User talk:Malyszkz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Malyszkz!

Good drawings!

[edit]

Hello Malyszkz!

You have uploaded several land vehicle drawings! They are all very good and great contributions for Wikimedia! How much work is it for one drawing? With which programs do you create them? Greets, High Contrast (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Malyszkz!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou.

[edit]

Thankyou for creating File:M4A4 cutaway.svg, it is an excellent image. Hohum (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

M4A4

[edit]

Ja cię pięknie proszę, nie pisz w opisie ilustracji takich rzeczy jak Osłona wlewu wody i prawdopodobnie paliwa. Opis musi być dobry i bezbłędny. Jeśli nie wiesz, co to jest, zostaw po angielsku. Wolf (talk) 11:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Było dobrze. Żołnierz obsługujący działo to działonowy (bo działon to jedno działo z obsługą). Wolf (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

M4A4 cutaway.svg

[edit]

Hello Malyszkz, to my knowledge there's a mistake in the picture's description. It's not a M2 Browning machine gun at № 30, because the secondary weapon at point 30 was a .30 cal machine gun, and the M2 Browning was a .50 Caliber weapon. It's one of the M4A4's two 7,62 mm (.30 cal) machine guns (M1919 Browning). The second one is mounted beside the primary weapon (not visible in the cutaway). Cf. R. P. Hunnicutt: Sherman. A History of the American Medium Tank or Chris Bishop (Ed.): Waffen des Zweiten Weltkriegs. Eine Enzyklopädie. --KaterBegemot (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:M4A4 cutaway.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:M4A4 cutaway.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transfering to Commons

[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you transfered a lot of images to Commons. We need the original upload date to find out if file can be relicensed. If you use a tool like http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonshelper.php then all information is added for you. --MGA73 (talk) 18:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fine work

[edit]

Greetings. Your PNG rendering contribution to the en:Eastern span replacement of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge is greatly appreciated. Best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also say thanks for you amazing great job on many SVG images. -- Perhelion (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the image File:SFOBBEastSpan.svg you replaced has several spelling errors so I reverted it back to the original until these errors are fixed Giggett 16:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj! Na ZB w pl:wiki zwrócono uwagę na literówkę "Poziam Fermiego". Czy mógłbyś poprawić? Pozdrawiam, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kirchhoff 2.svg

[edit]

You kindly converted my hand-drawn version of this to an SVG version. I wonder if you could make a couple of additions to it.

I would like an r0 above the line between P0 and the line which joins the aperture, and an s added above the line from Q to P.

Many thanksEpzcaw (talk) 13:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks, your work looks great :D --Vinie007 (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please check this [1] Maybe you can help with district map, Dziękuję :) --Vinie007 (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great, but could you reduce the gaps a bit more --Vinie007 (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow your really great with svg files. Can't you help me with Category:Albanian Ministries :D? --Vinie007 (talk) 20:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you could so 2 or three images it would be really great :D, Dziękuję again --Vinie007 (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Last request, can you fit it in File:Albania location Tirana.svg same style, but than with district profile you made --Vinie007 (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Man your great :D --Vinie007 (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Got a task for you :P, can you please do the same trick like you did before :P? --Vinie007 (talk) 15:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please do also File:Mitik-logo.jpg, that is looking the worst --Vinie007 (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is on Commons already if you can't upload it contact me again :) --Vinie007 (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Man it's great, can you learn me :P, i want to do all logos left :P But i can't :( --Vinie007 (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think about the other files like File:Kuvendi logo.jpg and File:Ministria e Integrimit Logo.jpg, do you think these can be vectorised. I am not sure.--Vinie007 (talk) 06:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, can you do also do File:Kuvendi logo.jpg? --Vinie007 (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you also could do File:Ministry of Health Logo.jpg and File:Ministry of Finance.jpg we are finished :) --Vinie007 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shëndet për të gjithë --Vinie007 (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you typed only Shqipërise wrong in File:Ministry of Finance.svg
Maybe you could do once File:KQZ Logo.gif? --Vinie007 (talk) 10:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again --Vinie007 (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now its my last question :P, File:Hekurudha Shqiptare.gif this simple blue logo with HSH writed in it :P], please upload it as own work because you made it by yourself --Vinie007 (talk) 15:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Check this, maybe you can autotrace it File:Flag of Tirana.png, could you please also divide the emblem of it and upload the SVG version of File:Wappen Tirana.gif? --Vinie007 (talk) 11:35, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Charles Beresford signature

[edit]

Hello. Thanks for the conversion of Lord Charles Beresford's signature, but could you rotate his signature so it's horizontal. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Can you do some wonder with File:Policia Shqiptare.png and File:Albania Police Logo.jpg --Vinie007 (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Albania map

[edit]

Hello. Would you mind cleaning this map up a bit? I also ask that the location labeled 'çhidnë' be renamed 'Çidhnë' and perhaps 'Kurfuz' to be renamed 'Corfu'. Thanks, --Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the original that you could go by: [2].--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot :) --Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please upload the map again but in a new file, the map don't update.... --Vinie007 (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Sarzan Island disappeared, could you fix that ? --Vinie007 (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! --Vinie007 (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What about File:Policia Shqiptare.png? --Vinie007 (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i will try to find a higher resolution file --Vinie007 (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map

[edit]

Can you combine this map with this one? --Vinie007 (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm oke give it a try :), only the red you have to put on the map --Vinie007 (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could you also do this you can based it on this --Vinie007 (talk) 20:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you upload this map it. It's in public domain. --Vinie007 (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you [[:File:Ministry of Public Works, Transportation and Telecommunications Logo.jpg|vectorise this]? --Vinie007 (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tändkulemotor.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good work - and very useful! --H005 14:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parts of a Bell.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorizing Signatures

[edit]

Can you create a svg signature of this image of Ranavalona III from this site which is also an image on the commons here. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch! Can you do the same for File:Father Damien's signature 1880.jpg isolating "J Damien de Veuster"?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't possibly show how much gratitude I have for you since there hasn't been any responses to many of requests on the lab page on the English wiki. Could you check out Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Signatures and see if you could vectorize anyone of them? Thanks in advance!!!--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! But can you remove the curving line connect to the line comming down from the "A" on the bottom that isn't part of the signature on File:Kalakaua R 1875 signature.svg which you can see by the different colorization on File:Kalakaua R. 1875 signature.jpg. Same with File:Archibald Scott Cleghorn 1879 signature.jpg, the bottom line is part of another's signature. Really thanks again for the great help!--KAVEBEAR (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. I only ask for you to remove the smaller line on the very bottom which is ackwardly connected to the one coming down from the leter "A" on the signature of Kalakaua. So keep A curve but get rid of the one connecting to that curve.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you vectorize the signatures here?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orbiter main propulsion system

[edit]

Hi there! Just a quick note concerning your excellent vector diagram of the Space Shuttle's Main Propulsion System, File:Orbiter main propulsion system.svg. I've always been slightly confused by the diagram as there is no LOX equivalent of the LH2 fill/drain valve on it, but I see that the original diagram you took it off did not feature one. I have, however, finally managed to locate a diagram showing the location of this valve, on page 14 of this Boeing presentation (its labelled Liquid Oxygen Fill & Drain Port), and was wondering if you could possibly add it in? Many thanks, Colds7ream (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for fixing it! :-) SalopianJames - previously Colds7ream (talk) 12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orbiter main propulsion system.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice work. --Saffron Blaze 19:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image update request

[edit]

Greetings;

200pix

Regarding File:CalDOT-SASElevPlan4Q2005P42.svg. First, thank you very much for your creation of this SVG version.

I am requesting a minor update. The original from CalTrans was deficient in that it does not show the continuity of the cable. Cables are anchored at the east (right in the image) and wrap all the way around the western counterweight (on the left). A minor, yet important improvement would be to show both the western counterweight and, on its western side, the continuation of the cable, which would be visible between the roadway boxes. The proper location for the cable would be at the left extremity of the main span counterweight, with counterweight position projected from the elevation view, seen in the current image centered on the dashed line at the left of the plan view..

Thank you,

Leonard G. (talk) 02:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PL: "Proszę o małą poprawkę. Oryginalny plik z CalTrans ma taki brak, że nie pokazuje kontynuacji liny. Liny są zakotwiczone na wschodzie (po prawej stronie obrazka) i ciągną się aż do zachodniej przeciwwagi (po lewej). Nieduż, ale istotną poprawką byłoby pokazania zarówno zachodniej przeciwwagi, jak i, po stronie zachodniej, dalszego ciągu liny, która byłaby widoczna pomiędzy powierzchniami dróg. Prawidłowe położenie liny znajdowałoby się przy lewym skraju przeciwwagi głównego przęsła, z pozycją przeciwwagi przedstawioną na rzucie elewacji, widoczną na obecnym rysunku w pozycji wycentrowanej na linii przerywanej po lewej stronie rzutu z góry."
Przykro mi, ale dla mnie ten opis jest strasznie mętny. Przypatrywałem się rysunkowi i nie wiem, o co chodzi. W każdym razie rozszerzenie rysunku nie ma chyba potwierdzenia w źródłowym PDFie, więc byłoby wg mnie ORem. Chyba że zgłaszający poda Ci adekwatne źródła. Pozdrawiam, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mlyn - budowa.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 11:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hangar.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you make the line at the intersection of the back wall and the floor a bit darker.Gauravjuvekar 14:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Already been done. Malyszkz 06:56, 18 February 2012  Support The shadow could be a bit darker and the lines a bit thinner. Otherwise an good illustration. --Niabot 18:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABC-M25A1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice vectorization, but I think your #7 and #8 are mixed up? Should be an easy fix. --Óðinn 18:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for this conversion ! Zeugma fr (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wyszukiwarka na Wiki Media

[edit]

Cześć. Zapytaj albo któregoś z polskich adminów Commons, albo w kawiarence technicznej w pl:wiki, może tam Ci podpowiedzą. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 16:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature vectorization

[edit]

Could you do anything with these signatures en:Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Signature vectorization and here?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help cropping

[edit]

Could you help me do lossless crops on these images:

Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1964 71395L-Ranger.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentGood image but the text needs reworking.--Peulle 17:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Support Good now. As always .SVG images are not affected by the size rule.--Peulle 11:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Zst gminy.svg

[edit]

Błąd jest w nazwie jednej z gmin. Powinno być Chociwel a jest Chociew. Przy okazji - Stargard już nie jest Szczeciński. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.72.207.60 (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterW zt 3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peter.wieden (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterW zt 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peter.wieden (talk) 23:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterW zt 1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peter.wieden (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]