User talk:Llez/Archives/2015 (2)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphincterochila baetica, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Staphylaea staphylaea staphylaea 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Staphylaea staphylaea staphylaea 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polinices benoisti, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gibbula divaricata (Divaricate Gibbula), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibbula divaricata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gibbula cineraria (Grey Top Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obba moricandi moricandi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibbula cineraria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obba moricandi ssp. moricandi (Moricand's Obba), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusionella pseudofusus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:51, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pusionella pseudofusus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanculus corallinus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanculus corallinus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bankivia fasciata (Banded Kelp Snail), shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obba moricandi ssp. brunnescens (Brownish Moricand Obba), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Userkategorie

lb Llez, ist es eigentlich Absicht, dass du für deine Quality images keine User-Kategorie angelegt hast? Ich habe nur gesehen, dass du (auf deiner kaum noch aufrufbaren) Userseite die Eintragungen händisch gemacht hast.

Es würde für dich eine große Vereinfachung bedeuten, per Kategorie die Verwaltung deiner Bilder zu machen, damit wären alle auch per einem Mausclick aufrufbar. Da du bereits über 1000 davon hast, bedarf für den Start wohl einer einmaligen Arbeitssession, die aber überschaubar ist. Wenn du ev. Anleitung brauchst, dann sags einfach. Dasselbe gilt natürlich auch für FP und VP. Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 08:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obba moricandi brunnescens 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pleurotoma canaliculata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Userpage

Hi Llez! Thanks for all your beautiful uploads. I noticed that your userpage has a very big size (Pagesize: 157,761). Such big userpages are causing a lot of browsers to crash (induced modern browsers. It causes not only a big load on client side, but also on server's side. You ever considered moving the gallery's to user subpages? Best. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Habe auf meiner Talkpage geantwortet. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bankivia fasciata (Banded Kelp Snail), shell, striped form..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoa similis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba geminata 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba geminata, subfossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina dorbignyi, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebina tridentata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bolma persica 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bolma persica 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vexillum exasperatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum exasperatum (Roughened Mitre), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Brown-lipped snail (Cepaea nemoralis).jpg

changed id. Many thanks Charles (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanopsis jordanica, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angaria melanacantha 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angaria melanacantha (Imperial Delphinula), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful, very good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

butterflies VI candidates

Hi there. You've asked me to correct the scope of my submissions. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside, so I do not wish to make any changes. Charles (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinum bifasciatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinum bifasciatum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistolida kieneri ssp. depriesteri, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acer palmatum Dissectum Group (Japanese Maple), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumina decollata decollata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 22:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achillea clypeolata (Moonshine Yarrow), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. decollata (Decollate Snail), juvenile shell with protoconch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achillea clypeolata (Moonshine Yarrow), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melicerona listeri listeri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melicerona listeri ssp. listeri (Lister's Cowry), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achillea nobilis (Noble Yarrow), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aconitum carmichaelii var. wilsonii (Carmichael's Monkshood), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bostrycapulus aculeatus (Spiny Slipper Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aconitum carmichaelii var. wilsonii (Carmichael's Monkshood), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bostrycapulus aculeatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aconitum carmichaelii var. wilsonii (Carmichael's Monkshood), flower lateral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica fasciata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica fasciata (Solid Moon Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alchemilla hoppeana (Alpen Lady's Mantle), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alchemilla hoppeana (Alpen Lady's Mantle), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursus thibetanus (Asian black bear), threatening.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
They are not actually fighting, so scope needs to be changed Charles (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Changed from "fighting" to "treatening" --Llez (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumina decollata decollata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. decollata (Decollate Snail), adult shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium carinatum ssp. pulchellum (Keeled Garlic), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Setia scillae ssp. scillae, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium cepa var. proliferum (Tree Onion), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium cristophii (Persian Onion), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support--Isasza (talk) 14:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Setia amabilis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium cristophii (Persian Onion), fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support----Isasza (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium moly (Golden Garlic), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusillina philippi, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium moly (Golden Garlic), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (European mole cricket), frontal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alocasia macrorrhizos (Giant Taro), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heteropteryx dilatata egg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Considering the fact, that the object is only 9 mm in length, it is worth to be supported. However, I noticed, that sharpness in full resolution is problematic. --Cccefalon 13:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. decollata (Decollate Snail), juvenile shell with protoconch, fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semecarpus anacardium (Oriental Anacardium), dried fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius semistriatus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jean11 (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lobaria pulmonaria (Tree lungwort), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heteropteryx dilatata (Malayan jungle nymph), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamamelis virginiana (Witch Hazel), flower and fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclope neritea, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amaranthus hybridus (Smooth Amaranth), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amaranthus hybridus (Smooth Amaranth), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tritia neritea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius corniculum (Horn Nassa), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epipactis helleborine (Broad-leaved Helleborine), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ranunculus glacialis (Glacier Crowfoot), blooming out, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info When bloomimg out, the colour of the flowers changes from white to red.
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. decollata (Decollate Snail), adult shell, fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saxifraga muscoides (Mossy Rockfoil), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dorsanum plicatum, smooth form, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saxifraga muscoides (Mossy Rockfoil), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsanum plicatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with more sharpness. --XRay 17:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumina decollata decollata 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saxifraga exarata (Musky saxifrage), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoa splendida, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pedicularis kerneri (Kerner’s Lousewort), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Martin Grimmelshofen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pedicularis kerneri (Kerner’s Lousewort), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius fissilabris, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phyteuma hemisphaericum (Hemispherical Rampion), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carduus defloratus (Alpine Thistle), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arnica chamissonis (Chamisso Arnica), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumina decollata maxima 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Martin Grimmelshofen - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Martin Grimmelshofen - Sanctuary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassarius fissilabris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Martin Grimmelshofen - St. Joseph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Martin Grimmelshofen - St. Mary .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church St. Martin, Stühlingen-Grimmelshofen, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support For me best of two images of this church in this scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. maxima (Decollate Snail), adult shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arnica chamissonis (Chamisso Arnica), Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altars by Johann Christoph Feinlein, St. Martin, Stühlingen-Grimmelshofen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Excellent, niece piece, identified, geocoded and in use. All criteria met.--Jebulon (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania lineata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lysimachia foemina (Poorman's Weatherglass), Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaurea pseudophrygia (Wig Knapweed), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buchberg - Randen - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church St. Martin, Stühlingen-Grimmelshofen, sanctuary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose I think only the altar is remarkable here and deserves a scope. As we have an excellent candidate for it, I think it is enough.--Jebulon (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, we have already the altar. But here we see it in the context, which is, in my opinion, very interesting. Normally one would expect an baroque interior, but here we have a baroque altar in a very modern surrounding (even if the church is old). It shows also the interior of the church, which is very small, the photo was taken from the organ loft. --Llez (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius incrassatus (Thick Lipped Dog Whelk), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaurea scabiosa (Greater Knapweed), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysanthemum weyrichii (Dwarf Chrysanthemum), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neudingen - burial church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 16:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania lactea, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cirsium eriophorum (Woolly thistle), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumina saharica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cirsium eriophorum (Woolly thistle), Inflorescences.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfach - Stadtapotheke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrast too much. The sky at the verge to posterize in the right part. Nice motif that should be re-processed. What happened to the exif? --Cccefalon 09:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)  Done Completetly reworked from raw-file and exif added --Llez 10:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Contrast and colours are considerably better. However, still three processing errors, see my notes. --Cccefalon 11:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)  Done --Llez 11:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Good quality now. --Cccefalon 12:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vogtsbauernhof Gutach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burial church of the Princely House of Fürstenberg, Neudingen, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumina saharica, Adult shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caltha palustris (Marsh Marigold), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthostachys strobilacea (Pine cone bromeliad), Infrutescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida - five-banded - complete.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, Gutach, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info The "Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof" (Black Forest Open Air Museum) comprises several farmhouses, one of them the Vogtsbauernhof, which gave the name to the Museum.
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania mamillata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caltha palustris (Marsh Marigold), Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caltha palustris var. alba (White Marsh Marigold), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hippenseppenhof, parlour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentI have taken the liberty of wiki-linking the text associated with the image. Martinvl (talk) 16:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, but i changed the link to "Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof", for the article deals with the whole museum with all the farmhouses and not only with the Vogtsbauernhof itself --Llez (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida - five-banded.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania cimex forma fusca, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caltha palustris var. alba (White Marsh Marigold), Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gentiana septemfida var. lagodechiana (Crested Gentian), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea scabiosa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but resolution just above minimum --Uoaei1 10:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania cimex forma fasciata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gentiana septemfida var. lagodechiana (Crested Gentian), Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haslach townhall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haslach townhall - Coat of arms Fürstenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hippenseppenhof, hearth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question No comments or annotations? --Llez (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful but not used. Perhaps, this image could be placed in an encyclopedia. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leontopodium kamtschaticum (Kamchatka Edelweiss), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hippenseppenhof, chapel, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudotachea splendida, Shell variability.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leontopodium kamtschaticum (Kamchatka Edelweiss), Inflorescences.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haslach im Kinzigtal, townhall, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haslach im Kinzigtal, townhall, Coat of arms of the House of Fürstenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida - variability.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania cimex forma lactea, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Linum flavum (Yellow Flax), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hippenseppenhof, bedroom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Linum flavum (Yellow Flax), Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 16:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina bruguieri, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlina vulgaris (Carline Thistle), infrutescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diodora cayenensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 21:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium eriophorum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments We are used to get XXL-size snail images from you, but now you offer this thumb size flower image? I am confused. The pink flower left looks overprocessed, perhaps you can resolve this in a higher resolution? --Cccefalon 20:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC) This photo dates from 2009 from my beginnings with another camera. It was an attempt but I think, it's better to withdraw. --Llez 21:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC) No need to withdraw. I didn't checked the camera. My apologies. For this 4 MPx camera in 2009 it is pretty good. --Cccefalon 07:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limonium arborescens (Tree Limonium), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, parlour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diodora cayenensis (Cayenne Keyhole Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onoclea sensibilis (Sensitive fern), fertile fronds, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tudorella sulcata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Schöne Arbeit! Wurden die Bilder freigestellt oder wie kriegst Du diesen schwarzen Hintergrund? --Elrond 20:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)  Info Ich fotografiere vor schwarzem (in einigen Fällen auch beigem oder grauem) Hintergrund und stelle dann zusätzlich noch frei (Photoshop Schnellauswahlwerkzeug mit anschließender manueller Korrektur) --Llez 20:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, bedroom of the last farmer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Question Seems to be the only one photo of this bedroom, may be the scope is too narrow? -- Der Regenbogenfisch (talk) 12:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't know why we have only a few picutures at all of this interesting and important museum. I'd wish, we had more. BTW we have a lot of scopes with only one image at disposition (e.g. photos of plant and animal species, shells and so on). I think, the actual number of available photos should not be a threshold for the importance of a scope --Llez (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry, probably I have not understood the VI completely... For me ist does not make sense to jugde about something if there are no alternatives? -- Der Regenbogenfisch (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onoclea sensibilis (Sensitive fern), sori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haslach - St. Arbogast.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tudorella sulcata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myriophyllum hippuroides (Western Water Milfoil), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haslach townhall.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haslach townhall.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good work and an interesting subject matter --Elrond 20:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhabdocolpus muricatum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora holosericea, Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitonium clathrus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Again a very good work --Elrond 18:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stenocarpus salignus (Scrub Beefwood), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mühlenkapelle, Haslach im Kinzigtal, exterior, view from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info For more information and history see [1].
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mühlenkapelle, Haslach im Kinzigtal, Main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info The altar is a work of Anton Joseph Schupp (1664 - 1729)
For more information about the chapel and the history see [2].
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium clathrus (Common Wentletrap), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ornithogalum caudatum (False Sea Onion), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, farmhand's room.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ornithogalum caudatum (False Sea Onion), Bulbs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium turtonis (European Ribbed Wentletrap), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ornithogalum caudatum (False Sea Onion), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitonium turtonis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Thanks. I love your pictures (How many years watching your photos?). This one is not the better of them IMO, but clear QI: Good quality--Lmbuga 19:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hotzenwaldhaus, fireside bench.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ornithogalum caudatum (False Sea Onion), Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geophorus romblonensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geophorus romblonensis (Romblon Carrier Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium vulgatum ssp. europaeum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peringia ulvae (Laver Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum sanguisuga forma granosa (Granose Bloodsucker Mitre), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vexillum sanguisuga f. granosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geophorus siquijorensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geophorus siquijorensis (Siquijor Carrier Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colus distinctus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colus distinctus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vexillum rugosum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum rugosum (Rugose Mitre), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crepidula goreensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. IMO a extreme difficult subject to capture. --Hubertl 10:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crepidula goreensis, Shell variability.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info This species obviously was "lost". For more information (and history) see image caption. --Llez (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudotachea splendida 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pleurotoma denticulata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportAlways fascinating. And good quality, of course.--Jebulon 18:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bithynia tentaculata (Mud Bithynia), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pleurotoma denticulata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support good. Charles (talk) 17:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hotzenwaldhaus, bedroom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithium vulgatum europaeum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Angaria melanacantha 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Angaria melanacantha 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita versicolor 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita versicolor (Four-toothed Nerite), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tricolia capensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pistacia lentiscus (Mastic), habitus at a natural stand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Don't understand the scope I'm afraid - may be the use of English. Charles (talk) 22:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment "Natural Habitus" is, perhaps, best.
•  Info I think you confuse "habitus" (how it looks like) and "habitat" (where it lives). "Natural habitat" would make sense, but not "Natural habitus". The scope refers to the fact, that the shape of a plant often can be different in nature and in a botanical garden. This picture shows, "how the plant looks like in nature", or with other words: "Habitus at a natural stand" (and not in a garden). Furthermore, the picture shows only an example for the "habitat" and not "the habitat", for the plant is widespread in the Mediterranean region. So "Habitat" or "Natural habitat" is not suited for scope here in my opinion. --Llez (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me, I am convinced. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Habitus is not an English word, I'm afraid. You could say 'growing in the wild'. Charles (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Sure but "habitus" is a word international in botany and mineralogy --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment ...and in general use in (also English) Wikipedia and Wikimedia descriptions and articles. In addition, for years we have "habitus" as scope in VIs of plants, it was always accepted. Why replace an international scientific term by an English one? In this case one could also renounce on the scientific latin names of species (for they are "only" scientific terms and not English) and only use the English name. And what then with species without English name...? Wikipedia has a scientific base and demand, why then renounce on scientific terms? --Llez (talk) 04:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

 Comment The Wikipedia article on habit indicates that the meaning of the specialist botanical term habitus is interchangeable with habit - which refers to form not habitat. Hence my oppose (now removed). So I hope you two know what you are talking about, because I don't. Could you please correct the Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, historical bedroom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pistacia lentiscus (Mastic), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tricolia capensis ssp. capensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Colònia de Sant Pere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, basketmaker workshop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erica multiflora (Mediterranean Heath), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de Capdepera - Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptiferussacia clausiliaeformis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very useful. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erica multiflora (Mediterranean Heath), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gemmula boreoturricula, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Schauinslandhaus, parlour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Punta de Capdepera, Mallorca, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Punta de Capdepera with it's lighthouse is the easternmost point of Malorca. It is the only picture of it at Commons, the others in the Category "Cap de Capdepera" show only neighbouring promontorys (photographed from Punta de Capdepera), [3] is south of Punta de Capdepera (from there this photo was taken), [4] is in the north.

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tricolia pullus ssp. pullus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Far de Capdepera - Mallorca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, QI now, but would be good if you reduce the chroma noise in the dark areas, it is visible --Poco a poco 19:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)  Done --Llez 21:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bittium reticulatum (Needle Whelk), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, shoemaker workshop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coves d’Artà, Reina de las columnas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canariella eutropis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Hotzenwaldhaus, hearth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coves d’Artà, El infierno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canariella eutropis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artà - View from Transfiguració del Senyor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. Very sharp and good DOF -- George Chernilevsky 19:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gemmula hanseata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwarzwälder Freilichtmuseum Vogtsbauernhof, Vogtsbauernhof, loom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coves d’Artà, El elefante.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crepidula goreensis - variability.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crepidula goreensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà - Interior.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coves d’Artà, El baldaquín.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia parroquial Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolichupis rubinicolor, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hylocereus undatus 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canariella jandiaensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canariella jandiaensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Technique

Hello H. Zell, and thanks for the thousands of amazing photographs you've uploaded on Commons. Among your work, I was wondering about how you were able to produce such quantities of shell plates. I am especially interested about the deep-etching technique you use. Do you have a special set-up allowing an easy cut-off of the background? Given the quality of your production, some tips about your "how-to" would certainly be inspiring. Best regards, Totodu74 (talk) 12:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for sharing this experience! Your explanations about the background color are particularly interesting, and I understand that for a magic deep-etch the solution is to... own Photoshop :') Greetings, Totodu74 (talk) 11:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clavatula concatenata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Capella de les Animes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cleotrivia brevissima, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà - Capella de Sant Josep.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Capella de Sant Antoni Abat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà - Capella de Santa Lucia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Propebela turricula, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Capella de Sant Josep.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà - Capella del Roser.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- George Chernilevsky 19:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obelus discogranulatus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice colors! --Hendric Stattmann 18:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)~

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Capella de Santa Lucia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drillia miocaenica, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pere - Petra - Pica baptismal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drillia miocaenica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very promising, looks great on black background. I see a distinct lack of sharpness, depth-of-field problem? I guess it's a nightmare to get the whole object sharp, maybe use focus stacking? --Hendric Stattmann 18:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC) It is not a question of stacking (the picture is stacked), it is more a question of the size of the object (only 1,6 cm) --Llez 19:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Capella del Roser.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lighthouse Punta de Capdepera - Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbula safiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca, Window above the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

For orientation see annotation here and here

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbula safiana (Safian Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Pere, Petra, Majorca, Baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info At this baptimal font Saint Junípero Serra was baptised, the founder of the first missions in California, among others San Francisco, San Diego, and Carmel.
 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanculus kraussii, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba clausoinflata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra - Mallorca - Mission San Diego de Alcala.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra - Mallorca - Mission San Carlos Borroeo de Carmelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Pere, Petra, Majorca, Junípero Serra memorial plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra - Mallorca - Mission San Gabriel Arcangel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba clausoinflata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trachelochetus romanus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trachelochetus romanus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikilinking Descriptions

Hi Llez,

In response to your questions:

• Firstly, I feel that many reviewers are not following the rules properly.
• Secondly, I have filled in a number of Wikilinks my self for other editors, but I also feel that they should learn for themselves.

Finally, may I congratulate you on a very good image and also a thorough description. Martinvl (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra - Mallorca - Missions de Sierra Gorda .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguració del Senyor - Artà - Figured window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful colors! Could you please fix the overcorrected perspective? Thanks! --Hendric Stattmann 18:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Done You're right. Correction done --Llez 19:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crepidula spec. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrgospira tampaensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pseudotachea splendida - variability.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pseudotachea splendida - variability.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ardisia wallichii, leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ardisia wallichii, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església de Sant Jaume, Alcúdia, Majorca, Main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose: Point 4.2 of Commons:Valued image criteria states that the description should contain "Links to Wikipedia (or elsewhere) should be included to assist with verification." Although the description of the image is thorough, it lacks these links. I have checked both the English and German articles so it might be appropriate to include a reference to some other guide to the church. Martinvl (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Done No problem, linked (4.2 says "should", not "must"!) --Llez (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Not done - the links should be in the image file - here, not the "Valued image candidates" file. Martinvl (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

• • Still, it is  Done! I don't know, what you mean, THE LINKS ARE AT THE DESCRIPTION PAGE. Please have a look on the page image file - here under "File usage on other wikis", this is the part just above the Metadata. In the valued image cadidate page there is only as reference a hint on the links existing on the description page!!! Why do you oppose against better judgement? Or do you oppose only to oppose? --Llez (talk) 15:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Additional  Comment I just checked some of your pictures, you submitted as VIC and which have been promoted, e.g. this, this, this, this and so on. None of them is linked to an article in wikipedia. Why do you not fullfill you own criteria in your own nominations? According to your statement above, they should never have been promoted, as they are not linked to any wikipedia article. --Llez (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment: @Llez: . We are clearly talking at cross-purposes. Let me look at this file, the first of the three that you mentioned. If you go to the field "Description", you will see three Wikilinks

• Old Scotney Castle
• National Trust and
• medieval.

In addiition you will see two other links (source code shown):

• "{{On Wikidata|Q17530343|this building}}" and
• "{{Listed building England|1085287}}".

I hope that this explanation clears up the confusion. Martinvl (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but "used in" means, that the picture is used in the article, not a link to an article on a term. And your pictures do not appear in articles, as it is meant by "Used in", but if you want, I can do so.  Done Now I know what you mean and I linked as you wanted, also in my other nomination and thanks for the hint. It is new for me. I nominate VIs for more than five years, and never it was was required by an reviewer. But what's with many other VIC on this page which are not linked in your sense. Why don't you oppose there? --Llez (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Now that the description is properly linked, I am happy to support this nomination. Martinvl (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rubia tinctorum (Common Madder), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església de Sant Jaume, Alcúdia, Majorca, Capella de Sant Josep.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pollentia - Ruins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església de Sant Jaume - Alcúdia - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa natal de Fray Junípero Serra, memorial plate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose: In my view a plaque showing the site of an event is only worthy of a VI status if no images exist of the site itself and the event is highly noteworthy. In this case the site itself exists - see here so this image is a far better image than the one nominated as a VI.Martinvl (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  You must sign your vote to confirm. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Done (NB, I over-rode the date on the signature with the date that it was posted) Martinvl (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment The scope is not the site, but the plate, that's a difference! --Llez (talk) 06:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Commemorative plaques are very important despite their austere and forbidding aspect. We are also there to promote this work of remembrance. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Archaeodontosaurus. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Moved to MVR Martinvl (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment: @Archaeodontosaurus: , @Medium69: , @Llez: Notifying interested parties. Martinvl (talk) 16:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
• These are not the same photos, not the same subjects, nor even the same scopes: there 's no reason not to discuss here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, best in scope - per Archaeodontosaurus the plaque not the place. DeFacto (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Archaeo. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba costillae, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bathytoma cataphracta ssp. jugleri, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Exemption geocoding for shot studio. Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image description lacks links to enable verification - suggested link to en:Bathytoma. Martinvl (talk) 08:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Dear Martinvl, can you please explain, how you verify this species by the link you suggested? Is there any descripion? NO! Is there any picture? NO! Bathytoma cataphracta jugleri isn't mentioned at all. For correct verification please read the publication of Philippi, 1817 with the description.
In general: You can't verify nothing, if you link a species to nothing more than the name of species. It says nothing about the correct identification (and that means verification!). I can link any species to the name of any other species, but what does it prove? Nothing! Only by studying descripitions you can verify the identitity of a species, not by a link to an arbitrary name. In addition: The species lists in wikipedia are not complete. Does it mean, that any species, that is not listed or decribed in WP doesn't exist? And what with species, where not only no discriptions exist in WP, but in the whole www? I come often across such cases. Shall I submit a copy of the journal with the original description of the species together with the nomination to verify the species? It is not possble, the scientific journals are copyrighted.
In addition: I remember you, what I wrote some days ago on your talk page: "I please you, in such a case, not to begin with a harsh "oppose", but to give a chance for improvement first, not by "oppose", but by "Comment" (see e.g. this example). Then one can discuss and improve in a fair way (perhaps also per discussion pages). I know, there are cases to oppose, but this are cases, when another picture is better or no improvement can be made. So I please you again, give a chance to improvement before a definite opposing." Now I know, this appeal was futil, your behaviour didn't change. --Llez (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lenz,

1. I know that "Oppose" might look harsh, but the alternative is that I write a comment, you do nothing as in view of Archaeodontosaurus' vote this passes as a VI. I can always revoke the "Oppose".

2. The link does not have to be to from Wikipedia. In this case, an alternative link is [this University of Rotterdam] link. However the Wikipedia link does tell me a bit about the family of shells. If the only citation is a learned journal, then that is good enough - all that I am asking is that you clarify where you got your information.

I trust that this clears things up. Martinvl (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

It often happens, that links outside wikipedia do not extist any more some time later. Then you have an empty link, what will you verify by it? So I tried to avoid it. You yourslf demonstrate here, that one can find pictures (not descriptions, which are much more useful) to compare within a short time (my comment at 18:04, your answer at with a comparable picture at 18.32). So is is clear, that everybody, who is intersted in, can find information immediately. Why also risk empty links? I can't control the actuality of thousands of links ervery week, if they are still OK. But nevertheless  Done, the link proposed by you is on the desription page now. You see, I don't "do nothing", I accept your suggestions, as in did in the past nominations. I hope, it's OK so. --Llez (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Llez: I have overhauled the description. Will you please check it to see that it makes sense. Martinvl (talk) 23:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks --Llez (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porta Principal, Alcúdia, Majorca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església de Sant Jaume, Alcúdia, Majorca, Capella de la nostra Senyora de la Muntanya Carmelo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 OpposeThe scope for this image does not meet the criteria in here. Specifically, the rules state "When appropriate, the building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope, ... Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest (for instance a remarkable crypt or sanctuary)". Although this church has sufficient architectural significance that it warrants a VI of the interior and one of the exterior, I cannot see anything that makes this chapel sufficiently noteworthy that it should have its own VI. Martinvl (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support It's true what the guidelines say, but I think that this scope is OK as it can be considered a work of art. Better by far than some of the VI nominations of inconsequential buildings of little historical, architectural or artistic merit that have been supported. Charles (talk) 08:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @Charlesjsharp: May I also draw to attention that the guidance for Works of art states "Not every work of art is worth a Valued Image scope. A scope is justified for instance if the work is the most significant work (or one of the most significant works) of an artist having an article on its own on any Wikipedia, or if it is a seminal work in some way". I could not find any article in Wikipedia about the artists concerned.

My understanding for the restrictions in VIs is to prevent people looking for suitable images to illustrate articles from being flooded with hundreds of images. Martinvl (talk) 12:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

 Question @ Martnvl: Why always opposing only my nominations (in the past few days [[5]], [[6]], and this one). On the other hand, we have "details of the interior" of other nominators at the same time (e.g. [[7]], [[8]], [[9]] and so on), which are obviously OK for you, for you didn't oppose. Can you please tell me resasons not to oppose in this cases but in mine??? What are the reasons that justify a scope on the one hand and do not justify in the other? And what's the difference between the scope of this nomination and this [10], which you obviously accept, or had you only forgotten to oppose??? --Llez (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Obviously important enough to justify an own scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bathytoma cataphracta jugleri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 18:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rubia tinctorum (Common Madder), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architectonica perspectiva 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectonica perspectiva (Clear Sundial), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phasianella modesta modesta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phasianella modesta ssp. modesta, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment @Llez: Should link to category. Is this a different species to Phasianella solida? - the Wikipedia article says they are synonyms. Charles (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I share the same concern that Charles --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, Wikimedia says, but it relies only on one source, [11].
    [12], on which I refer to (see also description page), accepts it as valid species, also [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. It's a pity, that Wikipedia (as often in shells) refers only to one source (WoRMS) and not considers other opinions. --Llez (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It certainly looks different. Perhaps best to cross reference. Charles (talk) 11:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done References in description page --Llez (talk) 15:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candidula ultima 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Holleday 22:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Candidula ultima, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithium costatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium costatum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Consistorial - Alcúdia - Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pupillaea aperta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pupillaea aperta (Double-edged Keyhole Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanculus puniceus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanculus puniceus (Purplish Clanculus), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Consistorial - Alcúdia - Window.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hieracium bupleuroides (Hare-ear Hawkweed), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obelus despreauxii, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serratocerithium tuberculosum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Serratocerithium tuberculosum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porta del Moll. Alcúdia, Majorca, view from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Clanculus puniceus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clanculus puniceus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hieracium bupleuroides (Hare-ear Hawkweed), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església Santa Margalida, Santa Margalida, Majorca, view from South-West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Setia antipolitana, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església Santa Margalida, Santa Margalida, Majorca, interior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina pachystoma, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba geminata fossil 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 01:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Església Santa Margalida, Santa Margalida, Majorca, Main altar..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba geminata, Fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puig de Ferrutx - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Stained glass windows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Vanoot59 15:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - St. Mary.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clavatula glaberrima ssp. praecedens, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The twelve stained glass windows of the Església Santa Margalida, Santa Margalida, Majorca..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Very good! --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support A lovely, clear image that satisfies the criteria. -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amblychilepas platyactis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock - Cap de Formentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amblychilepas platyactis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Stained glass windows.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Stained glass windows.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medusafissurella dubia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast at Mirador es Colomer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clavatula glaberrima praecedens 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 08:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medusafissurella dubia, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla sarcostoma 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arum pictum, Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock - Cala Barques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 10:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla sarcostoma, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemmula badensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gemmula badensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Joyeux Noel!

Hello Llez, I also wish you and your family a merry Christmas and all the best for 2016! --Poco² 10:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Margarites pupillus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caimari - Mallorca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

BONNES FETES

Thank you for your good wishes and wish you happy holidays to you and your family. I hope we can go on wikipedia to grow. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Margarites pupillus (Puppet Margarite), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassarius niveus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 02:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lluc -Statue of Pere Joan Campins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius niveus (Lattice Dogwhelk), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of Santuari de Lluc, Majorca, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canariella plutonia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Santuari de Lluc - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Pere Joan Campins i Barceló, Santuari de Lluc, Majorca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Rafaell Russell (talk) 04:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canariella plutonia, Fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rock - Cala Barques.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rock - Cala Barques.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemmula annae 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camino del Monte del Rosario - Lluc - Mallorca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puig de Ferrutx - Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puig de Ferrutx - Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)