User talk:Maddriver371
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:SS-Rottenführer Gerardus Mooyman.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:SS-Rottenführer Gerardus Mooyman.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SS-Rottenführer Gerardus Mooyman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 23:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Havik, Hans - SS-Untersturmführer.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Havik, Hans - SS-Untersturmführer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:18armee.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 15:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:18armee.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:18armee.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:I32065.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sander1453 (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
File deletion warning
|
File:Mw108388.jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.
|
The National Portrait Gallery distributes this file under a CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0 license, not the CC-BY-3.0 license you claimed. Non-commercial and non-derivative licenses are not allowed on Commons. Revent (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- ooh, misreading, sorry. --Maddriver371 (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mw125399.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mw125399.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mw125399.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
January (talk) 22:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- www.npg.org.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddriver371 (talk • contribs) 07:45, 09 August 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mw189281.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mw189281.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mw189281.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
January (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Frederik Knotzer.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 22:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Leslie Gossage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Klaas faber 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Colonel General of Police Kurt Daluege.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Colonel General of Police Kurt Daluege.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Colonel General of Police Kurt Daluege.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EarlySARanks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SAPoster1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Mw114364.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mw114364.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Mw114364.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Reichsleiter post - 1939 insignia.xcf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ids de Beer.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:N.H. Bontekoe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:David van Voorst Evekink.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:David van Voorst Evekink.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:Mw48669.jpg
- File:Mw65996.jpg
- File:Mw102438.jpg —LX (talk, contribs) 13:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Colonel General of Police Kurt Daluege.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 07:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Admiral Sir Bertram Ramsay.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 03:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
havenweg 39 harlingen
[edit]https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Casper_Di_Robblestraat_2B.jpg is gekoppeld aan Havenweg 39, dat is niet juist
- Geen idee wie dit hierop heeft gezet maar, catagorie verwijderd. --Maddriver371 (talk) 12:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Diederik Lutke Schipholt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wilhelm Rediess.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hermann Höfle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Heinrich Müller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Siegfried Taubert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Reichsleiter Wilhelm Grimm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Theobald Thier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Dr. Karl schapper.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Scharfe, Paul - Obergruppenführer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Evert100 (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Adolf Gerteis (1886-1957).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Adolf Gerteis (1886-1957).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Adolf Gerteis (1886-1957).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello JuTa, I changed the lincense. Greetings, --Maddriver371 (talk) 13:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jan Olij.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trijnsteltalk 20:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:De nieuwe generaal-veldmaarschalken van de Luftwaffe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Karl Franken en Friedrich Alpers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt (1892-1964).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Konrad Henlein (1898-1945).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Konrad Henlein (1898-1945).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bürckel, Hess, von Schirach.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Bürckel, Hess, von Schirach.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bürckel, Hess, von Schirach.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Niet een beetje overdreven? Ik had nog geen licentie bij gezet. Iets te snel? Vr.gr.--Maddriver371 (talk) 10:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Burckel-Oostenrijk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Constantin Baron Digeon von Monteton (1886-1944).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Constantin Baron Digeon von Monteton (1886-1944).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Hermann Reinicke (1870–1945).jpg
- File:Johann von Braun (1867-1938).jpg
- File:Konrad-Oskar Heinrichs (1890-1944).jpg
- File:Kolonel Hans Bergen aan het Oostfront.jpg
- File:Heinrich Danckelmann (1887-1947).jpg
- File:Albrecht Baron Digeon von Monteton (1887-1946).jpg
- File:Constantin Baron Digeon von Monteton (1886-1944).jpg
- File:390. (Feldausbildungs-) Division.gif
- File:Friedrich Karl Klausing (1920-1944).jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2006-0819-500, Heinz Harmel, SS-Brigadeführer u. Generalmajor (cropped).jpg
- File:Thomas Fraser McCrorie (1917-1943).jpg
- File:Caspar Sprock (1922-1945).jpg
- File:Joseph Berry (1920-1944).jpg
- File:Winifred Wagner, Friedrich Kampfler, Fritz Wachtler.jpg
- File:Mussolini begroet Hitler.jpg
- File:221-SD.gif
- File:Bogislav Axel Karl Ulrich Graf von Schwerin (1892 - 1944).jpg
- File:Ferdinand Čatloš (1895-1972).jpg
- File:FileVault 2 2020-01-29 om 11.43.42.png
- File:Rudolph Otto von Budritzki (1812-1876).jpg
- File:Franz Büchner (1898 –1920).jpg
- File:Oliver von Beaulieu-Marconnay (1898-1918).jpg
- File:Armand von Alberti (1866-1919).jpg
- File:Insigne Heeresgruppe Nord.jpg
- File:Theobald Thier (1897-1949).jpg
- File:Heinrich von Prittwitz und Gaffron (1889-1941).jpg
- File:Paul Ritter von Kuenßl (1862-1928).jpg
- File:Heinz Hellmich (1890-1944).jpg
- File:Graf und Freiherr Carl Friedrich von der Goltz (1815-1901).jpg
- File:Karl Friedrich Wilhelm von Gersdorff (1763-1829).jpg
- File:Wilhelm Falley (1897-1944).jpg
- File:Vietinghoff en Kesselring, 1944.jpg
- File:Friedrich Mieth (1888-1944).jpg
- File:Burckel-Oostenrijk.jpg
- File:Bürckel, Hess, von Schirach.jpg
- File:Willem van der Neut (1919-1983).jpg
- File:Generalleutnant Siegfried Westphal (1902-1982).jpg
- File:Erich Hartmann voor zijn Bf 109 (G-6).jpg
- File:Majoor Graf bezoek Messerschmitt fabriek Augsburg.jpg
- File:Fallschirmschützenabzeichen des Heeres 57er.jpg
- File:COLLAGE standarte Stabsführers.jpg
- File:Wandbord 'Evacués, Franeker.jpg
- File:Verzetsmonument, Rijksweg, Herbaijum.jpg
- File:Bevrijdingsmonument, Jan Bogtstrastraat, Franeker.jpg
- File:Monument aan de Zilverstraat, Franeker.jpg
- File:Gauleiter Joseph Bürckel (1895-1944).jpg
- File:RK KVK ohne Schwerter.jpg
- File:Ernst Wilhelm Bohle (1903-1960).jpg
- File:Liberator-monument Ameland.jpg
- File:Gedenksteen Ameland.jpg
- File:Gedenkbank Ameland.jpg
- File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg
- File:Leo Geyr von Schweppenburg (1886-1974).jpg
- File:Karl Franken en Friedrich Alpers.jpg
- File:Adolf Gerteis (1886-1957).jpg
- File:Walter Warzecha (1891-1956).jpg
- File:Jürgen von Kamptz (1891-1954).jpg
- File:Tonny Ahlers (1917-2000).jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mussolini begroet Hitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:FileVault 2 2020-01-29 om 11.43.42.png
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FileVault 2 2020-01-29 om 11.43.42.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:390. (Feldausbildungs-) Division.gif
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:390. (Feldausbildungs-) Division.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:390. (Feldausbildungs-) Division.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg and File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg
[edit]Hi. You have nominated to deletion two of your own files (File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg and File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg). Are you sure it's really what you want to do? If so please add a rationale for the deletion. More generally I've put the template {{no permission since}} on some of your files. They are two problems indeed: 1) you say they are public domain because the author died more than 70 years ago but most of the the time you don't mention the author's name neither his date of death (e.g. File:Wilhelm Burgdorf (1895-1945).jpg and several others) 2) websites you mention as sources are not an evidence of first publication more than 70 years ago (Internet doesn't exists back in 1945). So you have to modify the file description with the actual name of the photographers and their date of death and an evidence of publication more than 70 years ago or choose another license template. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Patrick Rogel, I can't give you the date of death of photographer from Burgdorf because I don't know it. The photographer of the Gedenkraam Ameland is me! I as photographer of that Gedenkraam Ameland give Wiki permission to use it. I hope this wil give some clarity. Greatings,--Maddriver371 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg has no problem; it was a mistake. I was talking about the long liste above. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oké, that makes it clearer, the hole list come's from this website Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe the give in the Price list of Services diclaimer for the use of there photo's. If the author is called al put it in the description of the photo. Greatings, --Maddriver371 (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Once again you nominated one of your file to deletion. If it's for not replying in the new deletion request this move is absolutely useless. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gedenkraam Ameland.jpg has no problem; it was a mistake. I was talking about the long liste above. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ferdinand Čatloš (1895-1972).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 06:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Maddriver371, als je 't mij vraagt, zou deze category best ondergebracht worden in een category die iets met anciënniteit te maken heeft. Category:Seniority lijkt mij echter niet echt een correcte benadering in het Engels. Thanks en cheers. Lotje (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ja, lijkt mij een goeie. Zijn alle Categorieën niet in het Engels? Dit vanwege het Commons is. Vr.gr. Maddriver371 (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Maddriver371: inderdaad, zo zou ik het normaliter ook zien, maar gezien Sk!d (Sk!dbot) bij Wikidata zowel Dienstalterslisten der SS (Q1220898) als Seniority list (Q1220885) aanmaakte en McSearch Dienstaltersliste der Schutzstaffel der NSDAP, Stand vom 1. Dezember 1936 (Q63098423), weet ik het ook niet meer. Category:Seniority lists misschien?
Cheers. Lotje (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dan maar Category:Seniority lists. Groeten, Maddriver371 (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Maddriver371: inderdaad, zo zou ik het normaliter ook zien, maar gezien Sk!d (Sk!dbot) bij Wikidata zowel Dienstalterslisten der SS (Q1220898) als Seniority list (Q1220885) aanmaakte en McSearch Dienstaltersliste der Schutzstaffel der NSDAP, Stand vom 1. Dezember 1936 (Q63098423), weet ik het ook niet meer. Category:Seniority lists misschien?
![]() |
File:Elk Eber (1892-1941).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |