User talk:Kroton/2013

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Dąbrowa Tarnowska, kościół Najświętszej Marii Panny Szkaplerznej 2013-05-31--10-15-49-003 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 18:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Nieczajna Górna, kościół Siedmiu Boleści Najświętszej Maryi Panny 2013-05-31--09-55-58-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kor!An 10:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Dąbrowa Tarnowska, kościół Najświętszej Marii Panny Szkaplerznej 2013-05-31--10-15-49-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit iffy on the left but ok. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Dzień dobry, chcielibyśmy poinformować Pana, że zdjęcie (Wiki-Commons) przedstawiające wieżę ratuszową w Jaworze – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2013 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "wieże". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa. http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2013/07/10/wieza-ratuszowa-jawor-pl/ Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza. Pozdrawiamy FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, osiedle Rzochów kaplica grobowa Sękowskich 2013-07-05--11-16-30-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żabno, rynek 2013-05-31--14-41-06-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiernica URB 2013-07-10--14-25-17-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the truck needs new wheels... --Rolf H. 07:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PL-Bóbrka, skansen 2013-07-10--13-44-13-004.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PL-Bóbrka, skansen 2013-07-10--13-44-13-004.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Takze

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

nie maja licencji. Jak mi podasz licencje to moge ja dodac botem. --Jarekt (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Blizne, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 2013-07-10--09-10-08-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Blizne, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 2013-07-10--09-29-40-002 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. A bit of noise in some areas (see notes)--Lmbuga 23:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Dąbrowa Tarnowska, brama zamkowa 2013-05-31--10-19-52-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sorry, it's a good image, but, in my opinion, not QI (I'm not sure): jpg artifacts IMO, to much noise reduction, white halo at top... see notes--Lmbuga 23:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Thank you. New version uploaded. Kroton 19:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)  Support QI--Lmbuga 23:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, kaplica grobowa Boguszów 2013-07-05--11-21-05-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. Blue Elf 19:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Haczów kościół Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny 2013-07-10--10-37-27-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 00:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Lisia Góra, kościół św. Wojciecha 2013-07-09--17-29-16-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 20:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Lisia Góra, kościół św. Wojciecha 2013-07-09--17-28-00-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 20:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, Rynek 22 2013-07-02--10-05-29-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żarnowiec, dworek 2013-07-10--16-09-37-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żarnowiec, dworek 2013-07-10--15-56-41-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Rzemień, pałac Szaszkiewiczów 2013-07-05--20-48-06-001 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 22:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Dolne, kościół św. Franciszka z Asyżu, krzyż ze słupka ogrodzenia kościoła 2013-05-11--13-20-10-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Górne, kościół św. Anny 2013-05-11--12-18-32-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Laitche 19:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Radgoszcz, kościół św. Kazimierza 2013-05-31--09-44-00-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Radgoszcz, kościół św. Kazimierza 2013-05-31--09-46-33-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some small overexposed reflections, but not really disturbing. QI for me. --Smial 08:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Radgoszcz, kościół św. Kazimierza 2013-05-31--09-48-32-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat tight crop, but all in all QI. --Smial 08:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, osiedle Rzochów resztki kapliczki 2013-07-05--11-23-14-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, palacyk Oborskich 2013-07-02--09-50-10-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, palacyk Oborskich 2013-07-02--09-50-50-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, palacyk Oborskich 2013-07-02--09-55-08-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Nowy Wiśnicz, zamek 2013-07-09--14-26-33-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise and slighty oversharpned, but overall ok imo. High resolution.--ArildV 13:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, kościół św. Marka 2013-05-26--17-18-07-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, kościół św. Marka 2013-04-21--16-08-22-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, kamienica Dębickich 2013-06-02--13-37-16-001 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, cmentarz parafialny, kaplica 2013-07-02--10-18-13-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 07:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, PSM 2013-05-11--18-23-56-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, bazylika św. Mateusza 2013-04-21--15-58-19-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, bazylika św. Mateusza 2013-05-06--06-12-38-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, kościół św. Marka 2013-06-02--13-24-45-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, cmentarz parafialny, kaplica 2013-04-21--16-57-59-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, kopalnia soli 2013-07-09--08-53-15-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Lmbuga 21:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, kopalnia soli 2013-07-09--08-51-50-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, bazylika św. Mateusza 2013-07-27--19-58-04-001 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 19:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bóbrka, skansen 2013-07-10--13-44-13-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-04-12-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 23:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-20-50-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żarnowiec, dworek 2013-07-10--16-11-06-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Kołaczyce, dom 2013-07-10--17-37-11-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Blizne, plebania 2013-07-10--09-26-45-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bóbrka, skansen 2013-07-10--14-28-29-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. --Tufta 21:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Kołaczyce, kościół św. Anny 2013-07-10--17-38-37-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Kołaczyce, kościół św. Anny 2013-07-10--17-51-40-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a borderline case. Both car and wires are VERY disturbing. Nonetheless the image quality and composition is definetely on QI level. --Tuxyso 21:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bóbrka, skansen 2013-07-10--14-26-07-005 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odporyszów, dzwonnica kościóła Oczyszczenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny 2013-05-31--12-44-11-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:57, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, cmentarz parafialny, ogrodzeie 2013-07-02--10-28-13-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, palacyk Oborskich 2013-07-02--09-52-03-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Kołaczyce, kościół św. Anny 2013-07-10--17-45-47-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction, the wall at right is leaning out and also CA (top right) --Christian Ferrer 18:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)  Done thanks --Kroton 19:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC) You have just crop the right, it's ok for CA but, it need always a little perspective correction --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Now all should be ok --Kroton 10:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, kopalnia soli 2013-07-09--08-52-09-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's a good picture but, sorry, dust spot (see note), the sy is too noisy, the vertical lines of the half right are tilted CCW--Lmbuga 18:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)  Done thanks --Kroton 19:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, PSM 2013-07-02--09-21-15-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow, nearly 50 MB. It's a very little bit noisy in the sky, but I think it's QI. --XRay 17:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Górne, kościół św Anny 2013-05-11--12-17-52-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow, more than 30 MB. It's a very little bit noisy in the sky, but I think it's QI. --XRay 17:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-16-19-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-16-40-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-18-54-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Nowy Wiśnicz, zamek, fortyfikacje 2013-07-09--14-23-19-001 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and clear photo Azusa 10:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, bazylika św. Mateusza 2013-04-21--16-17-16-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, cmentarz parafialny, ogrodzeie 2013-07-02--10-29-18-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odporyszów, dzwonnica kościóła Oczyszczenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny 2013-05-31--12-41-32-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A touch oversharpened, it seems, but overall done right --Daniel Case 05:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Dolne, kościół św. Franciszka z Asyżu 2013-05-11--13-22-16-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Dolne, kościół św. Franciszka z Asyżu 2013-05-11--13-12-03-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See note  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-18-19-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 19:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-16-19-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-16-40-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Odrzykoń, zamek Kamieniec 2013-07-10--12-18-54-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Nowy Wiśnicz, zamek, fortyfikacje 2013-07-09--14-23-19-001 cr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and clear photo Azusa 10:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żabno, kościół Ducha Świętego 2013-05-31--14-43-12-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, bazylika św. Mateusza 2013-09-07--18-16-29-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żabno, kościół Ducha Świętego 2013-05-31--14-51-22-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żabno, kościół Ducha Świętego 2013-05-31--14-53-30-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Żabno, kościół Ducha Świętego 2013-05-31--14-50-45-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Wadowice Dolne, kościół św. Franciszka z Asyżu, krzyż ze słupka ogrodzenia kościoła 2013-05-11--13-20-10-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Mielec, zegar słoneczny z gmachu I LO 2013-10-13--15-04-04-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 09:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL - Wadowice Górne - cmentarz - 2011-11-06 - 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL - Mielec - cmentarz parafialny - Kroton 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow is a bit disturbing, but QI to me. . --Cayambe 07:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Częstochowa, kościół Świętej Urszuli Ledóchowskiej 2012-05-27--11-34-03-143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 12:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, The VI Ploughmen Village Archaeological Park 2013-08-16--14-06-26-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PL-Częstochowa, kościół Świętej Urszuli Ledóchowskiej 2012-05-27--11-34-03-143.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PL-Częstochowa, kościół Świętej Urszuli Ledóchowskiej 2012-05-27--11-34-03-143.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, The VI Ploughmen Village Archaeological Park 2013-08-16--14-38-43-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, The VI Ploughmen Village Archaeological Park 2013-08-16--14-13-46-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 16:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Kolbuszowa, skansen 2013-08-04--16-25-48-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, The VI Ploughmen Village Archaeological Park 2013-08-16--14-25-49-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:53, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Kroton, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PL-Bochnia, The VI Ploughmen Village Archaeological Park 2013-08-16--14-35-19-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok now --Cccefalon 19:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Kroton, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Image missing licence

Despite this File:PL-Wadowice Dolne, kościół św. Franciszka z Asyżu, krzyż ze słupka ogrodzenia kościoła 2013-05-11--13-20-10-002.jpg being promoted to quality image there has never been a copyright tag attached to the image that you uploaded and no one even noticed. Would you like to correct it? It is listed in Category:Media without a license: needs history check and therefore may be deleted. Ww2censor (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)