User talk:Lhennen
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Northern-trust.svg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Northern-trust.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 05:34, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:AMBER Alert Luxembourg Active Website.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
4nn1l2 (talk) 02:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 16:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Luxembourg Learning Center bei Nacht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fritz-kola Kampagne Trink aus Glas.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Norbert Nicoll.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Norbert Nicoll.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Norbert Nicoll.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fritz bottles on white background.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Da das vor allem Deutschland betrifft, habe ich den LA mal auf dem Forum zur Diskussion gestellt. Es könnten also bald mehr Diskutanten hinzustossen. --Túrelio (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ich bin gespannt! ;) Wie gesagt: Hätte ich nur das Logo hochgeladen, wäre ich vollkommen mit dir einverstanden gewesen, dass die Gesichter mindestens diskutiert werden müssen. Aber auf meinem Bild (und prinzipiell bei solchen Darstellungen) sehe ich derartige, ... als Beiwerk.--Lhennen (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Die Firma zu kontaktieren ist eine gute Idee. Um die Erfolgsaussichten zu erhöhen, würde ich dir empfehlen, denen die Links der im LA aufgelisteten Flaschen-Fotos zu schicken und anzufragen, ob sie bereit wären, die freie Lizenz, unter die die jeweiligen Fotografen diese Bilder gestellt haben, als Inhaber der Rechte am Fritz-Kola-Logo (und ggf. auch gleich am Limo-Logo) zu bestätigen. Das fällt ihnen sicher leichter, als das Logo als solches freizugeben. Die Antwort sollten sie direkt an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (und dich natürlich) schicken. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo, ich habe Fritz-Kola schon eine Mail geschickt, die Bilder allesamt aufgelistet/verlinkt und dann auf das Online-Formular verwiesen (habe in der Mail auch die Dateiauflistung mit |-Trennern vorbereitet, so dass der/diejenige im Grund nur Kopieren & Einfügen muss). --Lhennen (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Die Firma zu kontaktieren ist eine gute Idee. Um die Erfolgsaussichten zu erhöhen, würde ich dir empfehlen, denen die Links der im LA aufgelisteten Flaschen-Fotos zu schicken und anzufragen, ob sie bereit wären, die freie Lizenz, unter die die jeweiligen Fotografen diese Bilder gestellt haben, als Inhaber der Rechte am Fritz-Kola-Logo (und ggf. auch gleich am Limo-Logo) zu bestätigen. Das fällt ihnen sicher leichter, als das Logo als solches freizugeben. Die Antwort sollten sie direkt an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (und dich natürlich) schicken. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Textile Rundschlinge Multifilament.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Textile Rundschlinge Multifilament.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Textile Rundschlinge Multifilament.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 13:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Querschnitt textile Rundschlinge.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Querschnitt textile Rundschlinge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Querschnitt textile Rundschlinge.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Defective Steelflex round sling.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Defective Steelflex round sling.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ryanair logo new.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kashmiri.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)