User talk:Knut
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Photo Identification
[edit]Kurt. Media should have a summary to inform others of the content, author, source, and date if possible. If you know or have access to such information, please add it to the image page. --HTPF 18:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Is this ok? Knut 18:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, forgot it. I'll hope it OK now. -Knut 19:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
File:Scrabblebrett.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— raeky (talk | edits) 06:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Could anyone tell me why the file was deleted?
- May I have a copy of my deleted file? --Knut (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Heisann, sidan eg ikkje har administratorknappar her lengre kan eg ikkje grava fram ei kopi, men det kan sikkert td Kjetil r gjere. Ellers ser eg ikkje bort i frå at du kan finne ei erstatting i Category:Scrabble. Fila var sletta etter ei kort sletteprosess Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Scrabblebrett.JPG, som igjen viser til denne Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scrabble board in play.jpg. Sålenge eg ikkje lenger kan se dei sletta filene vert ikkje eg så mykje klokare av det... Mvh Finn Rindahl (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Dersom eg får tak i fila, kan eg laste ho opp lokalt. Men dersom grunngjevinga er slik at fila heller ikkje kan lastast opp i Norge, så går ikkje det. Før eg evt lagar ei ny fil med norske ord på scrabble-brettet, skulle eg gjerne visst korfor den førre fila vart seltta. Spå eg ikkje risikerer at det same skjer på nytt. --Knut (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Heisann, sidan eg ikkje har administratorknappar her lengre kan eg ikkje grava fram ei kopi, men det kan sikkert td Kjetil r gjere. Ellers ser eg ikkje bort i frå at du kan finne ei erstatting i Category:Scrabble. Fila var sletta etter ei kort sletteprosess Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Scrabblebrett.JPG, som igjen viser til denne Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scrabble board in play.jpg. Sålenge eg ikkje lenger kan se dei sletta filene vert ikkje eg så mykje klokare av det... Mvh Finn Rindahl (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Selve bildefilen har jeg nå lagt her.
Begrunnelsen for å slette bildet var at det var det som på engelsk kalles et «derivative work», eller «avledet verk» på norsk. Tankegangen er at spillbrettet er beskyttet av opphavsrett, og at du eller andre dermed ikke kan publisere et fotografi av det uten å få tillatelse av de som eier rettighetene til spillet. Slike bilder av spillebrett o.l. blir jevnlig slettet på Commons. Håper dette var en forståelig forklaring. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 21:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Scrabble board is copyrighted, so a photograph of it is a Derivative Work and not permitted here. See also Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Grei forklaring - OK explaination. Eit utsnitt av ein spelsituasjon vil kanskje vere OK? A minor part og a playboard is possibly OK? --Knut (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Forgive me if I do not understand the question -- but, yes, a minor part of the board, or where it is not the main subject of the photo, would be OK. See File:Playing-risk-venezuela.JPG or File:Childs Monopoly.jpg for example. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- You got the question right Jim ;) File:Flickr_Love.jpg is perhaps a better example of something that would be permitted - if you make something Knut similar with "Wikipedia" in Nynorsk that ought to be a good illustration for nnwiki. Beste helsing, Finn Rindahl (talk) 10:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Forgive me if I do not understand the question -- but, yes, a minor part of the board, or where it is not the main subject of the photo, would be OK. See File:Playing-risk-venezuela.JPG or File:Childs Monopoly.jpg for example. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Finn. Yes, File:Flickr_Love.jpg is also a good example. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will make a try "når nettene blir lange". --Knut (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Knut. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Knut~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Arvidsjaurklave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |