User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2009/August

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your message

Check the dates :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Also where in Commons policy does it say you can't look over your own edits? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

You can look over your edits as much as you like, but some of the work the admins had to invest seemed to be useles to me.

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with the Kellner image. I greatly appreciate it. Scott --Rskellner (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbern-090726-9065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Why 1.2 only? Nice quality. --kallerna 10:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't want to be relicensed without being asked --Mbdortmund 11:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbern-090726-9047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness and noise could be better, but good enough for QI. --Afrank99 12:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9330-Eingang-Orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. But adding location would be nice. --Berthold Werner 10:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and Details! --Leviathan1983 08:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and Details! --Leviathan1983 08:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BurgLüdinghausen 0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp --Lmbuga 19:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9474-Akt-Venusinsel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice (the very lower part is not in full focus, but IMHO it's not a big issue). I like the composition also if cropped a little in the lower. --Marcok 18:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duesseldorf 1966.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

archivieren --Mbdortmund (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mbdortmund, thank you for your review to File:Villa Emo Fanzolo loggia 2009-07-18 f02.jpg. I decided to upload a different version. --Marcok (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

I promoted that new, better version --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine, and the out-of-focus shoulder in the foreground is functional to donate a sense of monumentality. --Marcok 19:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like how the shadows emphasize certain elements in the image. --Ernie 23:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

[[File:|75px|center]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo!

Du musst noch den "Dieses Bild befand sich einst in einer Löschdiskussion"-Hinweis auf der Disku-Seite des Bildes setzen. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Flora Fotografie

Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!

Ich bin aus der Reise durch Krim heute zurückgekehrt. Ich habe viel neuer Fotografien gemacht.

Die Probleme mit der Fotografie der Flora sind (die rechte Seite) nicht korrigiert. Mir gefällt diese Art, aber die Qualität noch nicht das Gute.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi George,
welcome back! Ich hab schon überlegt, wo Du geblieben bist. Ich bin gespannt auf Deine Fotos!
Was genau ist an der Flora noch schlecht? Ich sehe es im Moment nicht.
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Es ist auf die rechte Grenze der Skulptur sichtbar. Die obere Hälfte. Das Weiße geht in den schwarzen Hintergrund mit der großen blauen Aureole über (CA).
mfg, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Danke, ich versuchs nochmal zu korrigieren --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Vielleicht magst Du nochmal schauen. In der größten Vergrößerung im Mozilla sieht es immer noch leicht blau aus, in der Bildbearbeitung bei 200% geht es. Was meinst Du? Meine technischen Möglichkeiten sind erschöpft. Danke für Deine Hinweise! --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


Das Ergebnis ist jetzt ein wenig besser, aber noch nicht der Ausgezeichnete. Jetzt ist die dunkle graue Aureole wegen der Editierung erschienen. Wir werden die Lösung anderer Teilnehmer erwarten. Manchmal das neue Foto zu machen es ist leichter, als zu retten der Alte.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Du hast ganz Recht. Viele Grüße und weiter gute Zusammenarbeit --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9533-Sphinx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 18:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good view, QI --George Chernilevsky 18:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9293-Eber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 12:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9515-Horn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Again nearly perfect -- Smial 00:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9558-Akt-Mann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Smial 00:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please remove guide lines -- Smial 00:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
done (x), really didn't see it... --Mbdortmund 08:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Now good. -- Smial 09:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen-090806-9625-Christoph-Bernhard-von-Galen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Neutral because of the shadow on the right side and the lack of a geocode. -- H005 19:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
geocoded, shadow reduced --Mbdortmund 22:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, better now. -- H005 22:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen-090806-9621-Godfried-von-Raesfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentI'll promote it when a geocode has been added. Potential improvements: Should have been taken more form the left because of the sunlight (if background is suitable), lower DOF would have been better. But both not enough an issue to decline QI status -- H005 19:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 Comment thx for your detailed review, Geocode added, the reaon for the camera position is a white wall behind the sculpture as to see here: File:Godfried von Raesfeld-090806-9620-Bueste.jpg, lower DOF would have been better, that is right, sorry, I was already tired... --Mbdortmund 21:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Ja, das kenne ich ;-) -- H005 22:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbern-090726-9048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentLight is not ideal because the castle looks so much darker than the sky and the green, but because of the otherwise good quality I'll promote it when the tilt is removed. Also, I propose to crop it to become symetrically. -- H005 18:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thank you for the exact review, please have a look at the new version --Mbdortmund 17:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, much better, also the sharpness has improved a lot! -- H005 18:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9266-Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good, QI --George Chernilevsky 18:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9356-Orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 18:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9297-Nordwestturm-mit-Orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 18:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9304-Nordbruecke-mit-Loewentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice reflection --Ianare 20:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9399-Orangerie-Loewe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. -- H005 11:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9298-Nordwestturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. --Jcart1534 22:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9925-Wiesenkirche-Westportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9911-Wiesenkirche-Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Excellent point of view --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9908-Wiesenkirche-Portal-Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 09:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9884-Fachwerk-Filzenstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9886-Fachwerk-Filzenstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9852-Cafe-am- Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 13:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9885-Fachwerk-Filzenstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 14:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9802-Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Meine Fotografien der Tiere

Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!

Meine Fotografien der Tiere auf dem Sand ist eine Arbeit im Studio. Ich habe die Grundstücke mit dem grauen und gelben Sand vorbereitet. Der Spinnen und anderer Tiere pachtete aus der privaten Sammlung der Tiere ab (private Zoo). Die Spinnen wirklich groß (wie die Untertasse für den Tee aus dem Service) und giftig. Mein junger Sohn des Alters dreizehn Jahre half mir. Er auch der gute Biologe. Er versteht vorsichtig, mit den gefährlichen Tieren zu behandeln. Er fing der Schlangen in der wilden Natur und der großen Krabben auf dem Meeresgrund schon. Die Spinnen zeigen wenig Aggression, wenn die langsamen Bewegungen zu machen sie oben nicht zu berühren. Man kann nur unten die Handflächen, und später langsam ersetzen, sie zur nötigen Stelle verlegen.Genauso fotografierte ich des Skorpions. Ich nahm die Kamera und machte die Fotos, und mein Sohn gab das Tier auf den vorbereiteten Sand zu dieser Zeit aus. Es war etwas Tage. Die Tiere sind zum Besitzer zurückgekehrt, niemand hat gelitten.

Ich habe zwei Verwundungen nur von der Krabbe in der wilden Natur bekommen. Es war die sehr grosse Krabbe am Ufer des Meeres. Ich nahm Macro nahe ab. Die Krabbe hat mich bis zum Blut stark gefasst. Ich habe die Kamera auf den Sand fallen gelassen, aber die Optik hat nicht gelitten. Ugh... Es ist der Verlust der Vorsicht.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Danke für die tolle Geschichte! War das eine von diesen großen, roten Krabben, die so lecker schmecken? Bei uns nennt man die de:Königskrabbe. --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


Nein, die Königskrabbe kann oder abreißen die Finger brechen. Mich griff ähnlich dieser Krabbe File:Eriphia_verrucosa_2008_G2.jpg, nur sehr groß an. Ich unbedingt die Fotografien der Krabbe in der Zukunft.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ich freue mich schon auf die Bilder! --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Zugleich: Ihre Abstimmung kann dieser schönen Krabbe retten (wenn er gefällt) Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Lithodes.santolla.JPG
--George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090822-10140-Osthofentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 17:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090822-10128-Turm-St-Petri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 17:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

QI

Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!

Die QI Notizen:

  • Ich habe den Kommentar anlässlich der Neigung Ihrer Nomination abgegeben. Ich bin fertig, nach der Korrektur zu unterstützen.
  • Machen Sie bitte die Formatierung QITotal in den Diskussionen. 48 Stunden sind für eine Spinne zu Ende gegangen.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

QITotal [x]
Danke
Bei dem Bild bin ich nicht mehr sicher, ob das real schief war oder nicht, guck ich mir später nochmal an.
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe noch einmal angeschaut. Das gute Ergebnis, wenn:
Adobe Photoshop / rotate canvas / Arbitray 1.1 CW
Später muss man den Himmel färben Adobe Photoshop / Clone Stamp Tool
Ich weiß nicht, wie es, deutsch zu sagen (Software national interface).
mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Danke für den genauen Hinweis. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


Guten Tag!
Ich habe die FI Nominationen zwei Spinnen gemacht.
Bitte, schauen Sie es zur freien Zeit an
mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

ShiftN

Hallo Mbdortmund,

danke für deinen Hinweis auf ShiftN bei meinem QI. Die SW ist echt hilfreich. Viele Grüße --Harke (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Wenn's um die Korrektur in der Senkrechten geht, ist das Tool wirklich nett. Wenn auch die Waagerechte gerade werden soll, finde ich MV's Tool ganz nett, ist ein Photoshop-kompatibles Plugin. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
ShiftN ist ja nicht als vollständiges Programm zur Objektivkorrektur gedacht :-) -- smial (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi smial, willkommen im Chat *g* --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Danke für den link. Photoshop habe ich nicht, Photoshop Elements will ich mir besorgen, dann werde ich es testen. Gruß --Harke (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9986-Fachwerk-Osthofenstrasse-59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me ---George Chernilevsky 12:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Fisch und Foto

Ich fischte vom Kescher. Es ist der Fischfang mit den keine Haken. Ich verwendete das Fleisch der Krabbe für den Köder. Ich fotografierte den Fisch speziell für Commons und sofort entließ. Ich sortierte vor kurzem die Fotografien für alles Tage. Dieses alte Männchen wurde mir vier Male geraten. Es kann man nach dem einzigartigen Muster auf der Haut erkennen. Er mag das Fleisch der Krabbe sehr :P. Er hat das Essen wie das Fotomodell verdient. Jedoch wurde er mit der Zeit vorsichtig und nicht mehr kam ins Netz, er schwamm näher nur heran und sah mich. Mir ist es angenehm, zu denken, dass er jetzt lebendig ist und wahrscheinlich ist ein Anführer des Rudels.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9864-Rathaus-Giebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 16:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9793-Potsdamer-Platz-Dresdner-Bank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 15:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9862-cafe-Siebrecht-Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 15:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-10018-Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot and good detail. J.smith 04:14, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-10044-Potsdamer-Platz-Schwanenapotheke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot! The chipped paint and other imperfections that are easy to see in this picture really make it interesting to look at. --J.smith 04:14, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090816-9860-Markt-Cafe-Siebrecht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 15:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)