User talk:MartinThoma/Archive 1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3d-function-7.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the minus 5 should be omitted, it can be confused with the x-axis (see my note). Elsewhere good quality. --Cccefalon 08:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I removed the -5. --MartinThoma 09:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodylus-johnsoni-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita-muscaria-side-inversnaid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 00:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plant-texture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Danke für die Berichtigung der Beschreibung! --Hubertl 08:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Normal-distribution-cumulative-density-function-many.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rectangle-varignon.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3d-function-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lda-gauss-1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-exteriour-angle-theorem-1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-tikz.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Nehmen und Geben

Hallo Martin, QIC ist keine Service-Platform sondern ein Projekt, das vom Mitmachen lebt. Wer regelmässig seine Photos dort bewerten lässt, von dem wird erwartet, dass er sich auch an den Reviews beteiligt. Ich schlage vor, dass Du Dich mit den Bewertungsregeln etwas vertraut machst und Commons:Image_guidelines liest. Du kannst erst mal solche Bilder bewerten, bei denen Du Dir zweifelsfrei sicher bist, ob sie die genannten Kriterien erfüllen oder nicht. Wenn Du Dir unsicher bist, suchst Du Dir ein anderes Bild aus. Als Regel für regulars in QIC gilt, dass für jedes nominierte Bild ein anderes Bild bewertet wird. Vielen Dank für Deine Mithilfe. Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Cccefalon: Ok, alles klar. Ich habe damit gezögert, weil ich bei einige Bildern die zurückgewiesen wurden nicht sehe warum. Insbesondere ob ein Bild scharf ist oder nicht kann ich einfach nicht erkennen. Aber ich werde mich mal daran versuchen :-) --MartinThoma (talk) 11:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Prima. Wie gesagt, fang erst mal mit einfachen Bildern an. Es gibt auch einige regulars, wie z.B. Johann Jaritz, Jacek Halicki, Hubertl, Poco a poco, Christian Ferrer und andere, die seit langer Zeit dabei sind und die überwiegend fehlerfreie Bilder abliefern. Da kannst Du Dich am Anfang mal dort orientieren, wenn Du unsicher bist. Eigentlich haben alle, die hier eine Weile dabei sind, dazugelernt und die typischen Fehler gewöhnt man sich schnell ab. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Dem schließe ich mich an! --Hubertl 12:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innsbruck-Stiftskeller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, it´s far better! Thanks. --Hubertl 09:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Normal-distribution-cumulative-density-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See my note: the dotted lines should not extend to this area but end at the x-axis --Cccefalon 04:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC) @Cccefalon: Thank you, I didn't see that. I fixed it. --MartinThoma 07:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Thanks for correction. Figures should always stand free of underlaying solid, dashed or dotted lines. This makes the readability much better. --Cccefalon 10:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perceptron-unit.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some graphical issues, see my annotations. --Cccefalon 10:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality.  Comment Please leave comments about fixing issues here in QIC rather than in the file talk. you can also add the {{done}} tag (which end up as  Done in the text) to highlight your efforts. --Cccefalon 11:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC) --Cccefalon 11:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ECB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I am not a friend of those protruding arrowheads, however, it is good quality. --Cccefalon 10:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pairing-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my annotations. --Cccefalon 12:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your review. I fixed all 3 issues you mentioned. --MartinThoma 18:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Well done! Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feed-forward-perceptron.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments While it is a good idea, the graphical implementation is too chaotic and sketchy at the moment. It needs a better rendition to become QI. I left you three general annotations to clarify my point. --Cccefalon 10:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Not your best one but with the modifications and the tighter arrowheads, it is acceptable for QI imo. --Cccefalon 09:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Random-image.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Highly educational. Please add one empty line after every nomination. --Cccefalon 20:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CBC-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two issues: Alignment of cross in the circle and one arrowhead diving to much into the outline. --Cccefalon 10:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I've just fixed it. Thank you for the review.--MartinThoma 23:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CBC-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two issues: Alignment of cross in the circle and one arrowhead diving to much into the outline. --Cccefalon 10:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I've just fixed it. Thank you for the review.--MartinThoma 23:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CFB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some adjustments necessary, see my note. --Cccefalon 10:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I've just fixed it. Thank you for the review.--MartinThoma 23:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restricted-boltzmann-machine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CFB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Extended-euclidean-algorithm-runtime de.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my proposals in the annotations. --Cccefalon 06:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I moved the legend to the left and the label of the x-axis down. The reason why I have the German "Schritte" in the image is because I think it is the best solution. I thought about introducing a new function which counts this number, but this would be much harder to read for everybody. So I think a good solution is to make it easy to generate a localized version by simply using a text field for this text. Usually, there is (was? currently it seems to be broken) a good tool which made the creation of localized SVGs trivial. --MartinThoma 07:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. The internationalisation of a chart is only an option and is not impeding a promotion as QI. --Cccefalon 11:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigmoid-function-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't get the sense of using white dashes for the y-values of 0.4 and 1. Also, when using one decimal place after the decimal point, it should be consistent within the whole axis -> use "1.0" instead of "1" please. Same goes with the other nominations of this set. --Cccefalon 07:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Done I fixed the precision of the y-axis tick labels to 2. I have no idea what you mean with white dashes for y-values 0.4 and 1 ... there are gray dashes, but for all y-axis (and x-axis) ticks. --MartinThoma 05:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. No idea, what you did, but the dashes have now all the same colour. Good! --Cccefalon 06:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigmoid-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same as previously mentioned. Additionaly, the fraction line in the equation is too thick. --Cccefalon 07:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC) I made the y-axis ticks have a fixed precision of 2. I don't think the fraction line is too thick, I think it looks good like this. --MartinThoma 05:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Don't know what else in the code you did, but after your edit the fraction line issue also disappeared. --Cccefalon 06:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Thank you. I still don't see the issues with the gray line / the fraction line. I didn't change anything in the generating TeX code, but I used different tools to make the SVG. Could that be a problem of the SVG renderer? (Which one are you using? - I use Chrome / Inkscape. --MartinThoma 09:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ECB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One arrowhead is diving too deep into the squares outline --Cccefalon 07:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Done Interestingly, this was a problem of my LaTeX code being converted to SVG. The LaTeX was fine, the pdf was fine, the SVG (with an older conversion tool) was not. --MartinThoma 05:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You could re-evaluate my photography.

Glebionis_coronarium

--Harpagornis (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Harpagornis,

Although I like your photography very much, it has one issue: The tip of one leaf at the top is cut away. According to a much more experienced Commoner (User:Cccefalon) this is a no-go for QI.

I'm sorry. --MartinThoma (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygon-is-point-inside.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OFB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OFB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parse-tree.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, one question: Is it ok, that the description uses italics for the variables,while the diagram use regular font?? --Cccefalon 05:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Thank you for mentioning it. I'm not too sure about it. On the one hand, I think variables in Text should always be as LaTeX produces them. On the other hand, in the image I think non-italic is better. I'm not sure if it is important that the font style is the same in the graphic in the text, but I've adjusted the text.--MartinThoma 15:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udp-package-scheme.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-exteriour-angle-theorem-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I made some annotations. Don't arrange the cahracters too much mathematically but try to get a feeling about harmonic arrangement: Das Auge isst mit. --Cccefalon 13:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the remarks; I'm very used to assume that LaTeX does simply the best, but after having your annotations I can clearly see that there is stuff to improve manually. --MartinThoma 17:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Well done! Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dot-product-5.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-heights.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-heronian.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-labels.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-right-abchpq.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Da hängt noch was von Dir in CR ....

... und zwar hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Isosceles-triangle-more.svg

Vermutlich ist das Deiner Aufmerksamkeit entgangen. Das sollte doch zu verbessern sein. Du kannst es nach einer Ablehnung auch renominieren, falls der Fehler beseitigt wird.

Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cccefalon: Danke, ja, das habe ich übersehen. Ich habe es korrigiert. --MartinThoma (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-stewarts-theorem.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isosceles-triangle-more.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-perpendicular.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my annotations --Cccefalon 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC) I've adjusted the image - however, getting the points away from the line is really hard. This was the best I could achieve. It is important not to make the triangle one of the special cases (e.g. equilateral) --MartinThoma 22:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Much better; the points are no more kissing the lines. --Cccefalon 08:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-gergonne-point.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my annotations. --Cccefalon 05:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Done I've added the label and an explanation. --MartinThoma 09:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyperbolic-triangle-interior-angles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-circles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-angles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pse see my annotation. --Cccefalon 10:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Done I fixed the problem. --MartinThoma 12:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thales-circle-triangle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isosceles-triangle-tikz.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle-escribed-circles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle-circumscribed-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I left a note for further enhancement. Beside that, qood quality. --Cccefalon 06:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --MartinThoma 11:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-unit-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle-pappus.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 10:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EmiMa-042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Photo-phylles 2017

Hi,

I just found lots of interesting pictures on your pages.

I suggest you have a look to my website http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

We would be honoured if you accept to participate! It's completely free.

Best regards Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC) (administrator of the french Wikibooks)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bobblehead-figures.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 12:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:069-Barcelona.jpg

File:069-Barcelona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto _talk 11:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear MartinThoma,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:EmiMa-021.jpg

And also:

• File:EmiMa-022.jpg
• File:EmiMa-023.jpg
• File:EmiMa-024.jpg
• File:EmiMa-025.jpg
• File:EmiMa-026.jpg
• File:EmiMa-027.jpg
• File:EmiMa-028.jpg
• File:EmiMa-098.jpg
• File:EmiMa-099.jpg
• File:EmiMa-100.jpg
• File:EmiMa-101.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Sealife-Munich-Octopus-2.ogv, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I have used some of your photos

Hello Martin!

I have used two photos of Stenopus hispidus in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)

You can see directly in the follow link and clic over "Siguiente" ("Next"):

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=52860

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Martin+Thoma

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 06:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Soca-trail-20.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 00:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)