User talk:MOs810/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Zaproszenie do Wikiekspedicji

Cześć w tym tygodniu udajemy się do Wikiexpedycji na wschód województwa dolnośląskiego. Jest to wielodniowa fotografia grupowa wiosek i miast w regionie w celu uzupełnienia brakujących zdjęć w Wikipedii.

Śledzimy tradycję polskich wypraw organizowanych przez członków Wikimedia Polska. Podobała nam się ta koncepcja w Czechach, więc w 2016 roku odbyliśmy naszą pierwszą wyprawę na granicy czesko-polskiej na Górnym Śląsku (raport końcowy). Teraz wracamy do Polski po trzech latach.

Obserwowałem, że lubisz robić zdjęcia i masz szerokie spektrum. Dlatego piszę do ciebie, jeśli nie masz czasu i chęci dołączenia do nas w tym tygodniu. Zapłaciliśmy za transport i zakwaterowanie z dotacji Wikimedia Polska. Juandev (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Forged Figures Park Donieck 2012 (3).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: FoP-Russia
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Iruka13 (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Forged Figures Park Donieck 2012 (2).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: FoP-Russia
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Iruka13 (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Jaka Rosja????? Przecież Donieck jest na Ukrainie! Więc jaka Rosja?!! MOs810 (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi MOs810, are you sure PD-Polish law is also valid for drawings? The template speaks only of photographies. --Túrelio (talk) 12:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Liguda Alojzy, werbista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gestumblindi (talk) 10:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Witaj. To Twoje własne zdjęcia?... dobrze by było, gdybyś podał prawidłowe daty wykonania, nie 2016. Pozdrawiam. Pibwl (talk) 12:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Ale, please, uzupełnij tabelki we właściwym miejscu, bo nie chcę tego robić za Ciebie :) Pibwl (talk) 12:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Możesz proszę wskazać w źródle konkretną uchwałe RM czy inną uchwałę ustanawiającą wzór tych biletów? Masur (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Sarajevo Hadz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Topienie koronawirusa, Jeziora Babskie 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Plac Langego

Czy możliwe byłoby doprecyzowanie położenia miejsca wykonania zdjęcia powyższej kapliczki o współrzędne, miejscowość, gminę?VVerka5 (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Jestem prawie pewien (dawno to było), że to tu: 50.2616050N, 17.4405456E . Na googlach to słabo wychodzi, ale jak wpiszesz w Mapy.cz, to nawet pomnik jest zaznaczony. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 11:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Aragonit

[1] - błędnie wpisałeś kategorię - kłm. Laskowa jest w Kostomłotach, ale świętokrzyskich. W tych dolnośląskich zresztą nie ma i nie było żadnego wyrobiska, gdzie mógłby być aragonit. Poprawiłem. Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Zapytanie o miejsce wykonania zdjęcia

Cześć,

Znalazłem Twoje, bardzo zresztą interesujące zdjęcie:

Chciałbym zapytać, gdzie zostało wykonane, w jakim miejscu/muzeum/wystawie? Pytam ponieważ opis na tej ekspozycji nie uwzględnia jednej rzeczy: oryginał został odnaleziony w Museum für Naturkunde w Berlinie przez Johannesa Müllera w 2008 roku i nawet mamy na Commons jego zdjęcie:

Serdecznie pozdrawiam! --Gower (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Chelmno, cat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PseudoSkull (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Poznańskie zdjęcia

Szanowny Panie (Pani), bardzo dziękuję za najlepsze regionalne zdjęcia.
Jest prośba, gdyby mógł Pan przejrzeć Poznań w wersji en i ewentualnie wziąć pod uwagę potrzeby regionalne w tym roku. Bardzo brakuje jakiegoś sensownego zdjęcia Malty (z widokiem na kopiec najlepiej, chyba za szeroko by i kopiec i główne trybuny ująć) + drugie ewentualnie jakieś efektowne na wzór istniejącego (tu akurat przydałoby by się podczas jakichś zawodów), może też jakaś panorama miasta bo istniejąca kiepska (to trudne akurat zadanie bo wybrać by trza jakieś sensowne miejsce do tego jeszcze + wiadomo pogoda). Arena to czekamy na remont, to bardzo ładne no ale trochę straszy na razie, stadion na Bułgarskiej brakuje foto no ale akurat to to brzydkie i albo jakieś zdjęcie z wnętrza z meczu albo mamy istniejące foto z lotu ptaka. Autostrada by się przydała po upgradzie do trzech pasów ale tu też jakiś najlepszy wiadukt by trza wybrać. Może Pixela dałoby sie ładniej ująć no i na dworcu jakiś nowoczesny tabor na najlepszym peronie bo istniejące trochę "brudne" to zdjęcie (jakby niepoznańskie). Politechnika nie ma żadnego sensownego zdjęcia. Taki koncert życzeń, przepraszam, ja trochę chory, siedzę w domu i wymyślam... Pzdr.
PS. Najlepsza chyba "mała" panorama miasta tutaj [2] (wybrać Poznań albo tutaj) - genialnie widać rodzynki (jest okrąglak któremu chyba też brakuje sensownego zdjęcia) i brak jakichś ewentualnych straszydeł, nawet do nich napisałem w sprawie uwolnienia z licencją odpowiednią ale siedzieli cicho. To przydałoby się powtórzyć to ujęcie moim zdaniem w trochę szerszej wersji. Lorem333Ipsum (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

W miarę możliwości wyjdę naprzeciw, jednak nic nie mogę obiecać z uwagi na sprzęgnięte inne liczne zadania. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 11:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Saint Nicholas church in Kidów (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kennyupper (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Edward Sowiak

Hej, nie zrobiłeś może zdjęcia [3] w szerszym, kadrze, albo nie masz może zdjęcia sąsiedniego grobu? Jest tam pochowany [4]. Pozdrawiam Mateusz Opasiński (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Pomoc, mapa dzielnic Poznania

Witam, prośba o ewentualną pomoc w zakresie kontaktu z potencjalnie odpowiednią osobą, która mogłaby zrobić nowy png (optymalnie svg) z mapą poznańskich dzielnic (tych głównych starych). Mamy tylko takie pstrokate png i warto by zrobić coś a'la istniejący podział administracyjny (ciemniejszy żółty na szarym tle). No i wtedy wystarczy svg bez napisów a jedynie z zakreślonymi grubszym granicami wewnętrznymi. Ja takich nie robiłem (a że choruszek może kiedyś zrobię) no ale dla wprawnego to minuta lub 5 pracy. Gdyby dałoby się to komuś podrzucić byłbym wdzięczny.
PS. Piszę w odniesieniu do zawartości wiki en. Pzdr. Lorem333Ipsum (talk) 14:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shashlik Mariupol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Serbska Witosa Poznan, luty 1993r.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Panek (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bukowno 2022 (2).jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bukowno 2022 (2).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   21:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Prunus domestica, mirabelka (2).jpg

Das ist keine Mirabelle, sondern mit 99%iger Sicherheit eine Kirschpflaume. Siehe auch: [5]

This is not a mirabelle, but with 99% certainty a cherry plum. See also: [6] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.199.25.167 (talk) 18:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Tymon Niesiolowski, 1933, Po kapieli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Wrzesnia, fingerpost, lata 40 XX w (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Psia Górka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Matlin (talk) 06:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear MOs810/Archive 2,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Oradea, pomnik poetów (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Francesco Marino Liberty Monument Fontenay.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Grabia w rejonie Kolumny i Baryczy (2) kabanos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Novic84 (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Jarosław Brzozowski, kadr z filmu Miejsce na lato.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polimerek (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Władysław Daszewski, kostiumy, Zemsta, Fredro, 1962.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Wyjątek w prawie autorskim na który się powołałeś dotyczy wyłącznie fotografii, a nie prac o innym charakterze (rysunki, rzeźby, kostiumy). Prace Daszewskiego będą PD w 2042, chyba, że da się wykazać, że powstały przed 1.1.1954 w ramach etatowej umowy o pracę (a nie umowy o innym charakterze). Ankry (talk) 19:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
No przecież to jest fotografia, a nie kostium. MOs810 (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)