User talk:MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Exact duplicate

Hi. "Exact duplicate" is a high condition, and different file type, and different derivations are not exact duplicates and fail the test for speedy deletion. If you think that it should be deleted then please put it through a deletion request process. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I see no response to @Billinghurst from last December yet. Perhaps, you can comment.
On January 3, 2023, here: [1] you wrongly tagged a file as an "exact duplicate." It was not an exact duplicate.
Please, take more time to compare files before using any criteria for speedy deletion, especially tagging files with the "duplicate" tag. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Victory Day Parade 2005-9.jpg

File:Victory Day Parade 2005-9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alex Spade (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Files of Senate of Poland

Check Template_talk:Polish_Senate_partnership. So it seems that you are not doing a right thing. Masur (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Masur Opened a related discussion. Now I'm waiting for an answer. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

High image quality version from the Russian Presidential Press and Information Office

First of all, thank you for having found a high quality version of the file File:President Putin laying a wreath at a monument to the liberating Soviet Army in Pyongyang.jpg, this kind of contribution on Commons is quite underestimated and I'd like to thank you for this good modification!

So I'm asking you for something else, could you find high quality for these other similar photos ?

Thank you very much! — Koreller (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Copying a large number of photos of officials, etc

Hi! There is no need to add all the official meeting photos from government websites. Wikipedia is not a file hosting service for officials; a few photos for articles are enough. Photos that are not valuable to the Wikimedia Commons will be deleted. And also for each photo you need to give a description. Rtfroot (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

@Rtfroot As for the numbering of photographs, it will be temporary and exists to facilitate uploading photographs (for example, they are listed in the order given on the website of the Russian Ministry of Defense). In the future, they will be renamed - this takes less time than uploading photos to Wikimedia Commons. Also in the future there will be uploading of photographs from Sergei Shoigu’s working trips around Russia and abroad - there are 127 of them in the album and they will also temporarily be in order. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I have to agree with Rtfroot here. It's really helpful or practical to upload every single image of Sergei Shoigu twiddling his thumbs at a random meeting over the last 10 years or whoever long. And the explanation for why did that makes zero sense. Especially the bit about renaming files files int he future. As if that has anything to do with it. Regardless, next time it would be better you if just picked the best ones out of the set and uploaded them instead of just indiscriminately uploading every image from the Russian Ministry of Defense's website while expecting everyone else to deal with them. And just an FYI, but it looks like the links to the original images on the Russian Ministry of Defense's website don't work because of them blocking IP addresses outside of Russia from accessing it, which really doesn't help. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
It seems you don't understand what I'm talking about. I'm saying that you are uploading a lot of photos that are of no value to the community and Wikipedia (random official handshakes, etc.), a few photos are enough, but you are downloading all the photos from official sites. Wikipedia is not a file hosting service. There is no need to add all the photos from every trip of government officials. In addition, you poorly format the uploaded photos (incorrect names, incorrect sources, often no description, etc.). By the way, where do you get improved copies of old photographs? This is AI upscaling am I right? Rtfroot (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Adamant1, @Rtfroot: I understand this very well - I try to upload only the important, and if necessary, only in high resolution (for example, on the Kremlin website there is a section Putin. 20 years at http://20.kremlin.ru, where the best moments of Vladimir’s presidency and premiership are posted Putin from December 31, 1999 to December 2019).
Meanwhile, here the photographs are uploaded in high resolution and I am happy to post them on Wikimedia Commons. In turn, on the main website of the Russian President, photographic materials from 2000-2009 have a resolution of 500x334, which is extremely low quality for large computers. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Where do you get high resolution photos for old ones? If this is AI upscaling, then this must be explicitly stated. AI upscaling of old photos is not the same as original. Rtfroot (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding such requests: an image can be renamed without the redirect only if this image is not used. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@MasterRus21thCentury: Apparently your still uploading every random image of Sergei Shoigu against our requests and sources to the original files still don't seem to be working. Plus you seem to be redundantly adding Sergei Shoigu to the images along with a "Sergei Shoigu" by year category. When only the by year category is necessary. Can you at least fix the problem with the dead sources and stop adding the pointless parent category to the files if your not going to stop uploading them completely? You still aren't adding descriptions as requested either and a basic level files need both sources and descriptions to be hosted on Commons. Especially sources. It does no good if they are just links to blank archive.org pages though. So please fix it and the overcategorizing. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Adamant1 As for archived pages, they are usually removed from the current list, while photographs remain on the servers of the Russian Ministry of Defense website, and the pages themselves are not archived.
Currently, I have completely completed the series of uploads of photographs of Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu and will now be distributing them by year. Either way, this could make excellent material for Wikipedia articles and Wikimedia Commons galleries. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
No offense, but I don't care about or understand the insider baseball in regards to how your doing this whole thing. But you clearly didn't get the images from the archive.org links since they are blank pages. So just fix the sources so they point to the actual places where the images are being hosted. I don't care if that's archive.org, mil.ru, or somewhere else, but the sources clearly need to be corrected since they don't work as things currently stand. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Move requests

Hi. It is the file mover's decision whether to create a redirect or not. Also, a file mover cannot move a file without leaving a redirect if the file is in use on any Wikimedia wiki. So you actually don't need to write in almost every of your move requests I have seen that you don't want a redirect. If it really does matter to you, I do recommend to directly choose a right name or leave the file name as it is. Thanks and take care Killarnee (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, you did it again. If you ignore me, I will ignore your ”Reason: rename withown redirect“ statement. As I said it's not my opinion, it's a Commons rule and with the file move tool it's even technically not possible to uncheck the leave a redirect box if the file is in use. Killarnee (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee The fact is that I want to ensure that the files I uploaded are easier to find in the Foundation’s projects - for example, I am now working with photographs of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, and I am also working on concretizing all the available photographs. For example, this happened with high-resolution photographs of Vladimir Putin. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Moving files is not the problem. The problem is that you want me not to leave a redirect behind, but that's just not possible. Killarnee (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee Okay, I’ll try not to leave a rename request without redirects then. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh dear. Special:diff/850302827. I cannot move the file without leaving a redirect because the file is already in use. What's so difficult to understand about it? Killarnee (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee You can understand that there will be an empty space on Wikipedia. And if there is not a single case of use in the Foundation’s projects at the time of renaming, then I carry it out without redirection. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Please read the Commons guidelines for file renaming. It's very clear that your current request to move the files without a redirect is violating the guidelines. If there are further move requests like the previous, I will just decline the requests. Have a nice day Killarnee (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Mvd.ru

Template:Mvd.ru has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Senatinform.ru

Template:Senatinform.ru has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Спутник астероида (1999-10-06).jpg

File:Спутник астероида (1999-10-06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gikü (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Zhirinovsky 2015-06-29.jpg

Добрый вечер, MasterRus21thCentury. Заметил, что вы видоизменили вышеупомянутый файл. Не сказал бы, что соглашусь с решением поменять вырезанный портрет на полное фото, т.к. этот файл используется в инфобоксах (en:2012 Russian presidential election, kk:Владимир Вольфович Жириновский, ru:Выборы в Государственную думу (2016)) и иных таблицах (en:2024 Russian presidential election#Opinion polls) и новый вид файла вместе с «соседними» файлами выглядит не очень. Предлагаю вернуть старую, вырезанную версию. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@Malik Nursultan B А вот может быть в таком случае залить новый файл заново и откатить старый назад? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Приднестровье

Привет, попрубую на сайте Правительства убедить разместить лицензию, как на сайте Президента и МИД ПМР. Kodru (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо за отзыв! Очень долго ждал Вашего ответа. В идеале лучше единая открытая лицензия по примеру {{GJSTU-2.0}}. Ещё также хочу сказать, что на форуме белорусской Википедии я открыл обсуждение, поскольку я планирую отправить письмо в пресс-службу белорусского президента с просьбой перевести сайт http://president.gov.by на свободную лицензию - у них крайне невнятный копирайт, а также сложности с подачей обращения ввиду того, что для регистрации на портале нужен белорусский номер телефона. Между тем, я живу в приграничном регионе (город Брянск) и мне самому выезжать в условный Гомель за покупкой симкой очень невыгодно, а виртуальные номера часто используют мошенники и несут потенциальные правовые риски.
Ещё просьба следить за списком, который я собираюсь переносить на Мету из-за закрытия ВМ РУ. Сам я между прочем убедил Минюст России перевести сайт на свободную лицензию, равно как и правительство Краснодарского края. В настоящее время жду ответов от Минтранса и Минкультуры России, а также нескольких правительств российских регионов. МИД России также учтёт мои пожелания по использованию информации сайта - его политика в области АП самая строгая из главных российских министерств в отличие от Минобороны, МЧС и некоторыми другими.
В свою же очередь убедить ввести свободную лицензию на сайтах постсоветской страны гораздо легче, чем 15 или даже 5 лет назад. 15 лет назад это было просто нереально, но Russavia стал вики-героем России за перевод кремлёвского сайта на свободную лицензию (он таковым и по сей день является), а также получение разрешений от нескольких российских дипведомств и авторов фотографий по теме российской авиации. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Ilham Aliyev in China

Category:Ilham Aliyev in China is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Architektur-Drahtgewebe.jpg

File:Architektur-Drahtgewebe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Датировки фотографий с mos.ru

Уважаемый участник, вы залили на Викисклад кучу снимков с mos.ru, поставив им параметр "неизвестная дата". При этом дата у них содержится в названии файла: File:20210906 NOV 8848.jpg - 6 сентября 2021 года. По этой дате легко выясняется, где и по какому поводу изображён на снимке господин Собянин. Было бы любезно с вашей стороны, если бы, заливая фотографии, вы давали себе труд выяснить, что же это вы такое заливаете, и указать в описании. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

@Андрей Романенко Хорошо, в ближайшее время постараюсь переименовать все загруженные мною файлы. Но здесь главная проблема в том, что мои загрузки в русскоязычном разделе практически не используются, хотя несут большую практическую пользу (пример тому - снимки с дочерних kremlin.ru доменов http://putin.kremlin.ru и http://20.kremlin.ru - в первом значительная часть фотобанка в высоком разрешении, в другом все высококачественные снимки и часть из них опубликована впервые). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Я думаю, что вам следует подать заявку на разблокировку в АК русского раздела, запросив разблокировку основного пространства под обещание в течение полугода использовать доступ к русскому разделу только и исключительно для добавления иллюстраций и больше ни для чего - и с правом запросить смягчение этого ограничения при условии полного отсутствия замечаний к вашей деятельности по истечении этого срока. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 22:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Images of Russian soldiers

Hi. I'm not sure if it's something you'd be interested in doing, but I found a cool account on Flickr OTK 61 that has some older images of Russian soldiers and some other stuff that might be worth importing. I'd do it myself but I'm pretty busy and don't know how to use Flickr2Commons anyway. So I thought you might want to do it. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 10:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

@Adamant1 Useful idea! But I will first ask permission from the author. Meanwhile, do you have any new ideas for converting Russian and post-Soviet sites to free licenses and finding Flickr accounts from Russia with free Creative Commons licenses? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
OK. Not really. I assume anything out of copyright for the normal reasons could be downloaded from Flickr regardless of what license the uploader puts on file. Like there's a lot of cabinet cards and the like in the Vintage Russia group that are supposedly "all rights reserved", but they can still be uploaded to Commons because of how old they are regardless. I don't think it's worth asking the users for permission in a situation like that either. Let alone is it necessary. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

File:RIA-837198-Original.jpg

File:RIA-837198-Original.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 17:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Идентификация политиков в изображении File:Russian and Kazakh delegations meet in Astana (2023-11-09).jpg

Здравствуйте, коллега! Хотел бы попросить вас, пожалуйста, помочь с идентификацией политиков-членов российской делегации во время этой поездки Путина в Казахстан. Я может большинство казахстанских министров на фото узнал, но вот с российскими я совсем не знаком. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done - работал с ТАСС по составу российской делегации. На выходных будет визит российского президента в Узбекистан MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Спасибо большое. Буду на чеку Malik Nursultan B (talk) 01:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Палац Фреденсборг вид зі сторони парку.jpg

File:Палац Фреденсборг вид зі сторони парку.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For services in the matter of transferring the content of government websites to a free license! Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 22:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Please don't ...

Hi. Please don't upload a different variation of a file, as you did at File:Volodin with Erdoğan.jpg, then go and mark that new version as a duplicate. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

@Billinghurst ✓ Done MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
You misunderstood, or I explained it poorly. You uploaded a cropped variation of that file over someone else's work, and that should not be done per Commons:Overwriting existing files. Then you marked that new version as a duplicate of another version. We allow for variations of the same work, it is not the purpose of Commons:Duplicate to remove different variations of works or to stop variations of works existing. Users who wish to have a different educational purpose of an image should be able to do so.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Eduard Son.jpg

Уважаемый коллега, на загруженном вами 14 июня 2024 года файле изображён не покойный академик ru:Сон, Эдуард Евгеньевич, а другой человек, существенно моложе. AntipovSergej (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Если что, файл уже перезаписан. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Глубокоуважаемый коллега, вот портрет академика Сона Э. Е. [[2], которого я знал лично. Буду благодарен, если вы найдёте возможность для удаления ошибочно созданной вами категории Викисклада Category:Eduard Son. AntipovSergej (talk) 10:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
А вот самого Эдуарда Сона на фотографиях конца 2012 года нету? Могу перекроппировать ещё раз. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
В групповом фото конца 2012 года Эдуард Сон отсутствует. Вы ошиблись с атрибутированием уже два раза. AntipovSergej (talk) 11:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Вот кстати Engelberthumperdink мне в помощь - он специализируется на Татарстане. Пока категорию не надо удалять. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Я потому и не стал размножать фотографии, а просто загрузил скопом все вручения, потому что там непонятно кто есть кто, кто пришёл, а кого нет. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Erot Zaripov.jpg

Это не Эрот Зарипов (вы видите как он выглядит?), а Абрек Абзгильдин. Вы рандомно вырезаете изображения и привязываете их к рандомных людям? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Рандомность не использую, а смотрю согласно фотографиям по КДИ. Сейчас быстренько исправлю. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saparmyrat Nyýazow, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vladimir Putin 2000 presidential inauguration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dmitry Medvedev, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

File:В. И. Астахова и С. А. Семёнов. 2012 года.jpg

File:В. И. Астахова и С. А. Семёнов. 2012 года.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Козярук Светлана (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

com:speedy delete

Hi. Please reread the criteria for speedy deletion. Also, please do not revert an admin in the course of their duties. Declined is declined, if you don't like it follow the process, not revert. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

@Billinghurst So, will I have to submit it for removal using a separate procedure? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
No, I did it. Should have labelled it with a G7 speedy delete the initial time, or as it had been declined, could have just pushed it through as a DR.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrei Sakharov.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Схема Замку Фреденсборг.jpg

File:Схема Замку Фреденсборг.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leonid Brezhnev.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

How to upload picture?

I have my account, but sometimes I upload picture and later the picture were deleted, it is what happened? Upload new picture have any law needs to follow or not? 2402:1980:250:F1FC:0:0:0:1 12:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mukah_Iskandirov

Category discussion warning

Mukah Iskandirov has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Malik Nursultan B (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Mickevicius-Kapsukas.jpg

File:Mickevicius-Kapsukas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 05:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hi MasterRus21thCentury. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting the subpage, transclusion, year, month, day, and notice to the page creator. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jeff G. I originally used the {{Speedydelete}} template there, but this time I forgot and made a big mistake. Please accept my apologies. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 12:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Telewizja Polska

Telewizja Polska has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 11:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heydar Aliyev, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heydar Aliyev, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories for stamps versus postage stamps

Just an FYI but there was a CfD like last year where it was decided that images of postage stamps should go in categories for postage stamps instead of "stamps." Then the regular stamp categories can be used for other types of stamps besides one's usage for postage. Ergo, why Category:Postage stamps of Armenia existed (and exists again since I recreated it). So I'd appreciate it if you didn't go around needlessly deleting categories for postage stamps against the consensus. The same goes for changing things related to them on Wikidata's side. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

@Adamant1 It turns out that the categories Stamps and Postage stamps for one country can coexist and not be deleted? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 04:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Yeah I think so. There's a few countries where I don't think we have "stamp" categories because all the images are for postage stamps. In that case I'd say there's no reason to have both. But if there's images of both postage stamps and cinderella it makes sense to have a top level "stamps of country X" category in that case. I don't think we need a "stamp" category if all have is images of postage stamps for that country. Otherwise your just creating the categories as some kind of check the box excericse instead of because it serves an actual purpose. But that's just my own personal preference and I can't think of a country that would have postage as well as cinderella stamps anyway. Maybe North Korea? Who knows. But don't just create "stamp" (or any other reason) categories for no reason. That's all I'm saying. I don't control that anyway do I? --Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Центральный элемент мемориала в Хацуни.jpg

File:Центральный элемент мемориала в Хацуни.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi MasterRus21thCentury, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Queen of Hearts (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Queen of Hearts Thank you! MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2024&oldid=942061748"