User talk:Lukas 91

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lukas 91!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stadtzentrum Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 06:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wohnüberbauungen Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 07:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blick vom Allenbergweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:15D:C6FE:95F2:F461 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blick vom Allenbergweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rathausstrasse Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stadt Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stadtzentrum Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wohnüberbauungen Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rathausstrasse Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blick vom Allenbergweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blick vom Allenbergweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stadt Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stadtzentrum Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blick vom Allenbergweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schlechte Qualität des Bildes Lukas 91 (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

You have proposed for deletion several files that had been reviewed many times and kept at Commons. They will not be deleted, stop this senseless activity abusing Commons procedures unless you want to be blocked. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadt Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archo08 (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtzentrum Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wikiimx (talk) 10:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtzentrum Weinfelden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:10F2:608D:D398:AF9E 13:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]