User talk:Leonard Gauthier
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Oliver Wight (1930-1983).gif
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oliver Wight (1930-1983).gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you!
- I will search for the original file and find the source and write it down. I used it in my thesis defense on the topic of Business Model Ontology and I did cut and change the original.
- Again, thank you for the advice. I am on it. Leonard Gauthier (talk) 06:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I added source and author... but for the author I wrote the CEO of the company that published the photo. This photo is no where to be found on the internet but on this site (that I wrote as source) and some Russian site I think.
- Could you tell me if doing it in this way is ok? Or should I completely change the photo with something already uploaded on Wikipedia? Oliver Wight doesn't have a photo on Wikipedia, but the rest have.
- File:Oliver Wight (1930-1983).gif - Wikimedia Commons Leonard Gauthier (talk) 08:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- You have to show that the photographs are "licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license" as you claim.
- If you just scanned these images in from books, they may still be under copyright. Please update the files to include as much information as you can about the book you took them from and/or the original photographer. Belbury (talk) 08:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Peter Bachvarov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Belbury (talk) 15:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have a personal contact with Peter Bachvarov and if needed I can get his personal approval in writing. I will ask today dnvnik.bg to allow to use the photo here but if they don't allow it I will change it. Is that ok or should I do something else?
- Thank you in advance for the heads up! Leonard Gauthier (talk) 06:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- It's the photographer that you'd need permission from, rather than the person depicted. Contacting dvknik.bg seems a good first step. Belbury (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Kirlian wine photographs
[edit]Are File:Kirlian effect on wine.jpg and File:Section-3-The-Method-background.webp taken from an academic paper or similar, or are they your own work? Belbury (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Those two are the work of a company who has patented and put into practice the technology of wine vitalization. I didn't write about the company or mention it, but if I write it as the source it would maybe connect the article with the company. I wasn't sure about that Leonard Gauthier (talk) 12:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- You need to say where you got the images from so that Commons can confirm that the images were released under a free licence.
- If this can't be confirmed on the public web but the company has given you permission to publish their work under a CC-BY licence, you need to confirm that through COM:VRT (eg. by having the company send an email to Commons). Belbury (talk) 12:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:William Deming.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:William Deming.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:William Deming.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Belbury (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- I sent an email to the Deming Institute to get a permission. I am waiting for a reply in the next 2-3 days. Leonard Gauthier (talk) 12:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- No problem, I've just put a standard template on the file saying it doesn't have permission - it means that anyone wanting to reuse the image will be aware of the potential issue, and if no permission has been given after 7 days the file will be automatically deleted.
- If it ends up taking longer than 7 days to get permission, though, that's okay, the act of confirming permission should restore the file (and if it doesn't, you can file a Commons:Undeletion request to put the image back up). Belbury (talk) 12:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Industrial Cognition Tree.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Jimfbleak (talk) 08:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:The Industrial Cross arrows.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Jimfbleak (talk) 08:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Operation in Real Time - hERP.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Jimfbleak (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Single and Set Management - hERP.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Jimfbleak (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Terminology of the BMO.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Jimfbleak (talk) 08:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Section-3-The-Method-background.webp
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Section-3-The-Method-background.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Section-3-The-Method-background.webp]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)