User talk:L'artauprésent
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Modification de File:BERCHEM Nicolaes - Loenen sur la Vecht, Château de Cronenburch - Detail 02.jpg
[edit]Hi :-)
New name you have proposed can be confusing. It can make technical problems on many web sites. It is better not to use "File:" twice. And it is better to use Criterion #1: At the original uploader's request. Uploaders have special favours ;-) Yours, Wieralee (talk) 19:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the information; sorry I'm quite new on this site and I made a mistake; Thanks also for the criterion #1! By the way, I apologize for these 12 mistakes.... The problem with copy/paste...
Category:Details_by_GERMANY_15th-c. has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 20:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Categorising
[edit]Please read Commons:Catégories before going on. Thank you. --Achim (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Creating categories
[edit]Please stop creating categories! Most of them will be deleted because they are either out of naming scheme or are named badly so one has to guess what could be meant. --Achim (talk) 11:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Discussion on COM:ANU
[edit]This is to inform you about a discussion on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems regarding you behaviour. Please be so kind to tell us your point of view. Best, --Achim (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Chers utilisateurs,
j'ai énormément de mal à distinguer les messages "système" et ceux qui me sont adressés , et à quel endroit ils se situent sur la page ...
Lorsque j'ai crée les dernières categories citées par "Achim", je n'avais absolument pas vu son message d'avertissement de ne plus rien créer (merci de vérifier leur datation pour preuve de ma bonne foi - sachant que l'horloge wiki affiche Deux heures de moins que l'heure française).
Sachez que je ne me serais pas premise de créer des catégories sans contenu : vous pouvez vérifier qu'aucune d'entre elles n'est vide, et que, toutes forment un ensemble cohérent et expliqué en en-tête de catégorie. Je vous envoie les liens concernés :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Details_by_artist
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Artists_about_Artists
Le contenu de toutes ces categories est amené à être rempli au fil d'un travail de gestion d' un grand nombre de fichiers personnels. Si ce travail autour de l'art, par la connaissance de ses details et des artistes qui en parlent, ne correspond pas, pédagogiquement au Projet Wiki, merci de me le faire savoir.
Evidemment, je suis plus que désolée de n'avoir jamais pu communiquer correctement avec aucun des utilisateurs wiki, ne pratiquant pas du tout l'anglais.
Mon intention en faisant ce travail est de rendre vivants les tableaux, de les rendre plus présents, afin de donner envie au plus grand nombre de les regarder sans s'ennuyer, et pas seulement les voir "en passant".
Je suis évidemment ouverte à toute discussion avec vous (en français si possible)qui pourrait m'aider à contribuer positivement à wikimedia commons sans en dénaturer l'esprit.
envoi copie sur ce lien :
— Preceding unsigned comment added by L'artauprésent (talk • contribs)
Category:Drawings_by_painter has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 06:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:BERNARD_about_Artists has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Category:BERNARD_Emile_by_himself has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Emile BERNARD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |