User talk:MJJR/archive 2012 (part 2)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search



MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2012 (part 2)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussels Cinquantenaire R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2024 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Dunes R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Zwin R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo, nice composition.--ArildV 21:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU777 R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 15:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU751 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Iifar 15:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU560 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Dunes R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Dunes R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 09:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Mercury R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiber Else-Marie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and interesting photo -- George Chernilevsky 09:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU971 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would be better if sharpened, but good enough. Mattbuck 21:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Skyline R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Bad R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 19:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Locs 2609+2623 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karnak Khonsu Temple R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bocaina Strait R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please see the notes. --Iifar 07:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you for your remarks. Spots removed. -- MJJR 08:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC).  Support Good quality for me now. --Iifar 08:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Annunziata R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Remerciements

Merci d'avoir ajouté le modèle Image de Qualité à mon fichier "Fleur de géranium" promu puis "oublié" par le bot ! Je ne sais pas très bien ce qui se passe : j'ai un autre fichier dans le même cas "Angoulême_Marguerite_2012". Les deux ont été promus, versés dans le dossier Archives de juillet et je n'ai pas reçu l'avis habituel sur ma boîte mail, le logo vert n'apparaissant pas sur les pages des fichiers concernés. Je vois que vous avez réparé un oubli. Dois-je faire la même chose avec l'autre fichier ? (Je suis Wikipédien depuis bientôt un an, mais je ne me suis pas encore fait à tous les règlements !). -- Merci encore, bonne continuation pour vos photos.-- Cordialement. JLPC (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Nouveaux remerciements pour vos conseils concernant mon fichier et pour vos encouragements photographiques. Je viens de faire un tour sur votre impressionnante galerie (où j'étais déjà venu de temps à autre) et j'ai cliqué sur le lien "Gebruiker:MJJR". J'ai alors constaté que j'ai... un an de plus que vous. Je suis donc un débutant tardif puisque je n'importe sérieusement des photos que depuis mai : le contact avec d'autres et la visite des galeries comme la vôtre me permet de progresser dans le domaine de la photo numérique ("avant" je faisais du noir et blanc). -- Bon week-end dans votre ville magnifique où j'ai passé quelques jours en décembre 2010, sans mon appareil photo mais avec beaucoup de plaisir. -- Très cordialement. -- JLPC (talk) 21:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Mon Repos R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Mon Repos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Vlacherna R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 21:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Vlacherna R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 21:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crossrail DE6310 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 06:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU631 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU631 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rurtalbahn Class66 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU222 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC) (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU746 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agia Kerkyra R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agia Kerkyra R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1831 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Mon Repos R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 21:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Mon Repos Temple R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 11:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Mon Repos Temple R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Chalikiopoulou Lagoon R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 07:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU645 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU635 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Speelmansrei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Markos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Pantokrator Monastery R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Moerstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ezelstraat R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 17:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Peter Benoitlaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Legeweg R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Amandsstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Jacobsstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Zilverstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Moroder 23:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Markos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Markos R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Spyridonas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Spyridonas Beach R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Hoefijzerlaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU608 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Dijver R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Leeuwstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Gistelse Steenweg R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU968 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU779 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU197 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Lake Antinioti R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Iifar 15:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Giststraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 11:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU208 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Haneburger 10:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Hoogstuk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2003 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Nieuwe Concessie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 06:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kusttram R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kusttram R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Freren Fonteinstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 06:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Zwarte-Leertouwersstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2007 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2012 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2012 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Locs 2901+2021 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Lighthouse R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU171 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU621 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU171+621 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Fonteinstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Florstein 07:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Vette Vispoort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Moerstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Pottenmakersstraat R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Goudenhandrei R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Heilige-Geeststraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Oude Burg R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a cw tilt in the middle, but still good imo. - A.Savin 08:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Stadhuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Kerkstraat 37 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.-ArildV 20:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Huis Sint-Jan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Huis De Grote Sterre R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Poitevinstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments weak support, but I think it's a QI. The bike in the bottom left corner is disturbing, the sharpness could be better and the white areas are bit overexposed, but nice architectural study, good image. --Carschten 14:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Commons Barnstar
885 quality images and 17 featured images!! Your great contributions are appreciated. INeverCry 20:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeebrugge Sint-Donaaskerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeebrugge Gemeentehuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeebrugge Admiraal Keyesplein R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Calvariebergstraat 12 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadzand Mariakerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Standbeeld de Ruyter R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Oranjemolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Iifar 07:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Gevangenpoort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 02:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Beursgebouw R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Categorising quality images

Hi MJJR,
I have noticed today that you categorised some of your files that were recently promoted to Quality images (I got an e-mail notification): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. I would very much appreciate it if you could add edit summaries to your edits, as this eliminates the need to actually check an edit when receiving e-mail notifications; more reasons why adding edit summaries is helpful are listed on the page on Meta. Thanks, odder (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breskens Vuurtoren R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. good composition --Herzi Pinki 23:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zuienkerke Schoeringekapel R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Iifar 11:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Stadhuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Blankenbergse Steenweg 262 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen Station R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Assessment difficult: the picture is very good in itself, but the car in front is really disturbing, and it is not your fault... I stay  Neutral and need other opinions.--Jebulon 08:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuivekenskerke IJzerdijk 89 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westouter Kosmos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 06:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IJzendijke Markt 8 Gevelsteen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IJzendijke Molen R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 06:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hof van Vivenkapelle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ten Poele R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge De Patente R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Blankenbergse Steenweg 182 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivenkapelle Vierschare R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Pieterskerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudzele Lentestraat 1 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivenkapelle Bradericplein 21 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The shadow on the foreground is a bit harsh, but main subject looks very good. --Iifar 17:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Palais Gallien R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Enamo 21:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Cimetière Chartreuse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 21:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Cathédrale R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Palais Rohan R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Jacobsstraat 63 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Jetée d'Eyrac R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 21:28, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Jetée Thiers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 21:28, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Mériadeck R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 21:28, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Gare R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 01:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Casino R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Mériadeck R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is modernism from the 70s. Good catch --High Contrast 23:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Demande d'avis

Marc,

Puis-je me permettre de te demander ton avis sur la demande de suppression de cette image.

Bonne soirée et merci d'avance

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Marc,

Merci pour ta réponse rapide.

En ce qui concerne le concours, tu dois rester optimiste car j'ai vu que tu avais de bonnes chances classer des photographies dans le résultat final. On aura certainement l'occasion d'en reparler dans les prochaines semaines.

Bonne soirée,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear MJJR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 22:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Sinarades R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition is somewhat random, but otherwise OK to me. - A.Savin 19:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Pelekas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diksmuide IJzer R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klerken Sint-Laurentius R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Oostmeers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Westmeers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sample ~QI. Biopics 18:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 Question What do you mean by "Sample ~QI"? -- MJJR 22:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. --Kadellar 12:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
The crop is a litte odd, a bit too much sky and street, but the quality is ok. --Esquilo 14:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Katelijnevest R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment chromatic aberration in tree --Rjcastillo 00:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Comment I'm sorry. mistake in promotion --Rjcastillo 19:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 Comment I don't see any CA on my LED screen; other opinions? -- MJJR 22:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I can't see anything either. QI for me. --Kadellar 12:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, j'ai modifié cette photo pour enlever le reflet en bas à droite. Mais lorsque j'ai importer la version modifié (à plusieurs reprises), elle ne s'affiche pas. Pouvez-vous m'aider ? Bourgeois.A (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

J'ai regardé votre photo des houillères de Ronchamp et tout me semble en ordre: la tache de lumière dans le bas a disparu. Mais le problème que vous mentionnez ne m'est pas inconnu. J'ai éprouvé exactement la même chose il y a quelque temps. Apparemment, lorsqu'on apporte un changement à une image que se trouve déjà un certain temps sur Commons (quelques mois ou quelques années), le changement ne s'affiche pas immédiatement. Ce qui donne l'impression (erronée) que le changement n'a pas été enregistré. Alors on essaye de nouveau et encore, comme vous l'avez fait. Je me demande si de tels changements ne doivent pas être avalisés par un administrateur de Commons avant d'être visibles. De toute façon, en de tels cas il suffit de patienter quelques heures ou quelques jours, et généralement tout s'arrange. Cordialemant -- MJJR (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC).
Merci pour l'info. Cordialement. Bourgeois.A (talk) 20:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Faro de Maspalomas R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 07:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Dunas de Maspalomas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 07:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Puerto de Mogan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 07:26, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Faro de Maspalomas R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 18:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Denoise sky

Hi Marc!

I used Gimp with Wavelet denoise plugin. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 19:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Dunas de Maspalomas R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 02:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Charco de Maspalomas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 02:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Barranco Tabaquera R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Barranco de Maspalomas R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 16:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 20:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Shopping Center R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Gilliskerkhof R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (+ nice view). - A.Savin 10:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Predikherenrei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Dunas de Maspalomas R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Moroder 11:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Bourse R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI. - A.Savin 10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Puerto de Mogan R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice colors and DEF --The Photographer 23:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Dunas de Maspalomas R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great colors. --King of Hearts 23:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Charco de Maspalomas R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Saint-Bruno R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think you are right, but still something looks unnatural to me Poco a poco 21:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Maison Larrieu R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI - A.Savin 23:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Plage R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Janshospitaal R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oedelem Weg naar Sint-Kruis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. - A.Savin 13:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ezelstraat 18 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 15:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Quai Louis XVIII R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Selbymay 10:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Janshospitaal R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 10:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Paseo de Meloneras R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Canaria Santa Lucia iglesia R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. - A.Savin 22:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Grand Hotel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sluis Molen De Brak R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 14:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Sinarades R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 14:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Faro de Maspalomas R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Notable noise level on the sky --Iifar 18:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)  Info New version uploaded. --Iifar 18:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Good to me, inspite of (see the note) ;)--Jebulon 14:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcachon Gare R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Brugge Langerei R02

Hello Marc (MJJR),

I wanted to let you know that we were interested in using your image for small digital samples in our retail stores. Credit would be given, likely posted on the back of the sample, following the guidelines established for Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). If you have any questions please let me know. I also wanted to say that I enjoyed the opportunity to view your photography on Wikimedia Commons (the Mt. Sinai photo brought back memories for me.)

File:Brugge Langerei R02.jpg

All the best,

Chris

Canada, BC

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Canaria Santa Lucia de Tirajana R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good quality.--ArildV 23:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Agios Gordis R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:GC Dunas de Maspalomas R04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GC Dunas de Maspalomas R04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Paseo de Meloneras R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Canaria Santa Lucia de Tirajana R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me --DKrieger 22:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Agüimes R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--DKrieger 22:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Paseo de Meloneras R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 17:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Canaria Santa Lucia de Tirajana R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Girondins R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I'd see the picture without cropping it --Rjcastillo 15:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. It shows only a detail of the whole big monument. --Kadellar 13:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Paseo de Meloneras R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Pelekas Agios Nikolaos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budapest Széchenyi Baths R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Theresianenkerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koolkerke Rode Poort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice.--ArildV 09:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Discalsenklooster R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Achilleion R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, even if the light could have been better. --Selbymay 08:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Achilleion R11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loc SNCFT 040DM267 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint Anna ter Muiden Kerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow! --Berthold Werner 07:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisseweegs Vaartje R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Panagia Mandrakina R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Panagia Mandrakina R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:27, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Achilleion R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some pillasters and columns in background are maybe a bit overexposed, but good for QI--Jebulon 16:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Brugge Koningsbrug R02.jpg

Dag Marc Ryckaert, volgens Sint-Annarei wordt de Sinta-Annarei overspannen door de Molenbrug, de Sint-Annabrug en de Strobrug, maar ik zie geen Koningsbrug, weet jij het misschien? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkerke R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support : very good work. --JLPC 22:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkerke R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness soso, but ok overall --Poco a poco 22:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Beste Wensen

Marc,

Beste wensen voor u en uw familie !

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)