User talk:MarkMysoe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:20 Ghanaians.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 19:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nathan Retro.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 02:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The image's source can be found at (http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/2451546077/omaigdp5ozujjs6w5kph.jpeg and http://twitter.com/NATHANRETRO), the image is the work of Nathan Retro himself, and permission was given as representative to upload the File:Nathan Retro.jpeg to Wikimedia Commons to be used in his Wikipedia article. Deleting the only image of Nathan Retro from Wikimedia Commons because I am suppose to have created misleading email accounts to send false permission statements to OTRS would be sad on Nathan Retro. Please think to not delete the image as it had genuinely been released by Nathan Retro to be uploaded and used on Wikimedia Commons. MarkMysoe 07:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:David Dawood.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 02:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The image's source can be found at (http://twitter.com/#!/DavidDawood/media/slideshow?url=http%3A%2F%2Fyfrog.com%2Fobvrnrvj) the image is the work of David Dawood himself, and permission was given as representative to upload the File:David Dawood.jpg to Wikimedia Commons to be used in his Wikipedia article. Deleting the only image of David Dawood from Wikimedia Commons because I am suppose to have created misleading email accounts to send false permission statements to OTRS would be sad on David Dawood. Please think to not delete the image as it had genuinely been released by David Dawood to be uploaded and used on Wikimedia Commons. MarkMysoe 05:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ruff Sqwad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 02:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The image is in all honestly my own work. The image was taken by me using the camera of a BlackBerry PlayBook, then uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by myself. I'am not asking for me to be believed, but deleting the only image of Ruff Sqwad from Wikimedia Commons because the upload can not be trusted, as I am suppose to have created misleading email accounts to send false permission statements to OTRS, is in all action un-thoroughly thought-out and potentially unjustified. I have now been blocked, but I am not going to complain about being blocked. Please think to not delete my image as it had genuinely been released and uploaded by me MarkMysoe to be used on Wikimedia Commons. MarkMysoe 08:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Jodie Connor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 23:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goji Electronics logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 06:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]