User talk:LukaE
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Presskonf.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Presskonf.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Presskonf.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 10:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Zarubino.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zarubino.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Zarubino.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 10:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Baptizo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Considering http://baptisti-vl.livejournal.com/6222.html (2009, "baptisti_vl") = http://pics.livejournal.com/baptisti_vl/pic/000173as.jpg (identical exif). Gunnex (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Smirnov2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Considering http://baptist.org.ru/news/broadcast/3067/ (2011, © 2007, Российский Союз ЕХБ. Разработано в GEHARD) = http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5309/51418765.3/0_645cc_dd5961c5_L.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Poysti nj.jpeg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Poysti nj.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Gunnex (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Poysti nj.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 10:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Doulos1.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Doulos1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
moogsi (blah) 03:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vsekhb222222222.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vsekhb222222222.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File:Sud Baptist.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Alex Spade (talk) 11:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
А также проблемы обнаружены у:
- File:Vladivostok Baptist Church, Russia - persecution.jpg
- File:Pavel Skvortsov presbiter Vladivostok Baptist Church in 1930.jpg
- File:Pastor Martynenko.jpg
Alex Spade (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Перенесено из User talk:Alex Spade
Здравствуйте. Я по поводу трех файлов, правомерность выкладывания которых поставлена вами под сомнение.
- File:Vladivostok Baptist Church, Russia - persecution.jpg
- File:Pavel Skvortsov presbiter Vladivostok Baptist Church in 1930.jpg
- File:Pastor Martynenko.jpg
К сожалению я не владею английским и плохо ориентируюсь на Викискладе и ранее по этой причине уже были удалены несколько файлов которые я, как автор, выкладывал там. Почему бы не вести переписку по-русски?
Но ближе к файлам. Я являюсь автором всех трех. Фотография File:Vladivostok Baptist Church, Russia - persecution.jpg была сделана лично мной в 1965 году.
Два других изображения - вырезаны мной из групповой фотографии конца 1920-х и глубоко обратоны графическими программами. То есть изменение достаточно серьезные, чтобы считать их отдельными от начального изображения. С уважением --Andrey dementev (talk) 12:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Вырезание и обработка (ретушь) не дают вам авторских прав независимых от оригинала. Вам нужно привести источник оригинала и показать его свободность. Alex Spade (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Извините, я думал, что дает. Я могу предъявить оригинальный источник (групповую фотографию, откуда они вырезаны). Ее автор неизвестен, но она относится к общественному достоянию, поскольку сделана в 1920-х (самое позднее в 1930 году, поскольку с 1930 года некоторые из изображенных на ней верующих уже стали жертвами сталинских репрессий) и эта фотография из общественного архива Центральной Церкви ЕХБ г. Владивостока.--Andrey dementev (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ок. Доподправил за вами. Alex Spade (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Спасибо --80.83.239.115 02:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ок. Доподправил за вами. Alex Spade (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Извините, я думал, что дает. Я могу предъявить оригинальный источник (групповую фотографию, откуда они вырезаны). Ее автор неизвестен, но она относится к общественному достоянию, поскольку сделана в 1920-х (самое позднее в 1930 году, поскольку с 1930 года некоторые из изображенных на ней верующих уже стали жертвами сталинских репрессий) и эта фотография из общественного архива Центральной Церкви ЕХБ г. Владивостока.--Andrey dementev (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Спасибо за то, что Вы загрузили в Викисклад (Wikimedia Commons) изображение File:Vladivostok-lagpunkt.jpg. Публикация этого фотодокумента дала новый импульс в изучении истории Приморского края и осмыслении зловещих страниц недавнего прошлого и их эха в настоящее время. Однако в описание изображения вкралось досадное упущение: кроме того, что это "панорама транзитного лагеря", в описании архивного снимка первой строкой указано "строительство № 213" (у Вас эта информация отсутствует). Строительство № 213, как известно, находилось в бухте Находка, а вовсе не во Владивостоке. О том, что силуэт сопок и наличие речки неиллюзорно свидетельствуют о местонахождении транзитного лагеря, запечатлённого на снимке, в районе озера Соленое (Болото) — Бархатная города Находка Приморского края, можно ознакомиться в ЖЖ. Помимо этого, по непонятной причине архивный снимок был загружен на Викисклад в отзеркаленном виде. Таким образом, неполное описание опубликованного снимка лагеря вкупе с его необоснованной подачей в зеркальном отображении способствовали грандиозной путанице на многих страницах Сети, где этой фотографией иллюстрируются как Владивостокский ИТЛ, так и Владивостокский пересыльный лагерь (причём как в оригинальном, так и в зеркальном виде). И ко всему прочему, Госархив Приморского края не может однозначно определить приналежность снимка лагеря к общественному достоянию на территории РФ, так как автор и время создания фотодокумента неизвестны. То есть снимок был загружен на Викисклад с недостоверной информацией в отношении копирайта. В связи с открывшимися обстоятельствами думается, что загруженный Вами на Викисклад с множественными нарушениями File:Vladivostok-lagpunkt.jpg необходимо удалить.--Gaggy Dun (talk) 13:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте. А откуда у Вас эта информация: "Однако в описание изображения вкралось досадное упущение: кроме того, что это "панорама транзитного лагеря", в описании архивного снимка первой строкой указано "строительство № 213" (у Вас эта информация отсутствует)."
- И вот это утверждение тоже странное: "И ко всему прочему, Госархив Приморского края не может однозначно определить приналежность снимка лагеря к общественному достоянию на территории РФ"... Любой снимок неизвестного автора, опубликованный законным путем более 70 лет назад в РФ становится общественным достоянием. В описании данного снимка в архиве значится, что это репродуккция 1940 года. Автор действительно неизвестен. Таким образом данный снимок является общественным достоянием согласно лицензии
This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. | |
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
Andrey dementev (talk) 22:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
--- Эта информация получена мною при работе с фотодокументом в Госархиве Приморского края и из полученного мною официального разрешения архива на публикацию фотоснимка транзитного лагеря в сети Интернет.--Gaggy Dun (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Странно что информацию мы получили в одном архиве, но она разная.--Andrey dementev (talk) 01:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Такое случается довольно часто, человек порой не желает замечать очевидные вещи, или же меняет своё мнение под давлением общественного. К примеру, 03/01/2013 в Живом Журнале был опубликован пост о том, что пользователь baptisti_vl поделился фотографией исправительно-трудового лагеря, который в сталинские времена располагался на Второй Речке. В этом посте фото лагеря представлено в оригинальном виде без отзеркаливания. По результатам обсуждения поста был вынесен вердикт о необходимости отзеркалить изображение. И вот уже 23/02/2013 участник Викимедии Andrey dementev (публикующий в Википедии множество материалов о баптизме во Владивостоке и не только) загружает в Викисклад File:Vladivostok-lagpunkt.jpg, где панорама лагеря представлена в зеркальном отображении. Думаете это случайное совпадение?--Gaggy Dun (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- А почему Вас в обсуждении называют "ТС"? Это Ваш старый псевдоним в ЖЖ-сообществе "Владивосток"? Вроде бы был там такой воинствующий безбожник...--Andrey dementev (talk) 09:41, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Такое случается довольно часто, человек порой не желает замечать очевидные вещи, или же меняет своё мнение под давлением общественного. К примеру, 03/01/2013 в Живом Журнале был опубликован пост о том, что пользователь baptisti_vl поделился фотографией исправительно-трудового лагеря, который в сталинские времена располагался на Второй Речке. В этом посте фото лагеря представлено в оригинальном виде без отзеркаливания. По результатам обсуждения поста был вынесен вердикт о необходимости отзеркалить изображение. И вот уже 23/02/2013 участник Викимедии Andrey dementev (публикующий в Википедии множество материалов о баптизме во Владивостоке и не только) загружает в Викисклад File:Vladivostok-lagpunkt.jpg, где панорама лагеря представлена в зеркальном отображении. Думаете это случайное совпадение?--Gaggy Dun (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Начинаете переходить на личности? Вам для общего развития: в этих наших интернетах ТС = topic starter, то есть человек, создавший новую тему на форуме.--Gaggy Dun (talk) 10:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Vladivostok-lagpunkt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gaggy Dun (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Baptist1925 01.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Baptist1925 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 21:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pavlov P V.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pavlov P V.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 21:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Visotski-magadan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A.Savin 12:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
File:First magadan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A.Savin 12:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Goretoy.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Goretoy.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Goretoy.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alex Spade (talk) 07:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Kidds-penecossstal.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Alex Spade (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Kidds-penecossstal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Карикатура Сектант - кулацкий петрушка.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sealle (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Правильно категоризируйте файлы
[edit]Здравствуйте, уважаемый LukaE. Пожалуйста, когда добавляете категории к заргужаемым файлам, убедитесь что они подходят. В файле File:Mamont-magadan.jpg Вы поставили категорию Category:Mamontenok, не посмотрев, что она относится к вездеходу, а не животному. Я поменял категорию на Category:Statues of mammoths in Russia. В следующий раз будьте внимательнее. С уважением, --Alekc2m (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
File:001kgbprop.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alex Spade (talk) 07:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Also - File:002kgbprop.JPG. Alex Spade (talk) 07:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Горные системы Корякского нагорья.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Горные системы Корякского нагорья.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Горные системы Корякского нагорья.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Alex Spade (talk) 21:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open!
[edit]Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.
С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.
С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")
Copyright status: File:Александр Васильевич Пашков.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Александр Васильевич Пашков.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Александр Васильевич Пашков.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:В. А. Пашков в изгнании.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:В. А. Пашков в изгнании.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:В. А. Пашков в изгнании.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)