User talk:Lymantria/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 ← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

File:Prostomis_mandibularis.jpg

Author: Stanislav ...

I don't think so, I think it is Udo Schmidt

Click provided link on image source page, to flickr -->for convinience, direct link--> https://www.flickr.com/photos/coleoptera-us/22352849828/in/photolist-8zeNsq-a9VnD4-nrw5Tq-aACfzb-nrw6id-ytd6pF-A4fcuy-xNbMXt-xKLiSF — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubikolRamios (talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although these pictures have the same species displayed, one can see it is not the same specimen. Lymantria (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q1D4QEQM3Z.jpg

Is this image free to pass as the web site cliams when no license or PD statement is given? What do you think? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License appears to be cc-0. I marked the image. Lymantria (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This DR

I don't think this DR can closed as a keep but rather a delete. Anyway, it seems to have been forgotten. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrelia albifera.jpg

Dear Admin Lymantria,

I remember mentioning on October 31, 2017 to you that it would be a pity if this image was deleted since it was heavily used. Well this image was deleted and then the source was found and the image restored again. But if you know where the image was used, please feel free to add it on Wikipedia. I remember it was more than just one webpage and this was one of them but there were other pages too. It is indeed a miracle that you found this image's source. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it in some obvious pages. Lymantria (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unmarked Mushroom images

Dear Lymantria,

If you have time, please consider marking some Mushroom Observer images here uploaded by Sasata long ago. I marked many...but there are many more. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Lymantria,

Those 2 images above have been marked but could please mark this image which I just uploaded below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Lymantria (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final request of 2017

Dear Lymantria,

This is an old 2006 image original and (2012 crop) image below but the license link appears to have disappeared. But it is a Dutch website so you may have better luck verifying if it is free....than me. Its a heavily used image.

Have a Happy New Year for 2018. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done And a very happy new year to you too! Lymantria (talk) 08:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images DRs from December 22 Here

Dear Lymantria,

Most of the DR's on this user's talkpage above from December 22 can be closed as delete but where an image is used, I suggested some replacements if possible. I don't know if you deal with DR's but the uploader has not been active on Commons since September 2016. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into it, but probably not today - did one already. Lymantria (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These 3 images from the Surinamese state

Do you know the license for these 2 images. From the Google translation, the source doesn't seem to say the images are actually PD. Secondly, I can't find the image source for the second image. The website is in Dutch.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images are free, but not cc0. I corrected and marked them. Lymantria (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zygaena hilaris.jpg

Do you know what to do with this image which was uploaded long ago from a cc by 3.0 website and the image no longer exists there. Do I tag it as no source? The uploader is familiar. Internet archive does not work with the source link. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about this. Note this version. The author clearly is the author of the website. That makes that previous publication there is more than likely. Still, not certain and checked. Personally I would give it benefit of the doubt, but I would not dare mark it. Lymantria (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anabolia nervosa.jpg

File:Anabolia nervosa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

81.231.247.194 22:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tricholoma murrillianum 692073.jpg & File:Tricholoma murrillianum 406608.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

Could you please kindly review these 2 images that I uploaded? Wikicommons does not have any species of this mushroom at all. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thank you, nice images. I think the species did not have picture, because it is often considered a synonym of Tricholoma magnivelare. Lymantria (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


2 images for review?

Dear Lymantria,

I have been marking many many unmarked MO images today and I decided to upload these 2 images below because the only original image in its category from 2011 is quite low resolution for 2017/2018. Can you mark these 2 images please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You note

Dear Lymantria,

Thank you for reviewing those images which I uploaded. I thought that you were busy this weekend. I may have 2 last ones later and then I am finished with MO. As for this DR can all uses of the image under DR be replaced with the image I susggested. Sadly...it was never reviewed until many years later. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hypomyces category names this species but there are no images on Wikicommons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I am busy indeed, this weekend, but time enough to do some short reviews :) Lymantria (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • When you have time, perhaps you are comfortable to mark (pass or fail) this Dutch image:
  • File:Udo Kock.jpg

I cannot read Dutch well and don't know if the image is really free. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 final images from MO

Dear Lymantria,

Can you kindly mark these 4 images from MO. I am definitely finished with uploading images of mushrooms and fungi that don't exist on Commons.

This is the last batch. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 images from MO?

Dear Lymantria,

Could you mark these 5 images from MO please? I was going to stop but after I checked on Commons, I saw that some of these mushroom species don't even exist or only have 1 image in their category on Wikicommons like this case.

PS: Its very strange. One user had a flickr account and on his flickr account all his images were ARR but on MO, they were CC BY SA 3.0. I guess he did not understand copyright well. But I did not upload any images from that MO account. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A difference between licenses at Flickr and MO is not that strange. Often an uploader thinks differently later when uploading to the other platform. Or perhaps does not understand all. Marked the (6) images. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you can, please mark these 3 images of mushrooms which Commons also does Not have.

These are the last mushrooms. I promise. Thank You for your help, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done You forgot to license the latter two... I repaired that. Lymantria (talk) 08:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • My apologies. Uploading images from MO can take a lot of time. That is why I have now stopped uploading images from MO. The only mushroom I would be happy to get an image for is for this article but there are few images and they are not free at either flickr or MO sadly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absurd renaming

Your picture has been renamed to an absurd name : File:Coryphaena hippurus Spain.jpg Could you do something? Lmaltier (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an absurd name, but correctly identified as Coryphaena hippurus. Lymantria (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These 3 images

Dear Lymantria,

I uploaded 3 images and the last 2 of the Russula rosacea images didn't exist before. Can you please review them...one last time.

Thank You and Goodnight from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 12:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help on these 3 images and on creating a category

Dear Lymantria,

Can you help first mark these images?


Secondly, do you know how to create a category on Commons for Acarospora thelococcoides? I just typed in a blank category for it in the first 2 photos. Finally, if possible please put the first and top rated Acarospora thelococcoides image in use on wikipedia. There is already an existing English wikipedia and Swedish wikipedia article for it...and this photo is rated one of the top rated photos of Mushroom Observer. BUT, there was NO image of this Lichen on Commons. The third image of a Xylaria is also a top rated image but Commons has no category on it and MycoBank calls its name Illegitimate but there is a youtube video on it. One or Two images is better than no image. Perhaps there is no need to create a special category for the third and fourth image as it is under Xylaria. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Leoboudv, Creating a species category if a genus category exists can be done quite basicly by just creating a category Category:Acarospora thelococcoides, with as content [[Category:Acarospora|thelococcoides]]. I created it for you and added a taxonavigation template, but the basic simple category will do. Concerning Xylaria tentaculata and Mycobank, I saw no problem here. The species does not have a wikipedia page, I created an item at Wikidata. Lymantria (talk) 06:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You Lymantria. I am not a taxidermist by nature so I did not want to create a category. Since there were no images of these species wikicommons, I decided to upload them here. It is good to know the species is legitimate. PS: If you can help, please review these 3 final images. I have no more....I can promise you this.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Your final uploads from MO ..... I'll wait and see . Lymantria (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramio gone

Panoramio is now discontinued. But these failed images still remain. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I have taken care of most of the possilby unfree Panoramio images as well. Lymantria (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You for marking that mushroom image whose species Commons has no picture of. Before I sign out, I uploaded 2 images for a wikipedia article...but I never use unapproved images. Please mark them if you can and use one of them for its wikipedia article. Thanks for everything.
  • File:Astraeus morganii 760961.jpg
  • File:Astraeus morganii 760118.jpg

Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thank you. --Lymantria (talk) 08:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 Final images

Dear Admin Lymantria,

I decided to do a quick final check of Common's images and noticed that there were No Lecanora subpallens and No Lecanora rubicunda images while the Lecanora albella images were all low resolution photos. So, I uploaded some images for these species here plus 2 extra ones for 2 other species. I hope you won't mind marking them. I had to create a few new categories for some missing Lecanora species.

Kind Regards...and this time it is final. Please mark the 8 images. I intend to spend February on something else than mushrooms or lichens. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:HTU hersentumor MRI.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

I don't know if this image is free or not. I can't see a license but I can't read Dutch. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see permission either. Lymantria (talk) 10:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These 5 images for Boletus pinetorum

Dear Lymantria,

I uploaded these 5 images only beacuse there is a wikipedia article for Boletus pinetorum...but no image on Commons on it. Could you review the images and consider using any image for its wikipedia article--which is linked in the files?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These 5 images

Dear Lymantria,

Can you mark these images of several mushroom species that Commons also does not have please?

File:Shepard grave.jpg

Do you know the right license for an open source image? If you do, feel free to mark this image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the licensing. Would you mind to be the second pair of eyes checking if it's correct this way and mark the image if it is? Lymantria (talk) 08:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 images

Dear Lymantria,

Could you find the time to mark these 8 images below?

I will do my best to mark your images when I have the time too. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Of course. And I am well aware that you have marked hundreds of my uploads. Thank you. Lymantria (talk) 06:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your help. At MO, the default license is CC BY SA 3.0 (see Pt #3 under 'Concepts Glossary' on 'License'), but the professional photographers now use CC BY NC SA 3.0. In contrast, in flickr the default license is always ARR...and some users there don't even know how to change a license without help from me. So, its very hard to get any images licensed freely sometimes. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • So be it. I can understand the professional photographers, who have to make a living and don't like to see their images used by others to make money. We can't complain having so many free images here on commons. Lymantria (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 Images

Dear Admin Lymantria, Can you mark these 8 separate images below please?

Commons also don't have these Inoybe mushroom species.

PS: Your point above on the licensing of professional photographers is well taken. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are marked. Lymantria (talk) 09:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final Inoycbe images

Dear Admin Lymantria,

I have searched through all the Inocybe mushroom categories on Commons and found thse last remaining free images. Can you possibly mark them one final time. This are the last ones from MO.

I will stop with MO after today. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images

Dear Lymantria,

If you have some time, please kindly review these 5 images. Commons also does not have this species of mushrooms.

Thank you for your help, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:09, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images

Dear Lymanrria,

If you have time, please kindly review these images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernst Hirsch Ballin (2013).jpg & File:Frank Westerman (2012).jpg

Dear Admin Lymantria,

If you know the license of these Dutch images, please feel free to review them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerard van Maasakkers (2012).jpg & File:Seth Gaaikema (2012).jpg

Dear Lymantria,

Do you know the license for these 2 Dutch image? I am lost. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Lymantria. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2018 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boloria bellona1.jpg

File:Boloria bellona1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kaldari (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Argyrostrotis sylvarum01.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Argyrostrotis sylvarum01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Leoboudv, Please check, I have corrected the source link. Lymantria (talk) 20:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Separatieminima overschreden, Airbus A320, 9 maart 2012.pdf

Dear Lymnatria,

If you know if this image is free, please feel free to review it. It in in Dutch. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find it. Lymantria (talk) 10:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hlwm logo.svg

Do you feel comfortable revieving this image Lymantria. All I know is the text is cc by sa 3.0. But this is a logo. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done An .svg can IMHO be considered "code". Lymantria (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside, do you have any idea what the license is for these 2 images below:

I think this needs some template of its own. I do not have time now to dive into it. Perhaps you could drop how to deal with this license at the village pump. Lymantria (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feleknas Uca.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

Do you know how to review this image? The license may need to be changed so I am not certain how to review it.

The German permission text says: "Alle hier bereitgestellten Materialien können frei verwendet werden, eine ausdrückliche Genehmigung der Linkspartei ist nicht erforderlich. Um Quellenangabe wird gebeten." OR "All materials provided here may be used freely, express permission from the Left Party is not required. To indicate the source is requested."

I don't know what license this means. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say {{Attribution}}. --Lymantria (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adaptations of the Pleistocene island canid Cynotherium sardous (2006) Fig. 1.png

Dear Lymantria,

If you are comfortable reviewing this image from a Dutch web site, feel free to do so. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Volledige vierhoek

Hello Lymantria,

Your image of the complete rectangle was used at w:Ternary operation on 30 June. At that time a point was labelled G which is now Q. Since the file is from 2007 and history show little activity, the alteration was a surprise. Would you please review the diagram as it may differ from what was originally posted. Rgdboer (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In my turn, I am surprised that the point was ever labelled G, which it shouldn't. Lymantria (talk) 07:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a useful configuration. My eyes failed me. Q it is. Am reassured now that Wikimedia Commons is stable. Rgdboer (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found

Hello, I'm sorry about those two invalid images uploaded by me. I thought Noncommercial images were also allowed here. Now I understand how it works! Thank you very much! gabibb2 ✉ 22:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Lymantria (talk) 05:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion
★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★

The file File:ID15342 - Sansebie - Eucera longicornis - ♂ - Åkerhumle (lys) - Bombus pascuorum.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:ID15342 - Sansebie - Eucera longicornis - ♂ - Åkerhumle (lys) - Bombus pascuorum.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:ID15342 - Sansebie - Eucera longicornis - ♂ - Åkerhumle (lys) - Bombus pascuorum.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3 images

Dear Lymantria,

If you can, please review these 2 images.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4 images uploaded by me

Dear Admin Lymantria,

If you can, please kindly review these 4 images.

Thanks for all your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thanks for the nice uploads. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your 4 Bold images

I don't see any photos at the source given for these 4 Bold images that you uploaded.

But I saw the images at the sources for File:Lithophane pertorrida 01.jpg and File:Lithophane pertorrida 06.jpg though. Maybe Bold is having a temporary issue but if so I would not have been able to see 1 and 6 too. The link source for 2, 3, 4 and 5 says 'Specimen Images: N/A' Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Leoboudv, This is due to a copy-paste error at my side. Thank you for noticing and I have corrected the links. Lymantria (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Annaphila diva 01.jpg

This image has a wrong source. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. Lymantria (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Dr

Thanks for your reply on the DR Lymantria. Fortunately it was resolved and the images are free. TechCrunch hired the photographer for their flickr images as Getty has no flickr account. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luckily it is :). Lymantria (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hackelia amethystina.jpg

This image from calphotos is not free, I think. I wonder if there are any others which are unfree on Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I started a DR on this one. Perhaps I could have deleted it as copyvio right away. But there is no hurry IMHO. Yes, there may be more of them. I marked one, many have an OTRS-ticket, and will perhaps dive into the other ones later. Lymantria (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This DR

Dear Admin Lymantria,

Can you 1. close this DR as keep and 2. deal with my request about one image I made in it in your position as an Admin. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You and Goodnight to you, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Dear Admin Lymantria,

As an Admin, could you please REPLACE all uses of this image under DR File:Calyptella longipes 29718.jpg that never passed review by Noah Siegel (who deleted the image) with this image below that I persuaded the flickr license owner to change the license freely:

Please help Lymantria. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vacation

Dear Lymantria,

I will be on a short vacation from this Wednesday until Sunday visiting my aunt. I may have access to a computer--or not. I don't know. If you need help, please ask Christian Ferrer to review your images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No source images

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lacinipolia stricta 02.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

This is an unfree image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, overlooked that (there are more of them among the collection). Too bad. Thank you for noticing. Lymantria (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not good that I review all his images. Better to have a single reviewer...on occasion. Take care in Europe. Best, Fabian --Leoboudv (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teloschistes chrysophthalmus (L.) Th. Fr 1165920.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

Please review this image when you can. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 20:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marasmius tageticolor Berk 1171957.jpg

Dear Lymantria,

Please review this image when you can. The source on MO is this image but when I use the MO tool, I get an error. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another reviewer also?

Dear Lymantria,

Please feel free to ask another reviewer to review your some of uploads such as Christian Ferrer. My father and I have been sick the past few days and I cannot review 60+ images you uploaded. Its too much for me. I had to take my father to hospital recently and he is 70+ years. He had an injured hand and was in a lot of pain. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fabian, That's sad news about your father. Please take good care of him. Don't worry if you will not have opportunity to review all my uploads. Indeed I do upload more these days than I do usually. Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Thank You Lymantria. With covid-19, I cannot get regular blood work tests done right now in Canada though I am likely normal as all my previous doctor's ordered blood tests every year come out normal. Canada is in better shape than the US in controlling the c-19 virus. I think that Christian Ferrer and I have now reviewed your uploaded images. As for my father, he was lucky, with c-19, the ER was not busy on Sunday at our local hospital. And he does not need an operation, only Tylenol. If it was in normal times, he would wait 6-7 hours to see a doctor at ER on a Sunday. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: The Washington Post is giving free coverage for all COVID related articles on their website and according to this link, more than 200,000 people died today (Saturday) of this virus sadly. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The national health institute gives daily updates here. Numbers are difficult to interpret. There are in our country probably a lot more COVID deaths than the numbers state. So even 200,000 may be a lot less than in reality. Difficult times. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes indeed. The UK total death list only include those who died in hospitals of c-19 and not in senior care home facilities. In Canada, many of the victims are seniors in care homes...but they are listed as c-19 victims. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heoclisis-ramosa-antlion-lacewing-dorsal-view-holotype-registration-no-t-20543-347767-large.jpg & File:Heoclisis-ramosa-antlion-lacewing-ventral-view-holotype-registration-no-t-20543-347769-large.jpg

No source. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed those. Thank you for noticing. Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caripeta aequaliaria2.jpg

No source again. Sorry, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sloppy me! I fixed it again. Thank you! Lymantria (talk) 06:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

I don't know this person but if you know him...or her, feel free to vote for or against this RfA. I have no time for Adminship myself. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Actebia fennica 01.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Actebia fennica 01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Thanks for noticing. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License review

Hi, would you kindly review the license of this image:

Thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -- Lymantria (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mycena lazulina 1188977.jpg

Please review this single image when you can Lymantria. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 05:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bromeliad Mosquito (Wyeomyia mitchellii)

Hi Lymantria, I was going to use the image at File:Wyeomyia mitchellii.jpg, but I am not sure if it is correctly labeled. The file description says it is Limatus durhamii, which is a different species and not listed anywhere else as a synonym for Wyeomyia mitchellii. When comparing the original image that the file links to on BOLDSYSTEMS, the image is not the same as the one on the BOLDSYSTEMS taxon page, although the taxon page image may have since been updated after it was first used on the Wikipedia Commons file information page. Nor does the image appear to be the same one as any used on the BOLDSYSTEMS entry for Limatus durhamii either. Can you confirm the identification and origin of this image? 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The description must mistake have been a copy-paste problem. I'm not sure why the image disappeared from BOLD Systems, but here you can see that it originally was shown there. Lymantria (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I'll use the image, but hopefully it wasn't removed from the BOLD Systems website because it was later discovered to be misidentified. Loopy30 (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lymantria/Archive_9&oldid=435904728"