User talk:Lulu989

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lulu989!

viciously Blocked / edit help edit >>

[edit]

Tryphon 21:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "No reason given"
Decline reason: "You did not provide us with a reason. Tiptoety talk 07:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

  • You have some nerve blocking this user and calling her my sock without proof, this constitutes some civility policy violation I am sure. And you are pretty quick to lie about her edits, a straight vote is not a disruption. GabrielVelasquez (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Why should I be blocked? I am just a user. I am not a sockpoppet, that is very insulting, my votes were not intended to be disruptive, the date does not show that the voting was closed on that pictureLulu989 (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC).))[reply]

Systematically voting in deletion requests all made by the same user, without even taking the time to read them (how else do you not notice that this one was closed and the image deleted), is disruptive. And maybe you're not a sockpuppet, but but creating an account just to back up your friend is just as disruptive. So I'm not lifting your 1 day block. If you really feel I'm being unfair, you can ask another admin to look into it. –Tryphon 23:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]