User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2009/March
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Mbdortmund! Beim o.a. Bild habe ich die von dir eingegebenen Koordinaten korrigiert. Bei Location sollen der Kamerastandort und Blickrichtung eingegeben werden. Viele Grüße --Druffeler (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Das weiß ich, der Nachteil bei Deiner Lösung ist nun, dass das abgebildete Objekt nicht auf der Karte zu sehen ist, deshalb hatte ich mich für die andere Lösung entschieden. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Karte? In GoogleEarth kommt es halt auf den Zoom an. Finde ich nicht so nachteilig.--Druffeler (talk) 12:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nur als Hinweis, vielleicht nutzt Du die Einstellung des Zoomfaktors, um das Problem zu minimieren. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Einstellung des Zoomfaktors??? Wie geht das?--Druffeler (talk) 08:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wenn Du den Geo-Locator benutzt, findest Du links oben ein Menü mit Voreinstellungen, dort kannst Du unter «Scale» die Auflösung wählen. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ich arbeite mit "Get Coordinates", das kennt die Funktion nicht.--Druffeler (talk) 07:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wenn Du den Geo-Locator benutzt, findest Du links oben ein Menü mit Voreinstellungen, dort kannst Du unter «Scale» die Auflösung wählen. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Einstellung des Zoomfaktors??? Wie geht das?--Druffeler (talk) 08:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Das weiß ich, der Nachteil bei Deiner Lösung ist nun, dass das abgebildete Objekt nicht auf der Karte zu sehen ist, deshalb hatte ich mich für die andere Lösung entschieden. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Do-Bittermark 2725.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo, ich verstehe diese Kategorisierung [1] und [2] nicht ganz. Die Vogelwarte Rossitten liegt in Ostpreußen, was hat das mit Radolfzell am Bodensee zu tun? Ich hab es mal geändert, aber falls Du einen tieferen Grund für die Kategorisierung hattest und das kein Versehen war, wäre es schön, wenn Du dazuschreiben würdest, wie du auf Radolfzell kamst. Danke im voraus. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, ich hab nicht genau hingeguckt, unsere de-BKL "Rossitten" verweist auf die de:Süddeutsche Vogelwarte in Radolfzell, das habe ich dann mechanisch eingefügt, obwohl es dort heißt: "aus der Verlegung der Vogelwarte Rossitten in das Schloss Bodman in Möggingen bei Radolfzell im Jahre 1945", während das Foto aus dem Jahr 1939 stammt. mfg und Danke für Deinen Hinweis --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Aah. Da muss man mal draufkommen. Dass eine Ostseevogelwarte an den schönen Bodensee wanderte bzw. vertrieben wurde, darauf bin ich gar nicht erst gekommen. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hast Du genügend Kenntnisse, um eine passende Cat anzulegen? --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Aah. Da muss man mal draufkommen. Dass eine Ostseevogelwarte an den schönen Bodensee wanderte bzw. vertrieben wurde, darauf bin ich gar nicht erst gekommen. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Attendorn 3205.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question
Question for you here regarding this image. --Notyourbroom (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I answered there. --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- There is a new version of the image up, and I would appreciate your further comments. Best, Notyourbroom (talk) 19:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Melanchthon-Gemeinde-Dortmund-0001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Do-Bittermark 2714.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franziskanerkirche-Dortmund-2009-0014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dortmund-Ostfriedhof-DSC 0143.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ostenfriedhof-Dortmund-2009-0022a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:35, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:35, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)