User talk:Mbakkel2
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Solvang.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pindrmenigheten Betania, Larvik.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Rogestuen,Tollerodden.jpg was uncategorized on 28 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tidligere telegrafstasjon, Larvik.jpg was uncategorized on 30 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Storgata 26.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tidligere Kaffistova.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Storgata 28.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Storgata, Larvik.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Torstrand torg 8.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Vestre Halsen.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Greveveien 46, Larvik.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Greveveien 28.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Hus i Gamle Kongevei 2.jpg was uncategorized on 20 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Hus i Gamle Kongevei 1.jpg was uncategorized on 20 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Tollerodden
[edit]Hei! Jeg la inn kategori på dette bildet: Image:Rogestuen,Tollerodden.jpg og fjernet samtidig at det var ukategorisert. Du får sjekke om du er enig i kategorien, men jeg tror det ble riktig. Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hei Anne-Sophie Ofrim! Jeg er helt enig med deg. Dette er rett kategori. Mvh. Mbakkel2 14:52, 28 aug 2010 (UTC)
Files renamed
[edit]Hi,
I renamed your two files.
Don't hesitate to add description in English too in your files, that's the quickest way to get translations in other languages (e.g. I regularly translate into French the images I process' descriptions) --Dereckson (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kirkestredet_11,_Larvik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vidariv (talk) 09:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Typisk commons, sletter det man vil beholder, og beholder det man sletter. Vidariv (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:1-OB.F05816a.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1-OB.F05816a.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:1-OB.F05816a.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hei!
- Tipper du har hentet bildet fra www.digitaltmuseum.no? Der kan du se at retighetene til bildet tilhører Norsk folkemuseum. Dette bildet er lisensiert under koden CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 NO, som etter hva jeg har lært, dessvere betyr at den ikke kan lastes opp på Wikipedia. Beklagelig at mange bruker så strenge lisenser, og det er flere viktige personer som ikke har portrett på Wikipedia på grunn av dette.--Frankemann (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Blander meg. ;-) NC betyr no commercial og vi kan ikke bruke den lisensen på WP. Til Mbakkel2; mulig den brukes på Lokalhistoriewiki, der er reglene annerledes. Tilføyelse etter å ha sett på Oslobilder; er det dette bildet http://www.oslobilder.no/OMU/OB.F05816a ? Det kan vi laste opp, det har riktig lisens. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Er lenken riktig? Personen på bildet er oppgitt til å være Niels Christian Ditleff, i tilegg til at personen ligner svært lite på den salige statsminister John Lyng.--Frankemann (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Det er Niels Christian Ditleff, fra Larvik som jeg er. På engelsk Wikipedia er det et bilde av Lyng. Dette: [1]Mvh. Mbakkel2 (diskusjon) 22:23, 14 July 2014 (CEST)
- Ja, ser jo at det er Ditleff og ikke Lyng, jeg søkte bare opp koden som var oppgitt på det opplastede bildet. Jeg er så gammel at jeg husker Jon Lyng og hvordan han så ut. ;-) Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Det er Niels Christian Ditleff, fra Larvik som jeg er. På engelsk Wikipedia er det et bilde av Lyng. Dette: [1]Mvh. Mbakkel2 (diskusjon) 22:23, 14 July 2014 (CEST)
- Er lenken riktig? Personen på bildet er oppgitt til å være Niels Christian Ditleff, i tilegg til at personen ligner svært lite på den salige statsminister John Lyng.--Frankemann (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Blander meg. ;-) NC betyr no commercial og vi kan ikke bruke den lisensen på WP. Til Mbakkel2; mulig den brukes på Lokalhistoriewiki, der er reglene annerledes. Tilføyelse etter å ha sett på Oslobilder; er det dette bildet http://www.oslobilder.no/OMU/OB.F05816a ? Det kan vi laste opp, det har riktig lisens. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Peter Lykke-Seest.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Peter Lykke-Seest.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Here is the source: [2] As you see the license is alright. Mbakkel2 (talk) 12:04 (CET). 6 January 2015
- No! You did not show the source and the license was incorrect - until I fixed them. You should have done that when you uploaded the image. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Gertrude Thanhouser.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gertrude Thanhouser.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- I found it here: [3] Mbakkel2 (talk) 12:12 (CET), 6 January 2015
- Don't tell me. Add the information, including the OTRS permission to your upload. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:John Lyng.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:NFB.23264.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:NFB.23264.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Alec Robertson.jpg
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/45px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
![NC](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Cc-nc_white.svg/12px-Cc-nc_white.svg.png)
![ND](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Cc-nd_white.svg/12px-Cc-nd_white.svg.png)
![Copyright](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Copyright.svg/12px-Copyright.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![SA](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/15px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
![CC0](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Cc-zero_white.svg/15px-Cc-zero_white.svg.png)
![PDM](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg/15px-Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg.png)
Elisfkc (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Smithegården på Skottebryggen i Larvik.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Smithegården på Skottebryggen i Larvik.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Smithegården på Skottebryggen i Larvik.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Elie Beauregard.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Elie Beauregard.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Elie Beauregard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:George Black (speaker).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:George Black (speaker).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:George Black (speaker).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)