User talk:Marlaguette
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Albert Marquet par Henri Matisse, vers 1905.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Alinea (talk) 12:54, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo collection Grasset Pour mon plaisir (avant 1937).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo collection Grasset Pour mon plaisir (avant 1937).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 07:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment savez-vous que ce logo est dans le domaine public ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 17:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Parce qu'en 1937, le logo change pour la même collection : voir File:Logo Grasset Collection Pour mon plaisir.jpg : est-ce que c'est une raison valable, Racconish, et si oui comment la faire figurer ? --Marlaguette (talk) 21:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Non, ce n'est pas une raison valable. Savez-vous qui est l'artiste ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Non, évidemment, Racconish, et rien ne prouve qu'il soit mort depuis plus de 70 ans, puisque tel est le problème si je comprends bien…
- Là encore, tant pis pour la reproduction du logo isolé, mais si je comprends bien aussi, c'est pour la même raison que pourrait être supprimée la couverture du livre qui orne l'infobox de l'article ? Une couverture, même d'une édition moins ancienne, peut-elle être au contraire librement reproduite dès lors qu'il n'y a aucune illustration mais que des caractères ? Cdt, --Marlaguette (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oui, s'il n'y a aucune originalité graphique, {{PD-text-logo}} peut s'appliquer. Peut-être est-ce le cas de la page de titre de l'édition originale. Sinon, vous pouvez aussi recadrer. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 08:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Non, ce n'est pas une raison valable. Savez-vous qui est l'artiste ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 21:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- La page de garde de l'édition originale comporte aussi un dessin, et le recadrage de la couverture au-dessus du logo n'est guère heureux.
- Pensez-vous, Racconish, que quelque chose dans ce goût-là File:Couverture DG Grasset.jpg pourrait faire l'affaire, bien que je n'en connaisse pas l'année ? En outre les informations sont peut-être à reprendre.
- Pardonnez-moi toutes ces demandes et errances — et je crains que ce ne soit pas fini… Bien cordialement, --Marlaguette (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oui. Il faudrait donner une année approximative avec {{Between}} ou {{Circa}} et supprimer la licence {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 11:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Drôlement mieux ! Je n'avais pas pensé à regarder chez Rakuten. J'ai procédé aux changements tant dans l'article sur David Golder que dans celui sur Irène Némirovsky elle-même. Merci infiniment, et à un de ces jours — je le crains — pour mon plan de l'église de Cheylade… Bien à vous, --Marlaguette (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oui. Il faudrait donner une année approximative avec {{Between}} ou {{Circa}} et supprimer la licence {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 11:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Photographies de tableaux
[edit]Hello, du point de vue de Commons, la reproduction photographique d'une œuvre en deux dimensions est une opération qui ne donne lieu à aucun droit d'auteur. Il convient donc d'indiquer à chaque fois comme auteur celui de l’œuvre originale, par exemple Marquet, et non le photographe ; et corrélativement, d'indiquer que l’œuvre est tombée dans le domaine public ou que son créateur a accordé une licence compatible avec Commons (il faut alors transmettre l'autorisation à OTRS); mais pas que le photographe est l'auteur et encore moins qu'il met la reproduction sous licence CC-BY-SA ou CC0 . Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 07:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Help, Racconish, je n'y comprends décidément rien ! Quoique je fasse (moi comme auteur du dessin, ce qui est vrai, Rochemonteix comme source, ou comme auteur du dessin), rien n'y fait, le même avertissement apparaît toujours — même quand je prends modèle sur des images téléversées du même genre exactement et qui ont l'air d'être passées comme des lettres à la poste. Autant vous dire que je n'ose même pas m'attaquer aux autres images que vous avez pointées… Cordialement, --Marlaguette (talk) 13:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- PS : je précise bien que ce dessin, fait d'après le plan de Rochemonteix et consort, est bien mon travail : comment se peut-il que je ne puisse en user plus librement ?
- …Je suis trop sotte : je n'ai qu'à enlever le bandeau !… Mais comme je n'ai pas compris exactement en quoi je devais rectifier les images, j'ai des scrupules et me dis que ça ne sert à rien ! Enfin, je vais toujours tenter. --Marlaguette (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Plan de Saint-Léger.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Plan de Saint-Léger.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
— Racconish 💬 12:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
PS Je vous recommande de partir plutôt du plan figurant dans l'ouvrage de Rochemonteix, libre de droits. Cordialement, 12:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
PPS Ce plan est dérivé de celui de Thouin [1], pas de celui de Rochemonteix [2]. 17:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Vladimir Ghika (réduction).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vladimir Ghika (réduction).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
— Racconish 💬 12:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ce fichier-ci peut bien être supprimé, ce n'est pas grave. En revanche, pour tous les précédents, ce serait plus embêtant parce que les images sont importantes dans mes articles : aussi vous serais-je très reconnaissante, Racconish, quand vous aurez le temps, de m'indiquer si ce que j'ai corrigé va au moins dans le bon sens ! Bien cordialement, --Marlaguette (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove problem tags
[edit]
— Racconish 💬 17:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Issy-L'Évêque vers 1930.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Issy-L'Évêque vers 1930.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Issy-L'Évêque vers 1930.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— Racconish 💬 12:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Issy-L'Évêque vers 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Racconish 💬 16:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Suite française - 4ème de couverture.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Racconish 💬 07:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Château de Montrifaut.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Château de Montrifaut.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Château de Montrifaut.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— Racconish 💬 07:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Issy-L'Évêque - carte zone occupée.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Racconish 💬 07:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Bon alors, pour ça, Racconish, j'ai modifié… et vous prie instamment de mettre toutes ces maladresses au compte de mon ignorance, bien réelle même si je commence à retenir certaines choses, et non d'une quelconque volonté de tromper ou de tricher ! Marlaguette 11:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Page du manuscrit de "Suite française".jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Page du manuscrit de "Suite française".jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
— Racconish 💬 18:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
L'accord des ayants-droit me semble devoir être adressé à COM:OTRS au titre du droit d'exploitation exclusif des œuvres posthumes. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 18:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Bonsoir, Racconish, cela vient d'être fait, j'espère dans les formes voulues. À suivre, donc. Cordialement, --Marlaguette (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)