User talk:Luk
Image deletion warning | Image:Tattiya_and_Air_Force_Amy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
AnonEMouse 14:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: Licenses
[edit]This was an isolated incident. The original author had used the PD-author license for the full-size image, and when I was transferring them over to Commons, I believe I used the previously uploaded full version as a template for the cropped version. I can't figure out why she would have used two different licenses, but it was just a minor oversight on my part, and is now fixed. -- Huntster T • @ • C 20:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Photograph.sept1895.jpg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Steamboat Hassalo running Cascades.jpg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Southafrica468bushman.jpg is uncategorized since 18 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Lew Soloff with the Manhattan Jazz Orchestra.jpg is uncategorized since 26 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Flavoured vodka bottles.jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
- Image:Oil Discoveries and Volume Per Decade.png is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
- Image:Telomere quadruplex without fog.jpg is uncategorized since 7 June 2009.
- Image:Pico Humboldt 2.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
- Image:RadhaKrishna artwork.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
- Image:Cuban missiles.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Bernard Kouchner.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--- Zil (d) 10:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Dnd_source_code.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
File:HaloVisualizationTechnique.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
85.179.162.138 06:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Dnd source code.jpg
[edit]I have just closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dnd source code.jpg as delete. You might want to have the enWiki version restored. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding User:Lucasbfr/CommonsImages_(Ok)
[edit]You have a bunch of images I have transfered from en wiki on that page, is there a problem with them as I have renamed them? (Off2riorob (talk) 22:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC))
Missing file.
[edit]Hi Luk, an editor is looking for this ... 2008botswana. ...JPG file that I think I renamed, did it go through your hands? I can't find it in my edit history. (Off2riorob (talk) 23:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)) I have found it so no problem.Regards (Off2riorob (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC))
Erreur sur File:Tram Paris T3 Plan.svg
[edit]Voilà, c'est corrigé ! Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup! Lucasbfr (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry bot, I can't help you. Lucasbfr (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Niloofar_beyzaie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
■ MMXX talk 19:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
File:PictureofGED.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Branding_irons-Dutch_K,_c,_and_k.jpeg
[edit]This photograph is the wrong way round ! Can you correct it? (it is used under this name !)--Alfred Löhr (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- It took me some time to get it! Weird choice indeed! But since it's already in use, I suggest you reupload it on the correct orientation. Lucasbfr (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Maria Julia Mantilla - Miss World 2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
File:SQLite Logo 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Michèle Gavras kidnapped in 1971.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Michèle Ray-Gavras - Octobre 2019.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Michèle Ray-Gavras - Octobre 2019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ben oui, on a besoin de la permission de Frank Ling. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Je viens de lever les yeux au ciel tellement fort que je me suis fait un mal de crâne. Luk (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove problem tags
[edit]
--Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Non mais c'est une blague j'espère ? Où est la caméra cachée ? En tant que coauteur de la photo, JE la rend disponible sous la license que JE souhaite. Merci de ne pas modifier les informations de licence que J'AI indiqué, sauf si tu as des informations qui indiquent que je ments sur la propriété du fichier.
- Je n'ai aucun problème à escalader cette dispute. Peu de choses m'insupportent plus que les personnes qui réfléchissent avec leurs macros et leurs templates. Par tes actes, tu fais du mal aux projets Wikimedia et à la communauté en général. Luk (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Vous n'êtes pas au dessus des règles (ou du moins vous n'avez fourni aucune information accréditant cette idée). La complainte "Par tes actes, tu fais du mal aux projets Wikimedia et à la communauté en général" est hélas une rengaine si souvent entendue de la part d'utilisateurs qui ne veulent pas se conformer aux usages de Commons qu'elle n'émeut plus guère les patrouilleurs. Par ailleurs, revendiquer un "travail personnel" après avoir dit que c'était le travail d'un ami n'incite pas à vous faire confiance. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Marrant, parce que j'ai d'abord dit que c'était mon travail, avant de changer pour ajouter mon ami. C'est pas grave, fais ton boulot de patrouilleur. Je ne suis pas au dessus des règles, c'est la communauté qui perd. Luk (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Vous n'êtes pas au dessus des règles (ou du moins vous n'avez fourni aucune information accréditant cette idée). La complainte "Par tes actes, tu fais du mal aux projets Wikimedia et à la communauté en général" est hélas une rengaine si souvent entendue de la part d'utilisateurs qui ne veulent pas se conformer aux usages de Commons qu'elle n'émeut plus guère les patrouilleurs. Par ailleurs, revendiquer un "travail personnel" après avoir dit que c'était le travail d'un ami n'incite pas à vous faire confiance. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Michèle Ray-Gavras - Octobre 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)