User talk:Lozano Manzanedo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lozano Manzanedo!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: File:La Merindad Estellesa.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La Merindad Estellesa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Borgoña Andres Firma 282165.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Castillo de Berlanga, planta.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Castillo de Berlanga, planta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brocar producción.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comentario sobre borrados

[edit]

Hola, Lozano Manzanedo. Se han restaurado por el momento todos estos archivos: clic. Eran los más "fáciles" (pues tenían el año en el nombre de archivo) aunque en el futuro intentaré pedir el desborrado del resto (de los que sean tapas de libros "jddamnte" antiguos) cuando tenga tiempo de irlo mirando. No puedo decir que el borrado fuera especialmente afortunado (pues era "muy evidente" que... estaban en dominio público), pero Commons funciona a veces regulín (pocos administradores, mucho trabajo acumulado por atender, poco tiempo para revisar la bondad de algunas peticiones de borrado, etc). En cualquier caso te llegó aviso de la deletion request ("petición de borrado") y no dijiste/alegaste nada: eso no facilita las cosas.

En cualquier caso, para evitar confusiones así en el futuro sería conveniente que en la 'infobox' de los archivos de este tipo en "|date=" aparezca la fecha del libro (sí, aunque salga en la descripción) en lugar de 2019, que en "|author=" no figure tu nombre (sino el del... autor del libro/página de título), que en "|source=" solo aparezca {{tl|own}} ("trabajo propio") si tú realizaste el escaneo. Si no, pon bien el sitio donde cogiste la imagen, bien los datos bibliográficos del libro. Y la licencia a usar en tu caso por lo general mejor {{PD-old-expired}} y no {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Si puedes agregar categorías a todos los archivos pues oye, genial también. Es decir, hacer algo parecido a esto en todos los archivos 'desborrados' (y los que pudieras subir en el futuro). El usuario @Discasto: ha ayudado corrigiendo ya la licencia de algunos archivos. Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones en Wikipedia/Commons/Friends. Strakhov (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias, Discasto, por rescatar esas imágenes que subí a Wikimedia Commons con más entusiasmo que rigor, evidentemente estaba convencido de que esas portadas de libros son de dominio público pero no supe registarlas como tales. Un error de neófito que se echó a la piscina sin saber nadar...
Efectivamente recibí un aluvión de Deletion Request que me dejó abrumado y no encontré el cauce para justificarme.
Tomo buena nota de tus instrucciones y espero hacer esta tarea en lo sucesivo con el método que me has enseñado.
De nuevo mil gracias por tu ayuda y diligencia. Me has hecho un gran favor.

--Lozano Manzanedo (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Lozano, pues... no sé si te has dado cuenta, pero cuando se borra algo en Commons hay un bot muy «amable» que desenlaza esos archivos en los artículos en Wikipedia. Si se habían borrado erróneamente, como en este caso, a veces hay un «amable humano» que se da cuenta del error, como en este caso Strakhov (no Discasto, quien solo arregló la especificación de la licencia), y entonces pregunta aquí, acuerda con otros usuarios restaurar las imágenes y finalmente las restaura en Commons. Pero lo que no existirá es ningún «bot amable» que los vuelva a enlazar en los artículos de Wikipedia, eso tendría que hacerlo otro «amable humano»: en este caso tú mismo . Te toca ahora terminar este trabajo allá y yo no te ayudaré por razones bien conocidas. Un abrazo Mar del Sur (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A cada uno lo suyo (Unusquisque suum que decía Triboniano) Releo estas líneas y veo que he omitido, sin querer, mi agradecimiento sincero y obligado a Strakhov por su decisiva ayuda. Así que reitero mi agradecimiento, que "de bien nacidos es ser agradecidos", como decimos por estos pagos.
--Lozano Manzanedo (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Casariego. Poemas encadenados.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Disco Expres ECK.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Album cover
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : CoffeeEngineer.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografia equivocada

[edit]

Hola Lozano La fotografia https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Tudela._Catedral.jpg pertenece a la puerta norte de la iglesia de la Magdalena, tambien en Tudela. Un saludo Un cordial saludo (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]