User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2009/June

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-070602 7633-Steinhaus-Fenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Lycaon 21:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westfalenpark-chessplayers--20070525 7211-DSC 7213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice subject & composition --Ianare 08:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-070602 7603-Steinhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 12:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-CEAG-Haus-070530 7389-DSC 7389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality's ok. Not a lot of building left amongst the trees, though. Maedin 16:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-Muensterstrasse-070530 7378-DSC 7378a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ever so slight noise in the sky, but otherwise ok. Maedin 17:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-070602 7727-Kloster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it's ok, but this is not the door it is called Tympanon --Berthold Werner 13:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-070602 7743-Eckhaus-Cabrio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could've been a tad sharper, but good enough to get a QI stamp. Lycaon 20:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-20090522arm-wie-eine-Kirchenmaus-DSC 7111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Afrank99 16:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-Eving-Nollendorfplatz-DSC 7318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 15:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-070602 7684-Rathaus-Skulptur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong light, but not spoiling. Ok to me. P.S. I'd crop at the left to avoid the "museum" signpost. Maedin 18:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-20090522-Alt-Katze-Werne-DSC 7777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very professional quality of photo, but problem in object. I know creativity of Otmar Alt. In my view, this sculpture like kitsch: mechanical turning work and tawdry colouring. --George Chernilevsky 07:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
If you think technical quality is good, then you should promote. Choice and nature of subject are rather discussed in FP candidates. Lycaon 08:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)  Support QI by professional quality of photo --George Chernilevsky 08:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

License added --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


License added --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

License added --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

License added --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamm-Hindu--090606 7844-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. Yann 18:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamm-Hindu--090606 7853-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. Yann 18:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamm-Hindu--090606 7835-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. Yann 18:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werne-20090522-Alt-Katze-Werne-DSC 7776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Same, in my view, problem in aesthetic quality of object. The professional quality of this photo is very high. --George Chernilevsky 07:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
If you think technical quality is good, then you should promote. Choice and nature of subject are rather discussed in FP candidates. Lycaon 08:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)  Support QI by professional quality of photo --George Chernilevsky 08:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 CommentI agree with George concerning the quality of the sculpture, but Alts sculptures are present at central points of many cities in Westfalen, and he has also success in commercial design, that's wy I like to show some his sculptures. mfg --Mbdortmund 12:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-Eving-Nollendorfplatz-DSC 7339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice composition, sharp. Yann 08:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0336-DSC 8433-Hanseatic-Trade-Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is inevitable - distortion issue, but overall very good
 Support --George Chernilevsky 05:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0044-DSC 8136-Bagger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo for me.
Es ist die gute Fotografie, mir hat gefallen --George Chernilevsky 19:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0106-DSC 8202-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good view
 Support --George Chernilevsky 06:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0046-DSC 8138-Container-Kran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Maedin 14:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

:)

Hi, Mbdortmund !

Always please!

  • The review it is interesting if to be fair with itself.
  • I very much liked your comment about a Alt's sculpture.
  • The major target is to make a nice shot, the mintor target - to receive QI stamp.

A little bit it is a pity that my photo of navy ship did not reviewed.

With best regards,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 21:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi George,

I normaly don't review pictures about military objects because I don't no much about this issue, so I didn'nt have a close look your picture of the ship, but I saw a lot of other of your good pictures.

Auf gute Zusammenarbeit --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!
Der gute Wunsch.
Sie haben mir mein erstes QI Zeichen gegeben.
Ich wünsche Ihnen das gute Schaffen in der Zukunft!
:) --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0006-DSC 8097-Barkasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good viev, sharp and good DOF --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0113-DSC 8209-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting architecture, perspective is corrected. Blown sky hard to avoid, HDR not an option with many possibly moving objects. --Iotatau 21:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0120-DSC 8216-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Aesthetically good point of view and good quality --George Chernilevsky 16:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-Eving-Nollendorfplatz-DSC 7274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0286-DSC 8383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would like to transfer my promotion from the frontal view to this one which I find better. :) --Iotatau 21:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0092-DSC 8186-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality in details, good DOF. Bit problem with clouds and blue colour balance. Overall: realistic view and QI. Good shot --George Chernilevsky 10:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0091-DSC 8185-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good view --George Chernilevsky 20:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0201-DSC 8298-Protest-gegen-Scientology.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality/composition, informative. Would like to see in the US ;-) --Ianare 05:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0136-DSC 8233-Hochbahn-Hafen-Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments clear and good in detail --George Chernilevsky 12:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Ein schönes Bild, zumal ich die Ecke auch kenne. Obwohl das Bild sehr gerade ist und auch nicht komplett entzerrt zu sein scheint – ich habe in der Bildbearbeitung Hilfslinien angelegt – wäre eine geringere Entzerrung rechts vielleicht nicht verkehrt. Für mich scheint das Gebäude an dieser Stelle leicht nach hinten zu kippen. Das kleine restliche Stück Gitter in der Mitte des Vordergrundes würde ich hemmungslos wegstempeln. Es ist weder bildrelevant noch wäre die Retusche eine Verfälschung. Ich gehe davon aus, daß das Ding nicht im Sucher zu sehen war, weil die D80 eben nicht alles zeigt. Ich habe mir deshalb schon angewöhnt, immer einen Hauch enger zu zoomen, das paßt schon. Grüße --Eva K. is evil 22:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Danke für Deine guten Hinweise, ich will mir das RAW noch einmal vornehmen. Das Hauptproblem bei den Aufnahmen war, dass ich nur kurz und mit einer Gruppe in Hamburg war, außerdem war das Wetter sehr wechselhaft mit heftigen Kontrasten. Mir fehlte einfach ein wenig die Ruhe. Beim Verändern der Perspektive bin ich immer etwas vorsichtig und lasse einen Rest an stürzenden Linien, ein wenig korrigiert ja auch das Auge des Betrachters mit. Aber ich will mich noch einmal daranwagen. Ich frag Dich dann noch einmal, was Du davon hältst. --Mbdortmund (talk) 08:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-090619-8522-Rathaus-Vohwinkel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. Maedin 11:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-090619-8496-Rathaus-Vohwinkel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, though it does get a litte fuzzy at the top. Maedin 11:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationa Maritime Museum Hamburg - side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting subject, good exposure and perspective correction. Crop is a bit tight. --Iotatau 12:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 Comment P.S. The photographer has nominated another view of the same building which is better so I "transfer" my nomination. --Iotatau 21:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
That's OK, but you don't need to make a choice which is the best picture of XY here. --Mbdortmund 07:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok. Maedin 11:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Die Erdkröte

Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!

Danke Schön für die beigefügte Beschreibung in den Fotografien die Erdkröte. Es ist zwei verschiedene Tiere im Wald. Sie groß, neben 20 cm.

Auf Wiedersehen,

Auf gute Zusammenarbeit :-)

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Gern, eine schöne und nützliche Serie!

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG 6364-Ostfriedhof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very effective. Shame about the cut off fingers, though. Maedin 16:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duesseldorf 1943.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and sharp in detail. Very original buildings with distortion by construction. %*) --George Chernilevsky 12:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0249-DSC 8346-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 13:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benno-Elkan-DSC 0037.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality close-up --George Chernilevsky 19:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-090624-8729-Baerenklau-an-der-Ruhr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Danger! VERY Toxic plant --N.Nych 05:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-090624-8624-Chinesisches-Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 07:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-090624-8619-chinese-garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, nice --George Chernilevsky 07:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruhr-Uni-Bochum-0205a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 07:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duesseldorf 1950.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Spare, simple and elgant minimalism. — Daniel Case 03:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0159-DSC 8256-Jugendherberge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Nicely avoided your own reflection. Lycaon 21:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DO-Eving-Nollendorfplatz-DSC 7274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-090624-8731-Stiepel-an-der-Ruhr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Lycaon 10:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Port of Hamburg, church

Ich begrüsse Sie, Mbdortmund!

Es ist die kleine Korrektur der Fotografie nötig (Port of Hamburg, church). Die Fahne auf dem Himmel der Überflüssige und die kleine. Und die kleine Neigung.

Mit dem Wunsch Ihnen des ganzen Guten :-)

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, das stimmt. Ich kann das später versuchen, obwohl die Neigung wohl schwer zu korrigieren ist. Das Bild war stark verzerrt...

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Selbst wenn nur die Fahne.

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0256-DSC 8353-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great lighting and composition --Cowenby 04:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0236-DSC 8333-Zollmuseum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great lighting, color, and composition --Cowenby 04:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0163-DSC 8260-Hotel-Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, good --George Chernilevsky 17:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0142-DSC 8239-Kirche-am-Hafen-a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 17:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg-090613-0261-DSC 8358-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness, balanced composition --Maurilbert 03:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)