig. MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg
File:Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg
Noch einmal, ich sehe auf dem Himmel viel dunkler Flecke (schmutzigen Linse). Man muss korrigieren.
MfG --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|