User talk:Legoktm
|
Picture of the ...
[edit]At Wikicon, Lego and I briefly talked about the possibility of a larger POTY-like event commemorating 20 years of Commons next year -- something which perhaps draws on a wider range of images than just FPs and/or which is limited to just contributions by Commons contributors. I mentioned the monthly photo challenge and quality images as two possible pools of photos that are both broader than FP and limited to user creations, but I'm sure there are other possibilities, too. Figured I'd ping a few people here who I think might be interested either because they enjoy thinking outside the box when it comes to FPC or because of their involvement with the monthly challenge. @W.carter, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, Ikan Kekek, Colin, and Jarekt: . — Rhododendrites talk | 14:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I think we should add "this year's photo challenge winners" to the list of choices for every POTY. They (Commons:Photo challenge#previous) really are a great set of photos. There would only be 72 entries, if we assume two challenges in a month and picking the 1st, 2nd and 3rd entries per the results template. The entries would be nicely varied and user generated. Some photo challenge entries will also be FPs, so they could be eliminated from that set.
- QI may be worthy but it doesn't generate "Wow!" images and so for that reason I don't think it is suitable for including in a popularity contest where "Wow!" is likely the main judging criteria. It would also be difficult to restrict the number judged. Many users nominate their images for QI and FP so there's already a way to select the best of QI: those are FPs. -- Colin (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not understanding why we shouldn't restrict this to FPs. The best of the Photo Challenge images should be nominated at FPC, as seems to be happening to at least some extent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm aware that Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odin and Thor, Ravens, Tower of London 2016-04-30a.jpg, which won Commons:Picture of the Year/2016, only just scraped through FPC, with technical complaints that wouldn't have been a factor at photo challenge and it seemed were not a concern at POTY. I see some PC images get FP but not sure it is so many of the best that it isn't worth considering further. -- Colin (talk) 11:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not understanding why we shouldn't restrict this to FPs. The best of the Photo Challenge images should be nominated at FPC, as seems to be happening to at least some extent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Rhododendrites for kicking off this thread and pinging folks! The 20th anniversary of Commons is Sept. 7, 2024 and I would like to be able to run some kind of "Best of Commons" photo contest that is more than just a "super POTY" (i.e. we shouldn't just be rehashing the same POTY contests). I would like to start the 2023 POTY in mid-January (more on that soon) so we then have time during the year to run this contest and announce the winner(s) before/on September.
- Some ideas so far: divide photos by geographic region, or by decade. Or best photo taken by a Commons user. Legoktm (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure our tagging of images is reliable enough to determine which FPs were taken by a Commons user without going through each one individually in person. Only some people apply personal categories. Geographic region would possibly overload certain areas such as USA or Germany.
- A different approach (either combined with a contest or not) could be to ask some people to nominate their favourite image on Commons (not their own) and explain why it is great. Or for photographers to nominate their favourite own image and explain why it is special to them. It would likely require a degree of editing and subjective selecting that isn't how we traditionally operate, but if people could accept that, it might generate an interesting work. -- Colin (talk) 11:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- I love this idea. Legoktm (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, Rhododendrites and Legoktm, for your initiative! It’s a great idea and in any case we should so something like this. We have already very good ideas in this discussion – I especially like Colin’s idea that people could nominate their favourite photos on Commons. The problem is, how do we select the people who can nominate here? – Just as a worst-case scenario: If we can’t find a good and easy to implement solution, I would suggest to make a “all-time POTY” round, like POTY, but just with the finalists (not only the winners!) of all POTY years. This would be rather boring, I know, but I hope it would be rather easy to implement this. Therefore I propose this just in case we cannot find a more thrilling, but still practicable solution. My 50 cent, --Aristeas (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, every Commons photo contest explicitly refuses restorations from consideration, and while they're technically included in POTY, there's absolutely no celebration of anything but the overall winners of POTY, not the winners of categories (where restorations are generally lumped with paintings downloaded from museums unchanged anyway, and the paintings inevitably win)...
- There has never been any attempt at Commons to celebrate diversity of work beyond photography, and (maybe like 10 years ago) illustration. So have another celebration of the photographers' club, but, if you do, don't act like it's the big celebration of everything Commons. It's not even attempting to get the diversity of photographs out there. It's heavily biased towards dramatic action shots that look good at thumbnail, the major exceptions being major news events (Pluto/New Horizons, burning of Notre Dame, COVID). Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Take care
[edit]Hi, I have just seen your message. Please take care of yourself before anything else. POTY can wait. Best, Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Automated reports
[edit]Hi Legoktm, I noticed your bot updates some reports on Wikipedia. I wonder if you could do the same for one or two reports here:
- Commons:Report_Special:UncategorizedCategories. It's based on Quarry:query/86077.
- The count by user is added when it's formatted.
- Possibly the lines could be in a template for easier formatting.
- There is a similar report at Commons:Report_UncategorizedCategories_with_infobox (quarry:query/85877). If it's easier, I could merge the two.
- When updating, after running the query, the resulting categories need to be purged and then the queries ran again. Otherwise we get false positives due to template based categorizations (notably {{Wikidata Infobox}}).
- Ideally, the reports are updated 6AM and 6PM UTC, so Europeans and Americans don't get too many entries that have already been dealt with.
The reports may appear short now, but not too long ago they were at 4000 categories total. I think this was partially due to Special:UncategorizedCategories having ran only once a month.
(I added it at Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Generate_a_daily_database_report_equivalent_of_Special:UncategorizedCategories as well.)
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Request to move File:44 AWB illustrations for AWB manual.png
[edit]Hey @Legoktm,
I have seen you have uploaded a file for the AWB user manual project. According to the guidelines at w:Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/User_manual_project#Naming_conventions, I think the file should have a 0 at the start. Though not something very detrimental, but that sometimes messed up the sorting and made it slightly harder for me to find the next image number. I would be very grateful if you could move it to a name with the zero, that is File:044 AWB illustrations for AWB manual.png.
Thanks for your time! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like it's already been taken care of. Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 02:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)