User talk:LastestAttempt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, LastestAttempt!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Please do not engage in edit warring like you did at File:Vaunthompsonia cristata.jpg. If this continues, I will request a block for you. --VKras (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello LastestAttempt, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Campylaspis rubicunda.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might then want to have a look at these: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bathyporeia/albums/72157634083834066 and compare them to the Commons' versions!. I thought I could upload lower resolution version of my own images under a wikicommons compatible licence. Correct me if I'm wrong. LastestAttempt (talk) 19:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the flickr files, and the Flickr account (a great and nice collection of photos IMO), and it is exactly why I deleted the files here. The images have been priorly published under an uncompatible license in Flickr, and in such case anyone can upload these images here and say they are theirs, however there is no evidences of your ownership. This is done to protect the rights of the copyright holder. You may be interested by reading this: "Can I apply a CC license to low-resolution....?". In summary that mean that 1/you can license any (or any resolution of the) things that you own under the CC licenses of your choices 2/ however your license here will allow anyone in possession of a bigger resolution to use it under the CC license (and as the images are available in high resolution, therefore you give indirecty the licenses for them too). The other issue, if you claim to be the author, is that a prior account (owned by the author of the flickr account) have been blocked here, and, soon or later, this will bring some issues for someone. Possible solutions: you manage to convince the Commons community to unblock the account; or you put directly in Flickr a compatible license for the files that you want to be upload here (see my previous comment about the licenses for specific resolutions); or a third solution can be that you publish in flickr (under free licences) low resolutions of unpublished images. Hope this help you. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. This helps indeed, but sadly for wikipedia, this will mean deleting a lot of images. I did not know about the different-resolution-same-licence rule. My hires images on my flickr account I want to keep -NC-ND-. I've uploaded a couple of thousand images under several accounts on Wikicommons since 2005! That means at least deleting all images of user:Z440Xeon and from user:Biopics (everything under 'self' since 21:11, 28 February 2011à. The ones from user:Lycaon predate my flickr account and can be kept. All those files are a subset on what can be found on my Flickr account. Maybe best thing is to nuke everything? I would be sorry for that but the system is a bit too rigid for me. Thanks for enlightening me. LastestAttempt (talk) 21:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid that it is not as so simple. Let me explain, my administrative action have been to speedy delete images that I found here by chance, a thing that I already did hundred and hundred of times. For images uploaded by an account blocked this is a bit different: if an administrator block an account because he have no doubts about who is the owner of that account, therefore that also means that he have no doubts about the ownership of the files, and therefore that the copyright violation is much more less evident, or even inexisting... Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think that if you use your flickr account to publish low resolution of unpublished images (even if they are just slightly different than the high resolutions, it is only necessary that the low resolution photos be not the sames than the ones in high resolutions, example 1 being different than 2), so then the images would be uploadable here by simple transfert, and you will keep control on the resolutions. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]