User talk:Krd/archive/2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ticket:2019092410009707

Guten Morgen Krd, "Arthur Crbz (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Solar-Ausbautempo-in-Deutschland.gif (No OTRS permission for 30 days)". Ich verstehe das nicht. Wo könnte das Problem liegen? Ist das ein Versehen? Ich habe versucht einen undeletion request zu starten. Da ich kein OTRS-Team-Mitglied bin darf ich das in diesem Fall nicht. Welche Handliungsmöglichkeiten gibt es? Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Das war sicher ein Irrtum, ich habe es wiederhergestellt. --Krd 08:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
oh, sehr schön, vielen Dank! --Molgreen (talk) 08:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Mussklprozz

Hi. I've noticed @Mussklprozz: is adding OTRS Received templates on files he has upload himself. May you drop him a line about the situation? Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

I cannot find any example, please provide details. --Krd 14:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
He possibly means File:Esther_Artner.jpg. The rights holder sent the picture in one email along with the permission. I have no personal interest in the picture and saw it only as a technical help to upload it. Since the email is preserved in OTRS, the whole situation is completely transparent. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
It is part of the story that OTRS photosubmission is uploaded and processed by the same user. In this particular case, though, I don't understand how the author can be unknown. Please recheck the ticket. --Krd 14:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Okay, if that is considered a problem, I will in the future assign the ticket to someone else after I uploaded the picture. I will also check the ticket in question and then assign it to someone else. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Krd, looks like your User:Krd/gallery2020 of your UP is gone. Lotje (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hasn't been created yet, now done. --Krd 15:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Victoria and the Crowd.jpg

hi krd I show you this photograph of the late nineteenth century, and I would like to ask you according to you, if it is a file of pd 100 or 70???? I can't see if the author has the name or if it is unknown???--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

vermutete URV

Hallo Krd, eine Bitte, kannst du einmal unter Special:Contributions/Werner_von_Basil schauen, er hat eine Menge Bilder als URV gekennzeichnet, obwohl sie von Flicktreview einwandfrei durchgegangen sind und daher doch keine Schwierigkeiten machen dürfen. danke und lg K@rl (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Für mich sieht das so aus, als hätte er recht. Wenn fraglich ist, ob das Foto rechtmäßig auf Flickr steht, ist der Flickr-Review natürlich nicht viel wert. --Krd 09:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Warum soll fraglich sein, ob das Foto rechtmäßig auf Flickr steht? Wenn man sich die Flickr-Seite ansieht, ist die einzige logische Schlussfolgerung, dass es hier eine langjährige Zusammenarbeit zwischen de:Die Grünen Kärnten und dem Fotografen gab. Das war definitiv kein Fall für eine Schnelllöschung. Dieser Landesverband lädt manche andere Bilder mit dem Vermerk "Alle Rechte vorbehalten" hoch. Die gelösschten Bilder waren aber eben alle mit CC-Lizenz hochgeladen. Außerdem gibt es bei Wikimedia Commons schon sehr sehr viele Bilder von eben genau dieser Flickr-Seite, die nach Jahren bis heute nicht beanstandet wurden. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 12:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Den möglichen Grund hat Werner_von_Basil doch in den Löschantrag aufgeführt. Das müsste man sich im Detail anschauen. --Krd 12:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Und dann war das eben definitiv kein Fall für eine Schnelllöschung. Dem Landesverband einer professionellen politischen Partei kann man schon zutrauen, dass er ganz bewusst eine Lizenz auswählt und nicht zufällig manche Bilder mit CC-Lizenz und manche mit "Alle Rechte vorbehalten" markiert sind. Es spricht sogar Vieles dafür, dass der Fotograf selbst die Bilder hochgeladen hat. Es handelt sich nämlich wohl um Günter Krammer, der aktiv in die Partei eingebunden war. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 12:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Man kann geteilter Meinung sein, aber ich gebe Dir Recht dass eine Schnelllöschung hier nicht der perfekte Weg war. Der nächste Schritt wäre, den löschenden Admin anzusprechen. --Krd 12:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Temp admin rights for a enWS admin to undertake some xwiki moves

Hi P. There are 260 images that I need to get moved from C to enWS (after being undeleted). Magnus has a script for the process though it needs dual admin rights here and target. I can do some, though it is a laborious process, and I am somewhat restricted for time. Are we able to temporarily grant admin rights to user:Mpaa for a few days to assist get the files moved. I am happy to vouch for Mpaa's competency.

Magnus's script has an OAuth component, and you go into the Special:Delete for the file, it shows the usage at the target site, and with a check box allows you to push the file and file page to that site with modification the filepage example, when delivered it says OK, then one can simply delete the file as stage 2. So I would be asking for Mpaa to be able to able to push the file/filepage and then delete here, If that is not meeting requirements we could just do the push stage and then ask a local admin to complete deletion. Third possible solution is to have an admin here be granted enWS rights and push the files over, though admins here are generally already busy enough. So I suggest the first where we get existing enWS to do the deeds, and to keep withing the boundaries of the tasks. Thanks for the consideration.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't see that we can grant admin rights on Commons for such task. But if we can arrange a time schedule we should be able to temporarily undelete the files for the transfer. --Krd 07:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
It is my understanding that the files have been undeleted. It is the one by one process of moving that is painful and I cannot do at this moment. The system itself fights people transferring files out of Commons, see s:special:diff/9849033 for those explorations, so admin rights is the only reasonable means to achieve.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand yet what would be easier if the user had sysop flag. What is the exact difference then? --Krd 11:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Ticket:2019121910006777

Hallo Krd, da vermutlich du dieses Ticket bearbeitet hattest: wieso wird bei File:Evandro Agazzi, 2014.jpg der Benutzer/Hochlader Bargioni als Urheber angegeben, wenn die EXIF-Daten eindeutig "Gianni Proietti" bzw. "Gianni Proietti - PONTIFICIA UNIVERSITA' SANTA CROCE" als Fotografen und Rechteinhaber ausweisen? --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, danke für die Frage. Grundfsätzlich kann der Rechteinhaber in Absprache mit dem Urheber die Art der Namensnennung frei wählen, weiter kann der Urheber auf die Namensnennung verzichten oder sogar verlangen, nicht genannt zu werden. Wie der Fall hier aussieht, kann ich Dir leider nicht sagen, aber ich nehme das zum Anlass, den Rechteinhaber nochmal danach zu fragen. --Krd 11:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Prima. Es ist nämlich so, dass der Benutzer noch jede Menge weitere Fotos vom selben Fotografen hochgeladen hat, die bislang allerdings noch ohne Ticket sind. --Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Der Einsender der Freigabe gibt an, dass das so in Ordnung ist. --Krd 16:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Rajd na Zieloną Wyspę (Green Island).jpg

If the pervious permission in that image: [1] was not enough please delete it now. PawelDS (talk) 07:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

The ticket doesn't support this file. It may be that a permission is achievable, but currently it is not in the ticket. --Krd 08:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

@Krd, so could you delete it? I wanted to translate the text from Herew into Polish and I thought that this OTS will support it. I will use the Hebrew version of image then. PawelDS (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 11:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

@Krd, thank you very much. I am sorry for the problem. Greetings, PawelDS (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:IGF 2019 Presse-Akkreditierung

Whats wrong with the ticket? I checked the number that I was mailed from permissions and it matches the number in the template. --C.Suthorn (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

A ticket under that number does not exist, and I cannot find any matching ticket. If possible please reply to the original confirmation. --Krd 18:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Headers of the original mail:

Organization: Wikimedia
Subject: [Ticket#2019112810008849] Confirmation of receipt (Re: UN Internet Governan [...])
X-Powered-BY: OTRS (https://otrs.com/)
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:36:02 +0000
X-Mailer: OTRS Mail Service (5.0.39)
From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <1574969761.898683.170814229@ticket.wikimedia.org>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-aa2097f8-9c94-4134-a6a6-4f51cfcb901f-1574969757323@3c-app-gmx-bs73>

new mail got auto-reply [Ticket#2020021610004041] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Aw: [Ticket#20191128 [...])

--C.Suthorn (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

@Krd: ping. --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your reply was received, nevertheless the original ticket does not exist. If possible, please send the original permission again. --Krd 15:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I have forwarded the original mail to the new ticket number. --C.Suthorn (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I have now confirmed the new ticket. --Krd 07:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Martirio di S. Orsola.png

hi krd i would like to ask you the immediate restoration of this painting made by RUBENS around the beginning of the seventeenth century (XVIIth Century) --Bernhard Moltke (talk) 21:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 05:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Mircea Ciobanu

User:Asybaris01 hat alle Dateien in Category:Mircea Ciobanu speedy-markiert, weil "The copyright holder no longer agrees with the release of the images (all Mircea Ciobanu) on wikipedia". Da du auf die Dateien ein (vorläufiges) OTRS-tag gesetzt hattest, wollte ich mich nur rückversichern, ob für diese Dateien letztlich noch keine gültiger Genehmigung vorlag/liegt. Dann würde ich sie schnelllöschen. Andernfalls müsste man sie in eine DR überführen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Das Ticket ist noch offen, allerdings in rumänisch, d.h. es wird wahrscheinlich nicht kurzfristig bearbeitet werden. Ich empfehle die Bilder erstmal zu löschen. --Krd 08:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Damit die Sache nicht zu einfach wird, gibt es aber auch ein paar Dateien, die ein abgeschlossenes (orange) OTRS-Ticket tragen:
Soll ich die auch löschen? --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Da wäre es das beste, den Bearbeiter zu fragen, also den Kollegen, der das OTRS hinzugefügt hat. Ich kann die Sprache nicht lesen und bin mir nicht sicher. --Krd 10:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
delete the following images 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Asybaris01 (talk) 11:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@Asybaris01: Please provide a reason. --Krd 16:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

ClayAMC no longer wants to post them and now I also have a conflict because she reminds me of the opening of a defamation process for the artist who died 30 years ago. As a result I announced the administrators on ro.wiki and contacted legal@wikimedia.org for legal support. For the moment, at ro.wiki the article Mircea Ciobanu is deleted and a version of it is available to the administrator ro: user: Gikü for further restoration, I do not know when this will be done - desirable over 6 months, a year, I do not know when they will decide. Asybaris01 (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I have now deleted all of them, as the situation on OTRS is unclear. They can be restored later if the permission turns out to be valid. --Krd 08:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Global Association of Economics Education Logo.png

Hi. It appears that you managed the OTRS on this image. I note that the contributor is the author of five wikipedia articles about the organisation for which the image is the logo. I am looking to have confirmed that the contributor has a potential a conflict of interest in the article w:Global Association of Economics Education. If that is the case I would appreciate if you could make such a statement at the deletion discussion w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Association of Economics Education.

I also note that the same contributor d:special:Contributions/Nguyen.asia.18 has edits at Wikidata including for a person in that organisation Q79835203. If you see that there is further conflict of interest then I wish to notify user:1997kB as the administrator who has been following my deletion requests at Wikidata around paid editing and blackhat SEO ref spam.

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: could you explain how asking an OTRS volunteer to release specific private information about the person from emails in OTRS, with the express aim of exposing a Wikipedia contributor not a breach of WP:OUTING?
To my reading, what you are requesting is for Krd to intentionally break the OTRS Users Confidentiality Agreement - Nonpublic Information. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Fæ has valid points here. --Krd 14:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
I have not asked you to publicly release any private information. I have asked for you to comment on whether there is a conflict of interest. The answer could be no. The answer can be that I cannot comment. The answer could be that matters related to paid editing, conflicts of interest, sockpuppetry would need to be managed by checkusers.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I personally don't see any conflict of interest. --Krd 12:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mwoolliams

Could you link the ticket in the resore-note on the DR? DMacks (talk) 15:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm not an OTRS, so I can't see it, but some of the items are third-party. Two examples: File:THE MULBERRY HOUSE SCHOOL, LONDON.jpg is potentially even {{FoP-UK}}, but its noted source (Simon Kennedy) is not the same as the others (Doug Clelland) who is presumably an architect/designer of it. File:Gods Brains.png is one of multiple book covers, where the uploader is the claimed license-holder, which is quite unusual for the publishing world. For the record, on en.wp, the uploader states that they are not Clelland themself, which is at odds with their use of that name linked to their account as file-source here on commons). DMacks (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm not done with reviewing the images, please give some minutes. --Krd 15:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
I have now put some images to OTRS-received which in my opinion require additional clarification. If you think there are more, please let me know. I cannot answer if the uploader account is Clelland themself, as the OTRS confidentiality doesn't allow that. --Krd 16:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Máxima

Dear Krd, As I told Taivo: who will restore the broken links to Category:Máxima of the Netherlands? The creator is renaming categories on a large scale, comparable to this former colleague, and isn't taking care of loose ends. Vysotsky (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

If is is a single problem, please let me know in detail how I can help. If it is a large scale issue, please address it on the administrators' noticeboard. --Krd 19:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The OTRS Barnstar
For your prodigious work at OTRS, you almost always get to a ticket at photopermissions before me! —  JGHowes  talk 17:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Luna-16.jpg

Hello. Would you consider undeleting the reupload of Luna-16.jpg? The new source, NASA Commons Flickr, has a "No known copyright restrictions" license. W3r456 (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Please put the request on COM:UNDEL for community feedback. --Krd 17:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

OTRS-Ticket nicht lesbar Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard?

Ich hatte die Mail für Vector Racing vorbereitet und danach vom GF auch weiter geleitet bekommen, ich kann die Mail lesen. Ich habe wie üblich genau das Standard-email-Template verwendet, entsprechend war der Wikilink, als auch der Weblink angegeben. Kannst du dir die Mail nativ anschauen? Was läuft denn da schief? Was ist bei Euch konkret angekommen, der Reply sah auch schon nicht gut aus? Kodierungsfehler/HTML-Fehler? Danke im Voraus, Gruß --Pitlane02 🏁 talk 12:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Ja. Die Formatierung der Mail ist kaputt, es steht kein Dateiname drin. Bitte neu schicken. --Krd 12:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Plöd, ok, kommt. Danke erstmal und Gruß --Pitlane02 🏁 talk 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

State Archives

hi krd, I would like to ask you the immediate restoration of these files, scanned by the Mantua state archive. these files depict maps related to the military-defensive structures of the City of Mantua, they are scanned images, so he is not found in the google search results. I would need their immediate restoration please?

--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Please elaborate the copyright status of each file. --Krd 20:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
they are scanned images, all files have an unknown artist, half are from the 19th Century and only two should be from a period before the 19th Century--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Can you provide some evidence for that? --Krd 06:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
as I said before, these are scanned images taken from a book kept in the state archives. here on intenert, it is impossible to try to certify their status, because the information they find is not part of the Google search engine, because it is information they generate from outside the world of the internet. you see, I have managed to see something through the LOG, but you are an administrator, you can see the entire file with the complete information, attach the file, however it is scanned images, other than really saying. if you restore them, I immediately start looking for information regarding these files, so I could broaden the range of these files, which in your opinion would seem to be poor in information.
hi krd, ler I write for informal that I finally managed to find some information that can be useful for restoring the following files. the files were scanned directly from this book here, and the following book is currently kept in the state archives. I can't really tell you more more--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
In which year has the book been published, who is the creator of the drawings, when did the creator die, or what else is the reason they are in the public domain? --Krd 12:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
everything is written in the link related to the message, I already told him more I don't know. alas I'm not a writer, but one thing is certain, I know that the author who created the following images is unknown !! and the images are not absolutely recent, although they come from a scan of a book published in 2010. the authority of the artist who created the ancient images or that of the author who took the ancient images to publish them on the book is worth more. I just want to say that in my opinion they are all PD-100 license files, because if we evaluate the author of a book still alive and well who publishes an ancient portrait on the book, then what should we do? declare that the creator of the portrait is the author of the book ?? it seems absurd to me. I conclude that as far as copyright has been expired for more than a century, it doesn't rain on this at all. and then, since you are the administrator, only and only you can see the deleted file, I do not want to--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 18:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't consider this convincing. If you like to get another opinion, please see: COM:UNDEL. --Krd 18:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thanks for the indication, but remember that in the future I will not fail to submit some files (linked if possible) with a pd license, I will try not to insert a similar plank AHAHA goodbye and thank you--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rue Vieille Pousterle à Auch au début du 20ème siècle.jpg

License tags is still not fixed. Please take a look. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Done now. --Krd 21:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Restore File:Carlos Ibanez.jpg

Hi there. I have noticed (as Commonsdelinker removed the file from use) you have deleted File:Carlos Ibanez.jpg. This file, as B1mbo properly says, is in the public domain in Chile. The copyright law enacted in 1970 provided anonymous works 30 years of protection. Those of this picture expired, then, by 1 January 1983. (Only in the 1990s the law was changed to protect 50 years, and then in the 2000s extended to 70 years) --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 22:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I have restored the file after having read template:PD-Chile again. Thank you for the notice! --Krd 22:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Krd. Have a good day! --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 23:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Upload wizard & deletion log issue

You may be interested in Phab:T246879, which highlights that users are not correctly directed to details for previously deleted files. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Commons Appeals

Dear Krd,

Thanks for your contribution to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#An_Appeals_and_Mediation_Board:_a_proposal!
I didn't answer your question

"Just curious, if you have so many problems with OTRS agents or procedures, have you tried to get in contact with OTRS agents or admins and discuss the issues?"

  • Yes, i first contacted another Bureaucrat a few months ago, who did not respond, later a Commons admin, who did answer but did not address the proposal and only gave the links to the known information pages.

Last December i tried in vain to save my GLAM's files from unnecessary deletion on the OTRS Notice Board. Nowhere some protection/appeal is specified for uploaders, is Commons in the end sometimes just a blind autocracy with ignorant authoritarians? So, should i mention names? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 07:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

So you contacted two persons who in fact didn't react, and nothing more? As said at the other place, appeals to OTRS volunteer decisions can be addressed to the group of OTRS volunteers. Conduct issues with OTRS agents can be addressed to OTRS admins. If nothing of that happened, your proposal is pointless. --Krd 12:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
1. No, one admin in fact responded, but "...did not address the proposal and only gave the links to the known information pages" (see the above, and "Feedback", where the Administrators Noticeboard is not mentioned).
2. You write "appeals to OTRS volunteer decisions can be addressed to the group of OTRS volunteers" by which you perhaps mean an OTRS mailing list? I was not aware of this mailing list and do not have access to it, that's correct as i am not an OTRS-NL member. So how could i address this "group of OTRS volunteers"?
3. And OK, if Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard can serve for appeals, than effectively they are "my" proposed Mediation and Appeals Board. My case of 500 deletions from Category:A. A. van Achterberg Collection: I complained on some pages, to which i was referred, but that precisely was the reason the deleting moderator did not want to undelete in the first place: too many mentions. Then an undeletion request was denied, because the moderator previously did not want to undelete...
4. You say "pointless"? But then the whole point of Wikimedia is that we make things clear and publicly accessible, also the rules of Commons if someone does not know, isn't it? How could (s)he know?
I'm still curious of your opinion, please. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
OTRS deals with confidential information. As the case itself is confidential, so likely is the appeal, so the appeal should be directed by e-mail to the OTRS team, and if that fails, to the OTRS admins, which are listed at m:OTRS. Please advise at which place any documentation can be improved. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Bitte valable Begründung für die Löschung angeben!

Geht um das Photo von J. Thomas Lambrecht hier. Die Nutzungsrechtsverhältnisse wurden mit eMail von J. Thomas Lambrecht vom 13.03.2020 persönlich nachgereicht - abgeschickt von seinem persönlichen eMail-Konto, das ihm von der Universität Basel zur Verfügung gestellt wird; derzeit ist er noch daran, weitere Details einzuholen: die beiden Photographen an jenem Kongress wurden kontaktiert - die Antwort des den Kongress veranstaltenden Professors in Wien ist noch ausstehend. Unter diesen Umständen eine Löschung vorzunehmen schreit fast nach einer VM! Bitte J. Thomas Lambrecht informieren, weshalb seine Nutzungsrechtsangaben ungenügend sein sollen und was noch benötigt wird, um diese zu erfüllen, sowie ihm eine substantielle Löschbegründung nachreichen (an seine persönliche eMail-Adresse schicken). --ProloSozz (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Re:

the following inherent source, it is a scan in this book [2], from the information obtained, all the authors who made these postcards of the early 1900s are all unknown. it seems obvious to me that given that the setting of the file only concerns Italy, it is right to apply the license (PD-Italy)--Erkerßrand (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

OTRS Robert Sowers

Hi, Krd. Thanks for adding the OTRS-template to the works of Robert Sowers. I'd like to ask if the OTRS-ticket provides a permission for the photograph taken by Doris Barnes as well, which I think would be far from obvious – why would the estate of Sowers owe the rights to Barnes'work? There's another portrait of Sowers too (by 'JJ'?), which you tagged as permission provided, and then there's the series of photographs from the sixties (though the file page says 2020): who is the maker and is a permission indeed provided? Finally, the uploader named him- or herself as the maker of all files, not dating the work either: should OTRS change all this, since information has been provided, or do we just keep it as it is (sloppy)? Thanks, greetings, Eissink (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC).

Hello. Can you provide a link to the photograph taken by Doris Barnes?
I usually keep it sloppy, because the copyright holder decides about the kind of the attribution, and is asked to check and verify during the OTRS process. --Krd 07:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer, maybe I make to much hassle about it. This picture says 'by Doris Barnes' in the filename, and this one is apparently by 'JJ'. Eissink (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC).
Oh, I see now that the Doris Barnes picture doesn't have an OTRS-permission, which makes my questions a bit silly... I guess everything is alright. Thanks, Eissink (talk) 11:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC).
Not at all silly, mistakes also happen at OTRS side, so if anything looks implausible a double check is always appreciated. (The JJ image has already been addressed and is ok.) --Krd 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

ESTE

HELLO MR. KRD, I WRITE THEM, BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR THE IMMEDIATE RESTORATION OF THE FOLLOWING PORTRAITS, SINCE THEY WERE PART OF SOME WIKIPEDIAN VOICES, FOR THESE SOME, I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FIND A STOCK OF THE LINKS

--37.182.21.58 21:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:木村拓哉.png

Hello. I want to talk about File:木村拓哉.png. As I had already added the link when I uploaded the picture and given the license that the author of the picture who claim as well, therefore I am confused that what kinds of materials you prefer. Sorry for disturbing, Thank you.-AT (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Please let the photographer send permission as described in COM:OTRS. --Krd 10:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
{{YouTube CC-BY}} is not enough?-AT (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
It is, my mistake, sorry! Issue resolved. --Krd 09:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Block of KarlWettinWMSE-bot

Hi Krd,

I'm not quite sure why you blocked User:KarlWettinWMSE-bot today. The changelog Special:Contributions/KarlWettinWMSE-bot says 

Krd talk contribs blocked KarlWettinWMSE-bot talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, autoblock disabled) (unapproved bot)

but I'm not pickup up why from this.

Fröhliches Ostern aus Schweden! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Wettin (WMSE) (talk • contribs) 16:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello. It appears you found back to the bot request page, so I suggest we continue there. --Krd 16:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I'm still not quite sure what the reason for the block was though? Why was that? Karl Wettin (WMSE) (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
The bot is, as I understand it, now approved but still blocked. Can you please advice? Karl Wettin (WMSE) (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Karl, Commons:Bots/Requests/KarlWettinWMSE-bot is a request, and I don't yet see any approval on that page. Please stay patient. If there is any need to hurry, please describe the situation on the bot request page. --Krd 07:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Sure I'll write something there. But what was the reason for the block? Karl Wettin (WMSE) (talk) 11:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
See Commons:Bots: "All bots running on Wikimedia Commons must have advance permission to do so." --Krd 11:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Revert

That deletion is being merged into Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads Copyvio, please let me finish my reordering. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I have seen it afterwards. Please continue. --Krd 16:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
No problem, it's ok. :) --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your apparent misunderstandings on Appeals and mediation

Dear Krd,

I see now that our discussion about the possibility to appeal and ask for mediation has been rightly archived as the case was really not taken seriously. Let me correct your last misunderstandings:

  1. i started out at the beginning to ask whether the Notice board was the right place to discuss this...
  2. i was blocked for starting to explain what had happened when you asked me, i warned you beforehand it wouldn't be pleasant you saw that, right? So it was impossible there to prove as you know well. It requires translated sections of emails etcetera.
  • Why don't you understand that where there is power, there will always be abuse of power in the long run, you know the history lessons? So a University donation which i worked on, was blocked for more than a month (December 2019-January 2020) while there was legal permission already months earlier. OTRS and Commons couldn't solve this without some outside pressure, so not by me. Organisations don't like discussions of their problems, isn't it? I will turn to the standard general email address you gave, for permissions. Enjoy the sun i hope! Hansmuller (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Missbrauch ? ! ?

Hallo @Krd: , schau' bitte mal auf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:19891002_xl_Postkarte-Wurzelfichte-bei-Buckow-in-der-Maerkischen-Schweiz-Fotograf-unbekannt-Heimat-und-Bild-Reichenbach-Vogtland.jpg Das sieht mir wie Missbrauch aus. Ich kann das aber auch nicht rückgängig machen. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Passiert so etwas öfter? --Molgreen (talk) 16:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hallo. Ich habe das nun gelöscht. Vandalismus kommt leider vor. --Krd 17:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! --Molgreen (talk) 18:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Krd. I need your help with OTRS access. Thank you. 8zhnezmwwgfhzez דוג'רית (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Löschung Wappen und Wappenbrief

Sehr geehrter Krd Ich hätte gerne gewusst, warum das Wappen und der Wappenbrief - der nachweisbar von meiner Familie stammt - gelöscht wurde ! Ich ersuche um Stellungnahme, Hochachtungsvoll,

Gerhard Gleixner (v. Rosenbrunn) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosenbrunn (talk • contribs) 22:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Wer hat diese Zeichnung angefertigt, in welchem Jahr ist sie entstanden? --Krd 04:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Wiederherstellung in der Zukunft Ticket:2020042010008016 - Private area: "Legacy - Safe" (in German: Privater Bereich: „Vermächtnis - Tresor“)

Hallo Krd, wir hatten per [Ticket#2020042010008016] vorbesprochen, dass ich eine Datei als Besipiel für eine spätere Wiederveröffentlichung hochlade. Dies habe ich mit der Postkarte: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:19891002_xl_Postkarte-Wurzelfichte-bei-Buckow-in-der-Maerkischen-Schweiz-Fotograf-unbekannt-Heimat-und-Bild-Reichenbach-Vogtland.jpg getan. Schau' Dir dies bitte mal an. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Das sieht ja schon fest perfekt aus. Der einzige Punkt ist: Das "Category:Undelete_in_2120" in der gelöschten Datei kann nicht gefunden werden, daher kann das aus der Datei raus, und soll stattdessen in der Kategorieseite Category:Undelete in 2120 als Link aufgelistet werden. Natürlich für jede Datei mit der passenden Jahreszahl. --Krd 06:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, vielen Dank! Ist es richtig, dass ich diesen Abschnitt: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:19891002_xl_Postkarte-Wurzelfichte-bei-Buckow-in-der-Maerkischen-Schweiz-Fotograf-unbekannt-Heimat-und-Bild-Reichenbach-Vogtland.jpg angelegt habe? --Molgreen (talk) 18:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Category "Invisible"

Das Verfahren habe ich jetzt verstanden und finde es sehr OK.

Was mir nicht gefällt, ist die zeitweise Sichtbarkeit und die Möglichkeit des Downloads bzw. der Sicherung über www.archive.org der Dateien. (Das finde ich auch für die "normalen" OTRS-Verfahren nicht so schön.)
Könnte es nicht sehr sinnvoll sein, eine Category "Invisible" einzuführen ! ?
Beim Hochladen könnte die Category "Invisible" bereits vor der Veröffenbtlichung hinzugefügt werden.
Sie würde sicherstellen, dass nicht frei gegebene Bilder nur für angemeldete User (oder nur für Admins und den "Uploader") sichtbar sind.
Wie siehst Du das? --Molgreen (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Der undeletion request ist nicht nötig, Du kannst es direkt selbst (als "roten" link) in [[Category:Undelete in 2120]] einrtagen.
Dank, habe ich gerade gesehen:
"Invisible" ist mit Mediawiki technisch nicht abbildbar. Man könnte überlegen, einen Bot so aufzusetzen, dass es er wirklich schnell löscht, also innerhalb einer Minute. Da müsste aber erst vorbereitet werden. Um mal die Größenordnung abzuschätzen, wie viele Bilder möchtest Du denn ca. auf diese Weise hochladen? --Krd 18:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Im Moment denke ich nur an ein Projekt: https://vimeo.com/174367088 (in voller Länge). Hier will ich aber erst noch mit Frankreich Kontakt aufnehmen, um ganz sicher zu sein, wann die Gemeinfreiheit eintritt. Dazu brauche ich aber noch einige Zeit (Monate).
Wenn ich in einigen Jahren im Ruhestand sein werde . . ., werden es schon einige 100 Bilder sein . . .
Das mit dem Bot, wäre sehr gut, wenn der Hochladende das auch quasi selbst auslösen kann. --Molgreen (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Kannst Du die Entwicklung eines solchen Bot anregen? --Molgreen (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Ich kümmere mich drum, gib mir bitte einige Tage Zeit dafür. --Krd 04:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Danke, auf ein paar Tage kommt es nicht an. An dem Thema bin ich mittlerweile schon ein paar Jahre dran . . . --Molgreen (talk) 05:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Molgreen. Unter Commons:Bots/Requests/Krdbot 5 zeichnet sich der Tenor ab, dass wir aus unterschiedlichen Gründen nicht absichtlich große Mengen an Dateien hochladen sollten, die eindeutig aktuell nicht frei sind und auch nicht kurzfristig frei werden. Ich hatte offenbar nicht alles bedacht, und schließe mich der Argumentation jetzt an. --Krd 18:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, herzlichen Dank für die Mühe. Das ist sehr schade, aber ich kann die Argumentation auch sehr gut nachvollziehen. (Vielleicht ergibt sich ja irgendwann eine Möglichkeit für die Idee des „Vermächtnis-Tresors“...) Der Hinweis auf archive.org ist interessant. Vielleicht ergibt sich dort etwas oder in Zusammenarbeit von Wikimedia Commons und archive.org . . . (Da auch andere daran Interesse gezeigt haben, hoffe ich auf eine irgendwie geartete Lösung in der Zukunft...) Also noch einmal vielen Dank. --Molgreen (talk) 04:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Invalid OTRS 2018120110002261

Hi! Could you, please, tell me, why did you delete OTRS 2018120110002261, for example, here? As I remember, permission is for non-closed list of photos. Permission was specially performed in such manner to avoid writing permission for each single photo. Dinamik (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

The ticket contains a list of files it applies to, I don't see any valid statement which other files are affected. --Krd 08:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
We checked the sutuation and saw, that letter, that was send from photographer to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org, contains not only list of some files, but also categoric confirmation to previous uploads and statement with permission for future uploads for user:Dinamik. Reply from OTRS-member from permissions-ru@wikimedia.org with confirmation of accepting of permission (Re: [Ticket#2018120110002261]) also contains text with permission for other works (not only for a few works, which were listed in letter). Dinamik (talk) 04:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I have reverted my edits, as you appear to be right regarding the ticket. In any case OTRS permission shall not be added by the uploader, so we need to improve the procedure. Please advise: How many files of this series do you intend to upload related to this ticket? --Krd 05:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I've planned to upload a few dozens of photos in the nearest days and don't have information about quantity of further photos: it can be 1 photo once 6 months or it can be 10 photos once a week: I upload works of this photographer when she makes it and gives to me for uploading, it is not regular event. According to current procedure, as I understand, I have to ask someone to add existed OTRS permission to each new photo, or to ask photographer to send new permission to each new serie of photo (and in this case OTRS-permission will be added manually to each photo too). In any case, it is not good, because we loose time for manual adding OTRS permission to each photo. I tried to add photo with commonist, but it didn't work because of warning about adding OTRS permission by non-OTRS member. Is it possible to improve procedure, as you said? Dinamik (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Can you create a new custom license template per example of: Template:Gabriel Diamond Permission and adapt the wording accordingly so that it precisely describes the situation as the ticket gives permission? --Krd 06:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Please, check Template:Mariia Kuzovleva Permission. Dinamik (talk) 06:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Very good, thank you! Please now use it as {{Mariia Kuzovleva Permission}} instead of {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Please do so only for the file the permission applies to. --Krd 06:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
ich habe verstanden, vielen Dank! Dinamik (talk) 06:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

ticket:2020041210003081

Hello, Krd. I noticed that you have processed ticket #2020041210003081, and that it applies to these four works of art. Does that same ticket apply to any of the art listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Art by Gil Marco Shani? Vycl1994 (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

No, the ticket explicitly mentions the four files. --Krd 19:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Understood, thanks for your work. I've contacted the uploader to see if the other artworks will be freely licensed. Vycl1994 (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion File

hi Mr. Krd, I am writing to you, because I noticed that yesterday you have eliminated a myriad of files uploaded by this User. the files you have deleted are of F1 mode. I have personally analyzed many of these files, and I must CONFIRM them that many of these files contain their original origin and their information, you have acted in an elimination by eyes, but the mistake is that many of them were in good faith of copyright licensing information. I just want to ask you what are you going to do with those files ?? but one thing is for sure, those files must not be absolutely deleted, because many different links lead to exact information on the nature of the file

(I await your reply). thanks --37.182.21.98 18:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Task 2

Hello!

When deletion requests are deleted. Can you make the bot remove them from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/4?Jonteemil (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I think it already does. Please provide a link where that went wrong. --Krd 08:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Oh, that's good. It didn't go wrong anywhere. Just my impatience I guess :). How often does the bot check for deleted DRs?Jonteemil (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The bot currently archives requests every 15 minutes, but only if 10 or more requests have been closed since the last run. --Krd 08:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I wasn't wrong. See in Special:Diff/412822345 the bot should remove the DRs completely instead of archiving them.Jonteemil (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
You are right, and I now changed it accordingly. Please let me know if it works. --Krd 10:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I'll wait until any DRs are deleted again and I will let you know if it works then.Jonteemil (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello again!

Now there has been a deletion of a DR. See Special:Diff/414109441. The removal works fine but the edit summary should be changed.Jonteemil (talk) 15:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Very good. Will look into the summaries later. --Krd 15:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay - Jonteemil (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Request for a ruling and a procedure Make Commons safe for GLAMs

Dear Krd,

In March 2020 you suggested i send a report of my problems with OTRS and the (lacking) protection of GLAM donations to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Finally, i have just done so. The subject of the email is: "Request ruling/procedure Making Commons safe", from "j.m.muller". A pdf-report "Making Commons safe for GLAMs, by User Hansmuller - 052020.pdf" is attached.

I hope that email is not drowned out among the probably very many mails in that mailbox, so i just mention it here to be safe.

I hope you and/or your colleagues etcetera will consider that report and act on it, to make Wikimedia Commons safe for GLAM donations.

Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 08:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

My email request just got the [Ticket#2020050910002792] . Enjoy our star, Hansmuller (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Noted. Thank you. --Krd 12:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Yet another possible sockpuppet of Lý Ngọc Đạt

Lee Gok Da (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

I am writing to you because you probably know the case better as you are the person who once blocked the master. This edit is particularly interesting. --jdx Re: 09:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

EDIT: Also 通りすがりの猛者 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  --jdx Re: 09:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Checkuser data is inconclusive, so we can block on behavior only. --Krd 09:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

User Problem - user:Chris die Seele - user:Gliwi

Moin aus Röttgersbach - leider wurde dieser Hilferuf, ohne dass ein Admin aktiv wurde, schon kommentarlos archiviert. Was haben wir falsch gemacht? Wie kann die Sache wieder aktiviert werden? -  MaxxL - talk 12:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC) PS: Heute ist mal wieder Gliwi aktiv - Chris steht seit dem 6. Mai still. -  MaxxL - talk 12:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich habe von der Materie leider keine Ahnung, daher kann ich nicht helfen. Das user problem kann man aber sicher einfach nochmal so stellen, vielleicht klappt es ja dieses mal. --Krd 12:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Löschanträge in österreichischen Kirchen

Hallo Krd, der User:Martin Sg. stellt in den letzten Tagen laufend LA für Innenansichten von Kirchen. Ich glaube nicht, dass ich da mit einer FOP falsch liege, auch wenn die Künstler keien 70 Jahre tot sind. lg K@rl (talk)

Hallo Karl, bitte gib nähere Hinweise. --Krd 06:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Z.Bsp. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Rudolf Millonig --K@rl (talk) 07:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Bei allem Respekt, "ich habe dir schon einmal erklärt, dass du scheinbar keine Ahnung … hast" geht so gar nicht. --Krd 07:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
ICh versteh dich, aber unabhängig davon , hat er recht oder nicht? - Wenn nicht, will ich eine Kindermesse nicht x-mal lesen. Ansonsten entschuldige ich mich --lg K@rl (talk) 13:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Ich denke, er hat unrecht, FOP gilt hier. Und wenn man das im Löschantrag sachlich vorträgt, wird es sicher in der Entscheidung berücksichtigt und die Bilder werden behalten. Ein Löschantrag an sich ist nicht ehrenrührig, der Antragsteller hat sicher nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen im Sinne des freien Wissens gehandelt. --Krd 13:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay, danke, das bestätigt mich wenigstens. Ich werde aber nicht mehr an der letzten Disk von einigen schon teilnehmen, denn... --K@rl (talk) 18:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Please enable the image in Wikimedia Commons

hu:Szerkesztő:SiposBéla1945

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MarkosfalviSipos.jpg Angolul kérés Sipos címer engedélyezése |source=Sipos Béla (1875-1967) |author=Sipos Béla (1875-1967) It was drawn by my grandfather around 1930. It was given to me exclusively in 1961 --SiposBéla1945 (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Ticket is in Hungarian, which I cannot read. --Krd 13:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


Hi Krd, nur zur Info, weil der Beschwerdeführer die Benachrichtigung unterlassen hat: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Suppressions_abusives_de_la_part_d'un_utilisateur. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

My sig

Is this better? --Ìch heiss Nat. 08:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Definitely. --Krd 08:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

«Gewerbliche Nutzung»

Lieber Krd

Ich habe ja schon manches Bild an die Commons abgetreten oder die Abtretung vermittelt. Nun aber mailt mir eine Urheberin, die ich kürzlich darum gebeten habe, das Folgende: «Die Bedingungen, die damit [der Freigabe] verbunden sind, sind doch etwas befremdlich, u. a.: Punkt 1 "Mir ist bekannt, dass damit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritte das Recht haben, das Bild zu nutzen und zu verändern. Dies schließt auch eine gewerbliche Nutzung ein."»

Hm – hast du eine gute Idee, wie ich sie beruhigen kann? Ich finde auch, dass der Text «befremdlich» tönt, habe allerdings noch nie mitbekommen, dass da etwas Irritierendes passiert wäre. Habe selber jedenfalls keine Bedenken, eigenen Bilder hochzuladen. Nun würde ich gerne auch die Bedenken der Urheberin zerstreuen ...

Vielen Dank für eine argumentative Unterstützung! :-) --Freigut (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Ich verweise immer auf Commons:Licensing/Justifications. --Krd 10:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Tiptop, danke! --Freigut (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Bitte um Hilfe

Hallo Krd, ich bin erstmals von einer Löschorgie überrascht worden, die viele von mir mühsam gesammelte Objekte betrifft. Im Wesentlichen wohl mit der Begründung, dass sie nicht wichtig genug oder relevant sind. Einige davon kann man wahrscheinlich bei strenger Auslegung des Urheberrechts beanstanden.

Ein großer Teil betrifft die Aufnahmen von textilen Einnähetiketten für Bekleidung. Commons kennt dafür die Genehmigung "textlogo", die darauf hinweist, dass ein Firmenschriftzug eventuell trotz urheberrechtsfreiem Foto geschützt ist. In etlichen Wikipediaartikeln über Unternehmen finden diese Abbildungen Verwendung. Meine Einwände fanden leider keinerlei Beachtung. Was kann ich tun, mein Frust ist erheblich? Kannst du mir helfen?

Siehe: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_K%C3%BCrschner

Danke -- Kürschner (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Kürschner. Über die Logos an sich könnte man diskutieren, hier handelt es sich aber, soweit ich verstehe, in erster Linie um Fotos, und für die Fotos ist erstmal die Genehmigung durch den Fotografen erforderlich. Erst danach wird geschaut, ob in den Fotos evtl. etwas geschütztes abgebildet ist. --Krd 09:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Die Fotos sind doch von mir, mit Freigabe? -- Kürschner (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
In dem Löschantrag steht etwas anderes: "uploader has taken photographs from internet sites". Wenn Die Fotos von Dir sind, hätten wir am liebsten eine Freigabe von Dir für das Foto, und wen es geht eine Bestätigung durch den Logoinhaber, dass das Foto mit dem Logo so unter der CC-Lizenz veröffentlicht werden darf. --Krd 09:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Ah ja, sorry. An die Etiketten aus Ebay habe ich nicht gedacht, ich kann sie ja nicht mehr sehen. Und die sollen wirklich als urheberrechtsgeschützte Fotos von dreidimensionalen Werken gewertet werden? Ohje.
Ein anderes Problem stellen die Zeitungsausschnitte dar, die aus meiner Sicht nur Sachinformationen (Aufzählungen von Preisträgern) als Zitate enthalten, die ich als Quellenangaben für Wikipedia verwendet und verlinkt habe. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Auf Quellen braucht nur verwiesen zu werden, sie müssen nicht kopiert werden. --Krd 09:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Schon klar, sie dienten aber auch zur Vervollständigung hier (außerdem stehen sie mir und anderen jetzt nicht mehr als Quelle zur Verfügung) : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Leistungswettbewerb_des_K%C3%BCrschnerhandwerks --Kürschner (talk) 09:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Zeitungsausschnitte sind immer problematisch, entweder sind Bilder drin, oder Text. Auch Text ist geschützt. Ich denke, auch die Textdokumente in der genannten Kategorie gehen so nicht, dafür ist eine Freigabe nötig. --Krd 09:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Könnte mir bitte jemand alles noch einmal kurz herstellen, damit ich es mir abspeichern kann? Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 10:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Ich hoffe das hat einen Moment Zeit, ich schicke Dir die Sachen so schnell wie möglich per Mail. Evtl. wird es nächste Woche. --Krd 16:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
@Kürschner: Die Sache stellt sich leider als nicht so einfach dar, per API-Call scheint es nicht zu gehen, d.h. man müsste sie wirklich kurz wiederherstellen. Bitte gib mir noch etwas Zeit. --Krd 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Danke Krd, eilt ja nicht. -- Kürschner (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Siehe E-mail. --Krd 07:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Die drei Fragezeichen - Hörspielkassetten.jpg

Hallo Krd, da mich diese Freigabe etwas wundert (siehe meinen neuesten Kommentar hier), da die Rechteinhaber ja damit den Weg für jedermann bahnen, diese Cover selber kommerziell zu nutzen, eine Nachfrage: Von welchen Rechteinhabern genau kam die OTRS-Genehmigung, haben sie sie (wie es m.W. vorgesehen ist) selber an das OTRS geschickt (also nicht einfach der Uploader mit einer Behauptung), und worauf genau erstreckt sich die Freigabe (nur die in diesem Foto abgebildeten Cover, alle Cover von Aiga Rasch...?) Gestumblindi (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Gestumblindi. Ich sehe ein, dass es hier Fragen geben könnte, aber ich kann sie nicht alle beantworten, das der Inhalt der Tickets grundsätzlich vertraulich ist. Ich schlage vor, Du bittest einen anderen OTRS-Mitarbeiter die Freigabe gegenzuprüfen. Ich bin damit einverstanden. --Krd 09:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, also soviel ich weiss, gilt zumindest der Umfang der Tickets allgemein nicht als vertraulich und diese Auskunft wird von OTRS-Mitarbeitern normalerweise gegeben, also worauf sich das Ticket genau erstreckt. Könntest du das schon mal sagen? Und ob die Freigabe wirklich direkt von den Rechteinhabern an das OTRS geschickt wurde, darfst du wohl auch mitteilen? Gestumblindi (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Was genau gefällt Dir an meinem Vorschlag nicht, diese offenbar umstrittene Ticket von einem bisher unbeteiligten Kollegen gegenprüfen zu lassen? Ich kann auch jemanden darum bitten, würde Dir aber gern die Wahl lassen, wer sich das nochmal anschauen soll. --Krd 09:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Natürlich habe ich nichts dagegen, so vorzugehen, aber natürlich wäre es evtl. nicht nötig gewesen, wenn du mir schon Auskünfte hättest geben können, die meine Bedenken entkräften. Das klingt nun ein bisschen so, als würdest du deiner eigenen Einschätzung nicht wirklich trauen. Du könntest dann natürlich auch selber zum Schluss kommen, das Ticket falsch abgearbeitet zu haben (falls es so sein sollte) und deine Entscheidung rückgängig machen. Nunja - vor heute Abend komme ich nicht mehr dazu, werde das dann angehen. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Sehr gut, danke. --Krd 09:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I would like two posters to be approved

Excuse me,I would like two posters I uploaded such as Highlander: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Highlander86.jpg and God told me to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:God_told_me_poster.jpg to be approved because it's complicated to approve the posters and I was asking for your permission to let them be approved so that they won't be deleted and is there an easy solution to let them be approved and avoid them from being deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belrien12 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Also my ticket number is 2020051710000644--Belrien12 (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please let the permission sender react to the followup questions they got. --Krd 16:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

How will I do that? Also, it's a bit hard to follow--Belrien12 (talk) 02:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

I have reminded them now. If nothing happens, there is nothing we can do. --Krd 06:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Krd, ich häng mich hier mal ran: Der Nutzer hat auch File:Wizard of oz poster.jpg hochgeladen, das Du als Copyvio gelöscht hat. In COM:HD hat aber Asclepias darauf hingewiesen (vgl. Special:Diff/420388428/420397438), dass dieses Poster bereits seit 2008 in Commons zu sehen ist, siehe Wizard of oz movie poster.jpg, und dass es sogar einen abschlägig beschiedenen Löschantrag darauf gab: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wizard of oz movie poster.jpg. Im Ergebnis mag die Löschung richtig sein, da die von Belrien12 wohl als Duplikat gelten müsste, aber der angegebene Löschgrund ist damit falsch. Ich weiß nicht, wie wichtig das potentiell sei kann, wollte dir die Info aber zukommen lassen, damit Du selbst entscheiden kannst. — Speravir – 22:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Request about conflict resolution and GLAM?

Dear Krd,

At your suggestion i sent a request about conflict resolution and GLAM. On May 9, 2020 it got the ticketnumber [Ticket#2020050910002792] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Request ruling/proce [...]). I hope you, or someone else, can answer. Thanks! Hansmuller (talk) 04:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

This is discussed between uninvolved OTRS admins. I think you will get an answer in the next few days. --Krd 06:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Bot policy question

Hi Krd. I hope you are well. I have a question about the bot approval policy: is approval required if the edits are only in the bot's or botop's own userspace? I feel like it is, but the policy doesn't say it, and I'm probably getting it confused with enwiki's bot policy exemption. Thanks, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I think it very much depends on the amount of edit. While for few edits it maybe sufficient to set the bot autopatrolled, a bot flag may better a many edits are made. I cannot specify exact numbers; when in doubt I think it won‘t hurt to write a bot flag request. --Krd 18:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
The bot is already flagged, so that's not a concern. I'll write a request anyways, worst case, it gets approved quickly :). Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
If the bot is already flagged, you are cleared to make own user space edits at your discretion. No request required. --Krd 13:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
OK, great (I already did Commons:Bots/Requests/MDanielsBot 4, so I guess that should just be closed at some point). By the way, what happened to my request for permissions (commons & en) and photosubmission access at otrswiki:Administrator requests a while back? You removed it at otrswiki:Special:Diff/99219/99222 (the middle one shown there), but I didn't notice any change or declination. Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Ticket:2020051210007567

Could you take care of this ticket? I requested the photo from his son, so I would like to avoid processing the ticket myself. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 05:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Ticket:2019112010004116

File:Clarissa Rios Rojas at the World Science Forum 2019.jpg is of a person along side a substantial banner. Are you able to determine (and comment:) whether the ticket covers the banner as well as the whole photograph, or if instead it only covers the photograph (leaving unresolved whether there is a license release for the banner)? Based on a spot-check of this user's uploads, I have a bunch of FoP concerns. DMacks (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

The copyright holder of the banner agreed to have the photo published under that license. --Krd 05:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for double-checking! DMacks (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Requesting OTRS Review

Dear sir, Please review these files:

Review in which aspect? --Krd 12:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
want to put {{PermissionOTRS|id=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX}} template. দিব্য দত্ত (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Please be patient, this will happen when the tickets are processed. --Krd 14:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Review

Thank you for reviewing uploaded files. I'd highly appreciate if you could review my latest uploads due to RBC.ua recently allowed to use all of its' photos under CC 4.0 license (as it's mentioned in bottom part of all pages on their website). Thank you. --Goo3 (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Please put {{LicenseReview}} into the file pages. --Krd 17:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Warum werden Weiterleitung in Wikimedia Commons anders behandelt als in der Wikipedia (hier manuelle Weiterleitung dort automatische Weiterleitung)

Hallo Krd, hallo Achim55, warum werden Weiterleitung in Wikimedia Commons anders behandelt als in der Wikipedia (hier manuelle Weiterleitung dort automatische Weiterleitung)

Ich habe mir diese Frage schon öfter gestellt und würde mir auch für Commons die automatische Weiterleitung wünschen. (Wie in der Wikipedia könnte man ja jederzeit zur "Weiterleitung" zurück finden, wenn man dies denn wollte. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Eine gute Frage. Ich vermute, weil Kategorien besondere Eigenschaften haben und es daher nicht anders möglich oder sinnvoll ist. Erklären kann ich es leider nicht. --Krd 06:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Danke für Deine Rückmeldung: Ich habe es mal hier versucht. --Molgreen (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Moin und bitte um Deine Meinung

Moin Krd, ich bitte Dich folgendes zu beurteilen. [3] Wir haben diese Category, erst mal ok. Darin findet sich, vermutlich von einem Mitarbeiter der Firma angelegt, die Unterkat [4] „Solarschiff Orca ten Broke - www.seminarschiff.com - am Liegeplatz Focus Teleport Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit“ mit der Adresse der Webseite des Unternehmens. Ebenso sind alle Bilder beschriftet mit der Webseite im Namen. Ein büschen Werbung ist ja ok und wird sich nicht vermeiden lassen, aber in einer Kat und im Dateinamen finde ich das etwas übertrieben. Deine Meinung und wie sind da so die üblichen Regeln? Ich meine das sollte geändert werden. Danke und Grüße -- Biberbaer (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich denke auch dass das geändert werden sollte. --Krd 06:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Moin und danke für die schnelle Antwort. Gruß -- Biberbaer (talk) 06:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, hallo Biberbaer, Entschuldigung, es tut mir leid, dass ich Euch durch meine Unbedarftheit so viel Aufwand beschert habe. So etwas soll nicht wieder vorkommen. --Molgreen (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Nachtrag: die Erneuerbaren Energien sind "mein" Thema. Nur deshalb habe ich diese Solarschiff fotografiert und da in der Wikipedia Verlinkungen zu den jeweiligen Homepages im Abschnitt Weblinks aus meiner Sicht Standard sind, habe ich hier kein Problem gesehen... (Ich glaube nicht, dass ich diese Aktion vergessen werde...) --Molgreen (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Ich hab die Sache nicht verfolgt und nun leider keine Ahnung, ob und was hier schiefgegangen ist. Gibt es noch ein Problem, das zu lösen ist? --Krd 17:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Nein, aus meiner Sicht läuft der Prozess seinen üblichen Gang.--Molgreen (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Open bot requests

Hi! There are some open requests at Commons:Bots/Requests that I hope can be closed soon because I think they will be very helpful. If you have time could you check and if anything is missing perhaps make a note what is needed before the task can be approved? --MGA73 (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

As soon as there is a free minute. --Krd 09:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Google Art Project

hi krd I ask you to restore immediately the following portraits deleted by you, because the information containing for the description of files was openly part of google art project, so are data that confirm their good faith in the expiration of copyright, PLEASE?

--37.182.21.128 11:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

YouTube License

Hallo Krd, ich hatte ein Problem beim Überprüfen der Lizenz der Datei Anuel AA Corona Virus.png. Das Problem ist, dass das Video zwar unter einer Creative-Commons-Lizenz veröffentlich wurde, die Videobeschreibung jedoch besagt, dass es Urheberrechtlich geschützt ist (© 2020 Real Hasta La Muerte). Bin zum ersten Mal auf so etwas gestoßen und weiß daher leider nicht genau, was ich tun soll. Ich möchte deshalb sie um Ihre hilfe bitten. Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn Sie mir weiterhelfen können.

Mfg --阿 talk 20:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Urheberrechtlich geschützt ist es auch, wenn es unter CC-Lizenz steht, das © ist also kein Wiederspruch. Die Frage ist, ob es durch den tatsächlichen Rechteinhaber auf Youtube hochgeladen wurde, oder durch einen Dritten, der evtl. falsche Angaben gemacht hat. Das kann ich hier aber auch nicht beantworten. --Krd 06:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

reloading files

hi krd, I noticed that you recently deleted some files related to some users that you considered abusers, well, I am therefore to tell you right away that it is my intention to reload some of their files that you have recently deleted on sight, because many of them were in license compatible with the expiration of the copyright, fiorse she receives sepia notifications concerning the restoration of these files, but I take this opportunity to tell her directly, not to see any bad surprises. I conclude the speech by repeating them I fully intend to restore some PD license files that you have ELIMINATED ON SIGHT --Ałfred Moltke (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

reloading files

hi krd, I noticed that you recently deleted some files related to some users that you considered abusers, well, I am therefore to tell you right away that it is my intention to reload some of their files that you have recently deleted on sight, because many of them were in license compatible with the expiration of the copyright, fiorse she receives sepia notifications concerning the restoration of these files, but I take this opportunity to tell her directly, not to see any bad surprises. I conclude the speech by repeating them I fully intend to restore some PD license files that you have ELIMINATED ON SIGHT. to communicate I want to report that I fully intend to restore all the files that have been deleted by you on the user Bernhard Moltke, because I noticed that you have deleted some files over and over again, it is I intend to check their nature, I know that maybe when I reload them you will find a notification (being an administrator) where you announce that a file that you have deleted has been restored, but I want to see it clearly. if you have any doubts on some files, PLEASE CONTACT LIKE ME IN MY TALK. however I tell you right away, I fully intend to restore all those files and if it serves to change their status if due to some excess the information contained in the description file, should not meet the criteria of the copyright licenses.

well, then I will start the reloading process, if you have something to say let me know as soon as possible, because it is very likely that when I recycle them you will certainly know it, which is why I ask you to contact me in talk that c is this file that does not convince it --Ałfred Moltke (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Log

désolé mr krd, je vous écris pour vous dire que je me suis permis de réorganiser un fichier que vous avez précédemment supprimé. mais j'ai vu la description de la source à laquelle le File était connecté et j'ai trouvé que les informations de la source sont fidèles aux informations rapportées dans le journal de l'utilisateur qui a précédemment téléchargé le fichier. Personnellement, je ne comprends pas pourquoi elle l'a supprimé, personnellement, cela n'a aucun sens de supprimer un fichier correct, simplement parce qu'un abuseur l'a téléchargé. quel sens cette chose peut-elle faire si les informations du fichier sont correctes ???? cependant j'ai pris la liberté de le recharger, j'espère que non si je le prends, car il y a beaucoup de ce genre de fichiers, je dis licence PD, je voulais juste vous informer car beaucoup de ces fichiers ont été supprimés par vous, et je voulais vous informer personnellement--Francois Villneuve (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Dr Christine Bortenlaenger.jpg

File:Dr Christine Bortenlaenger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bahnmoeller (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Infinite IP blocks?

Hi. Noticed that you have some infinite IP blocks. Was this purposeful or just artefact of actions?  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I have now removed them, and some more. Thank you! --Krd 05:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Orleansplatz - Orléansplatz

Hallo Krd, es geht nicht darum, wie man die Stadt Orléans richtig schreibt, sondern wie man eine Münchner Straße richtig schreibt, nämlich so, wie der Name amtlich festgelegt ist. Schau bitte mal z.B. hier nach. Machst du bitte deine Änderungen wieder selbst rückgängig?! Gruß --Rufus46 (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Ja, schon klar, und nun erledigt. --Krd 13:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hot Breast implants.jpg

Hello!

How can this file be ”deleted per nomination” when there isn't a reason stated in the nominations at all?Jonteemil (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

The file itself was deleted by "Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7)", in combination with personality rights concerns. --Krd 07:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

deleted page Category:Pubs in Dublin (city)

Why did you delete this category? A request for a full discussion was created and placed on the category page. A request to deny speedy was made. Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The category is empty, isn't it? --Krd 12:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The reason for the request to deny speedy was because the category was improperly blanked out of process by the requester. I wanted a full discussion on how best to handle it. Did you not see the templates for full discussion? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Up to my understanding the category can be restored if it will be populated again. It does not make much sense to restore an empty category page. --Krd 14:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
That is also my understanding. My question, however, remains unanswered: Did you not see the templates for full discussion? Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
That is correct in this case, I did not see that. --Krd 17:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Ich versteh es nicht

Dein Speedy deletion auf 100px. Da greift doch die Panoramafreiheit in Deutschland. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Wir brauchen die Freigabe durch den Fotografen, der hier nicht der Hochlader ist. --Krd 12:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Danke, das hatte ich nicht gesehen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Nightflyer (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Rob Locke.jpg

Hallo Krd, kannst Du mir sagen, ob das ein Fall für OTRS oder speedy deletion ist? Adelfrank (talk) 14:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich denke das kann man so per OTRS seinen Gang gehen lassen. --Krd 14:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Aha, dachte ist 14 Tage her. Aber dann lasse ich ihn auf meiner BEO. Danke. Adelfrank (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Die Frist dafür ist vermutlich 30 Tage. Passt aber. --Krd 14:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Request for translation admin

Hi, I'd like to request temporary translation administrator rights. Could you do me a favor?--KOKUYO (talk) 02:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Have you read the policy on translation administrators? --Krd 06:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh.....I'm sorry that I forget "The request should remain open for at least two days...."--KOKUYO (talk) 06:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

deleted files

hi mr krd, I am writing to you, because you recently deleted this large list of files from sight.

here I want to tell you that many of these files were well-informed and well informed about the correct insertion of licenses for the copyright expiration. I want to know from her why she deleted them? there have been no copyright problems in those files, otherwise she would have rightly warned me about the license to change. then why????? could you give me an answer? please??--37.183.21.173 15:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Sock puppetry again

User:Franz von Pawłew is back at User:Dcwillett. Celia Homeford (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

no it's not him I confirm, given that Franz von Pawłew in his uploads entered his COMPILATION data WELL WHEN he uploaded his files, honestly me not if Krd had blocked it because it was a sock and for the files it uploaded ?? no because if it were for the files, we should question this thing! absolutely !!! .. however he has nothing to do with how that other user operates.--37.183.21.173 19:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

inkonsistente Urheberangabe

Moin Krd, bei File:Robitschko.jpg und File:Robitschko (cropped).jpg ist im Urheberfeld der Name des Hochladers, PatMic, angegeben, obwohl der Urheber laut Beschreibung und Metadaten "stefanleitner.com" ist, die gem. File:Pater Josef Wagner OSB.jpg nicht dieselbe Person sind. Bevor ich diese Inkonsistenz selbst beseitige, wüsste ich gerne, ob das nur eine Unachtsamkeit ist oder eine ausdrückliche Vorgabe im OTRS-Ticket war. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio. Das Ticket lässt offen, welche Namensnennung Fotograf und Rechteinhaber wünschen. Man kann es so lassen, oder man kann es ändern. --Krd 08:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Danke. Habs jetzt mal bei beiden angepasst. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Albino 2019.jpg

Hi! As I explained in the edit summary, permission can be seen on the link in the Source section; the file is in the public domain, transferred from Flickr, just like many other pictures. What should I add more? --Miljan Simonović (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

The Flickr public domain mark is for cases where the copyright has expired or the file is ineligible for copyright. Both is not the case here, so this cannot be used as reference. Please send permission via OTRS. --Krd 08:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete file talk page

Hi Krd, could you please undelete File talk:Pind-Meglen.png? The file has been undeleted. —Granger (talk  · contribs) 15:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 15:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Redeletion and reundeletion

Hi, Could you please undo the deletion of these talk pages? Like their logs show, they had just been restored when you deleted them again.

-- Asclepias (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 07:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

OTRS permissions for Images from Khalili Collections partnership

Hello Krd, sorry for bothering you but I'm asking in case you can help with a problem. I'm a Wikimedian In Residence and have been uploading batches of images from my cultural partner organisation, who send in OTRS permission tickets, and you have kindly implemented some of these permissions. It mostly works fine, but with three batches where the permissions email was sent in during November, the permissions haven't been processed. Two batches already have been deleted. The emails will have come from an @nourhouse.com address: one had images of the form Khalili Collection of Swedish Textiles SW029.jpg; in another, the file names all had "Japanese_Meiji_Art" e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khalili_Collection_Japanese_Meiji_Art_BL039.jpg and in the third the file names all contained "Spanish Damascened Metalwork" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khalili_Collection_Spanish_Damascened_Metalwork_ZUL135.jpg . If you can take a look, I'd be grateful for any insight on what happened to these tickets and if there's anything more I can do at my end to get the permissions approved. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

I have seen some tickets related to that which just came in today. Please be patient. --Krd 14:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Deleted TP

Hi. I think you must revive File talk:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg so that the DR-kept may be seen. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 16:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 08:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

OTRS 2FA

Hi, I have lost the authentication device which had keys for both ticket.wikimedia.org and OTRS-wiki. Please let me know the procedure to temporarily disable or any other way that I can login temporarily and create new keys. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 14:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

I have no clue. --Krd 14:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done in meantime. --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Ticket:2020071810002477

Kindly direct your attention to COM:ON#File:ISG S7Wer 00260-0002 Frauen demonstrieren in der Frankfurter Innenstadt gegen den Paragraph 218.jpg and two more photographs.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Also COM:ON#Company logo and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ももくまのうち.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

dodis.ch/P112

Hallo Krd

Ich würde gerne die in Dodis – Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland 1848–1975 verwendete Photo in meinen Wikipedia-Artikel über de:Carl Stucki einstellen. Da ich ohnehin mit Dodis im Kontakt stand, fragte ich auch gleich, ob sie einverstanden wären, die Photo unter die Lizenz CC BY-SA 4.0 zu stellen, damit ich sie in den Wikipediaartikel einfügen könne, worauf die folgende Antwort kam: «Die Porträtbilder dürfen Sie gerne unter Angabe der Quelle bei Dodis verwenden (Diplomatische Dokumente der Schweiz, Online-Datenbank Dodis: dodis.ch/P112).» Frage: Reicht diese Zustimmung für Wikimedia Commons? (Den vollständigen Mailverkehr kann ich gerne nachliefern.)

Beste Grüsse, --Freigut (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Ich frage mich, ob die wirklich die Rechte an den Bildern haben. So richtig plausibel erscheint mir das nicht. Wenn die Behauptung aber stimmt, dann kann das einfach so nach Commons kopiert werden. --Krd 14:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Ich habe mich auch gefragt, ob sie die Rechte wirklich haben. Aber ich bezweifle, dass ein Nachfragen zu einem sicheren Ergebnis führt ... Anderseits scheint es sich um eine simple Personalfoto zu handeln, ohne jeden künstlerischen Wert – aber ob das ein Argument ist, weiss ich nicht. Kann man sich allenfalls einfach darauf abstellen, das Dodis der Meinung ist, die Rechte zu haben? Wenn sie das behaupten, kann es nicht unsere Aufgabe sein, das zu verifzieren. Was meinst du? --Freigut (talk) 14:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Ich denke wir sollten da nachfragen. Ich kann mir das ansehen, aber das wird ein paar Tage dauern. --Krd 05:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Danke. --Freigut (talk) 11:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Äh – du setzest den Erledigt-Baustein – ist das denn jetzt erledigt? Ich dachte, du wolltest dir das ansehen? Oder kann ich das Bild jetzt hochladen, mit Beifügung des Mails von Dodis, dass sie damit einverstanden seien (siehe oben)? --Freigut (talk) 16:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Äh, sorry, das war wohl ein Irrtum. Ja, das steht leider noch aus. --Krd 16:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Lieber Krd, sehe gerade, dass auch in den Artikel Flavio Cotti eine Dodis-Foto eingefügt worden ist. Zur Lizenzierung siehe hier. Insofern sollte der Verwendung der Dodis-Foto von Carl Stucki somit auch nichts im Wege stehen. Lieber Gruss, --Freigut (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Habe die Foto nun hochgeladen und publiziert. LG, --Freigut (talk) 09:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Bitte gib mir nochmal einen Hinweis oder Link, was genau zu tun ist. --Krd 13:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Siehe oben – ich fragte nach, ob dieses Bild publiziert werden dürfe, und du wolltest dem nachgehen. Nachdem nun ein anderes aus Dodis anstandslos publiziert worden ist, steht auch «meinem» Bild nichts mehr entgegen – die Sache hat sich also erledigt. Einen guten Rutsch ins 2021 wünscht --Freigut (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Ich bin nicht dvon überzeugt, dass hier eine Klärung stattgefunden hat oder das so in Ordnung ist, aber ich komme auf absehbare Zeit auch nicht dazu, mich darum zu kümmern. --Krd 14:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Trotz Impressum, wonach «die Inhalte von Dodis – Diplomatische Dokumente der Schweiz [...] lizenziert [sind] unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz»? Dann ist es eigentlich die Sache von Dodis, sich um die Details zu kümmern, und nicht von Wikimedia Commons – die sind meines Erachtens fein raus. Aber wie auch immer, ich bin da kein Spezialist. --Freigut (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Die Frage ist, ob es sich dabei um Inhalte handelt, an denen Dodis Rechteinhaber ist. Wenn es sich einfach um eine falsche Behauptung handelt, z.b. um einen Irrtum, dann ist das schon teilweise "unser" Problem, weil wir als Commons den Weiternutzer dazu ermunter, das Bild zu nutzen. Aber vielleicht hast Du recht damit, dass es ein Problem ist, das wir aus Zeitmangel nicht lösen werden. --Krd 15:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krd/archive/2020&oldid=865976959"