User talk:Liconstan
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Flickr images
[edit]If you upload a flickr image, please give the exact flickr link to an image like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mercyforanimals/6556757385/in/set-72157628531396063/
Don't give a flickr link to a flickr set or the flickr bot will not pass the image....and it ends up in this Category. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Battery cage hen, Buckeye, rescued by Mercy for Animals in 2001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:A duck being "force-fed" through a tube to produce foie gras..jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A duck being "force-fed" through a tube to produce foie gras..jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 23:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Overcategorising
[edit]Dear Liconstan, thank you for your contributions. They have for the most part been very useful. However I'd like to point out that the categorisation system we use here at WM Commons is not a tag system but a hierarchial category tree system. This is to keep higher level, more general categories from being overcrowded with tons and tons of heterogenic material. The most important thing to keep in mind is to not add any categories that are (or should be) supercategories to others for the same picture/category. For an example, one of your edits: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gestation_crate_pig_showing_stereotype.JPG&diff=98123939&oldid=72741315
The image previously had Category:Gestation crates after which you added the following:
- Category: Factory farming
- Category: Pigs
- Category: Farms
- Category: Agriculture
- Category: Agribusiness
- Category: Agriculture with animals
- Category: Livestock
- Category: Domesticated animals
- Category: Agriculture by type
- Category: Veterinary science
- category: Veterinary medicine
- Category: Animal welfare
- Category: Human use of animals
I removed all of these, with the following logic:
- Domesticated animals, Livestock, Pigs, Agriculture with animals, Agriculture, Human use of animals -- Gestation crates is exclusive to pig farming, which is subcat to Pigs, which is subcat to Livestock etc. Pig farming is also subcat to agriculture with animals, which is a subcat to agriculture and human use of animals.
- Agriculture by type -- this is a metacat, i.e. is only supposed to hold other categories and no files. A sow in a gestation crate is not a type of agriculture, but a feature of factory farming, which in turn is a type of agriculture.
- Agribusiness, factory farming -- agribusiness is concerned with the business of food production. Gestation crate is a method of pig farming and not directly related to food production on a business level. It is also a subcat to factory farming, itself a subcat to agribusiness.
- Farms -- a gestation crate is not a farm
- Animal welfare -- gestation crates is already a subcat of controversial animal use, which is subcat to animal welfare
- Veterinary science -- I don't even understand why this was added
- Veterinary medicine -- very flimsy connection -- gestation crates may be unhealthy to sows, but that is not grounds to categorise it.
I hope this helps to grasp the logic behind our categorising system :) --Pitke (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)