User talk:Tomasz Wachowski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Klondek)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Klondek!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 13:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Informacja o pliku Image:Tomasz Wachowski.jpg

[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Znak ostrzeżenia
Ten plik może zostać usunięty.

Witaj, Tomasz Wachowski! Dziękuję, że wysłałeś(-aś) plik Image:Tomasz Wachowski.jpg. Zauważyłem jednak, że strona opisu tego pliku nie zawiera informacji o tym, kto ten plik stworzył, więc jego status prawny nie jest znany. Jeżeli nie stworzyłeś(-aś) tego pliku sam, to musisz udowodnić, że mamy prawo do użycia go na Wikimedia Commons (zobacz oznaczanie licencji grafik poniżej). Jeśli nie stworzyłeś(-aś) tego pliku sam to musisz także podać źródło, skąd ten plik masz (zwykle wystarczy podać link do strony, z której masz ten plik oraz link do strony opisującej możliwości używania zawartości strony).

Jeśli plik nie zawiera oznaczenia licencji odpowiednim szablonem, to je także musisz dodać. Jeżeli stworzyłeś(-aś)/zrobiłeś(-aś) ten obrazek, plik dźwiękowy lub wideo, to możesz użyć szablonu {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, aby udostępnić ten plik na licencji Creative Commons lub {{PD-self}}, aby oznaczy go jako własność publiczną. Zobacz Commons:Oznaczenia licencji, aby uzyskać pełniejsze informacje i szerszą listę szablonów używanych przy oznaczaniu grafik (czy ogólniej plików).

Zauważ, że pliki nieoznaczone szablonami, jak również bez podanych źródeł zostaną usunięte po tygodniu od ich przesłania, tak jak opisano to na stronie: kryteria usuwania. Jeżeli wysłałeś(-aś) również inne pliki, sprawdź ich pochodzenie i dodaj odpowiednie licencje. Wszystkie wysłane przez siebie pliki znajdziesz na stronie narzędzia Galerii. Dziękuję. A.J. 15:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli ani autor, ani źródło (czyli gdzie zdjęcie zostało opublikowane) jest nieznane, to nie można zdjęcia zamieścić w Commons, a tym bardziej na licencji GFDL. A.J. 09:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opisy zdjęc

[edit]

Zdjęcie Wachowskiego jest "na granicy" obowiązywania starej ustawy o prwaie autorskim, więc jeśli zostało opublikowane po dacie wejścia w życie nowej ustawy, może być z nim problem... ale źródło jest, więc dopóki nie przyczepi się do niego większy skrupulant ode mnie, to powinno być "bezpieczne"

Co do zdjęć innych osób, które zamieściłeś: najlepiej jest zachęcać je do samodzielnego zamieszczania zdjęć, bo w przeciwnym przypadku aby udokumentować fakt udzielenia zgody potrzebny jest co najmniej email do OTRS (permissions-pl@wikimedia.org), gdzie ta zgoda jest wyraźnie udzielona.

Ja np. kiedyś zamieściłem zdjęcia kolegi z pracy i dopiero później się postarałem o stosowne pozwolenie, zobacz np. Image:Korfu-RG-2005-2.jpg - bez takiego zapisu zdjęcie może być usunięte, gdyż nie ma żadnego dowodu na to, że pozwolenie zostało udzielone.

Chętnie odpowiem na wszelkie pytania związane z Commons. Pozdrawiam! A.J. 15:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zmiana nazwy

[edit]

Jedyny sposób to wgrać zdjęcie drugi raz pod nową nazwą, a starą nazwę oznaczyć szablonem {{Badname}}. Wówczas można usunąć pierwszą kopię. A.J. 19:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Galeria

[edit]

Hej :) Przepraszam, nie miałem wcześniej czasu...

Przejrzałem galerię i poprawiłem tylko mały błąd w szablonie PD-user. Co do starych zdjęć: źródło w postaci strony WWW jest nienalepsze, bo nie dokumentuje czasu powstania/publikacji zdjęcia... tym niemiej w przypadku prostych zdjęć typu reporterskiego albo studyjnego, dopóki nikt się nie przyczepi, powinno być OK. Sam niedawno wstawiłem zdjęcie sprzed 1939 ściągnięte z sieci, więc się przesadnie czepiał nie będę.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie!

A.J. 07:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Przydałoby się jeszcze wyszukać i wstawić odpowiednie kategorię dla plików. A.J. 07:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:ADAM_BARGIELSKI.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ADAM_BARGIELSKI.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:ADAM_BARGIELSKI.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • nie jest ok. Zrodlo musi byc 1szą publikacja danego wizerunku. To jest idea PD-PRL. Przeczytaj dokladnie co zakalda ustawa i pomysl wobec tego jakie to musi byc zrodlo. Ze ktos na jakiejs stronie sobie nie zastrzega praw, bo sam sciagnal fotke skads, to nic nei znaczyMasur (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Greg5pope.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zgłosiłem tę ilustrację do usunięcia, gdyż niewątpliwie przedstawia osobę znacznie starszą, niż 27 lat, a w takim wieku zmarł papież Grzegorz V. Inna ilustracja - http://www2.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/4651660/2/istockphoto_4651660-pope-gregory-v.jpg - przedstawia papieża Grzegorza V jako osobę znacznie młodszą.

Przypuszczam, że ilustracja przedstawia jakąś inną osobę o imieniu Grzegorz V: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_V --Julo (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Historię tego pliku widziałem. Nie jest w sumie istotne, kto tu popełnił błąd. Ważne jest to, że facet na obrazku ma zapewne bliżej 50 lat niż 30 i po prostu na pewno nie jest to papież Grzegorz V, a zatem niewątpliwie taka nazwa i taki podpis jaki jest - jest po prostu dezinformacją. Dlatego zgłosiłem plik do likwidacji, można wszakże załadować go pod inną nazwą. Zrobiłbym to, gdybym miał pojęcie, kim on jest, a po drugie, gdybym wiedział, czy aby na pewno Włosi użyli prawidłowej licencji. Julo (talk) 12:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Tomasz Wachowski!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm Gaczek

[edit]

To zdjęcie jest w domenie publicznej zgodnie z polskim i europejskim prawem, opłaty pobierane przez NAC nic w tej materii nie zmieniają. Pozwoliłem sobie jedynie obciąć zdjęcie do watermarku NAC. Oczywiście jeśli się nie zgadzasz i np. obawiasz się konsekwencji prawnych, możesz zgłosić do usunięcia i będziesz "kryty" nawet jak zostawnie :) Albo możesz się zadowolić korespondencją ze mną i w razie czego mnie będą ścigać (w stawaniu przed sądem za działalność wikipedystyczną mam już pewne doświadczenie). Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 11:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odp. Image:Zytkiewicz Stanislaw.jpg

[edit]

Witaj. Pewnie takich opisów jest jeszcze kilka. Dwa lata temu nie za bardzo wiedziałem jakie licencje w jakim przypadku wrzucać. Kiedyś muszę to poprawić. Pozdrawiam Pablo000 (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licencja zdjęcia lotników

[edit]

Data 1942, 70 lat upłytnie w 2013 (niby nie tak długo, ale jednak). Co do licencji "zdjęcie polskie" -- ono chyba zostało zrobione w Wielkiej Brytanii, ale to już może się ktoś inny czepnie :) (Albo jest też inny szablon). A.J. (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

[edit]

Materiały na Commons muszą mieć licencję dopuszczającą użycie komercyjne do dowolnego celu. Pokaż jednak która ilustracja cię interesuje: jeśli jest w domenie publicznej to żadne zastrzeżenia czy regulaminy jej nie dotyczą. Na marginesie: wątpię żeby KARTA miała jakiekolwiek prawa do prezentowanych zdjęć czy ilustracji, korzysta z nich zapewne na podstawie wyjątku dozwolonego użytku dla publikacji edukacyjno/naukowych: zastrzeżenie dotyczy raczej publikowanych tekstów. Zgoda portalu lub jej brak jest bez znaczenia dla statusu prawnego zdjęcia czy innego materiału, trzeba ustalić stan faktyczny. A.J. (talk) 08:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: Plik:Greg5pope.jpg

[edit]

Warunkiem przywrócenia jest podanie źródła pochodzenia. Albertus teolog (talk) 08:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jest jeszcze procedura odwoławcza COM:UDEL. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Niepokalanow Bartosik.jpg - w sprawie obrazu

[edit]

Witaj. Obrazu nie namalowałem, bo malować nie potrafię, nawet gdybym chciał. Sfotografowałem go, kiedy parę miesięcy temu byłem w Niepokalanowie, zwiedzając tamtejsze muzeum i starą kaplicę z 1927 r. Rozumiem kwestię praw autorskich, stąd 2 pytania - oświeć mnie w tej dziedzinie: - czy eksponaty wystawione do publicznego oglądania w muzeum, lub dostępne w kościele/kaplicy, można fotografować i zamieszczać na Commons, np. z adnotacją, np.: mal. Jan Kowalski, fot. Marek Nowak? Bo wiele takich ciekawostek mam na celowniku, ale z baaardzo mądrych opisów nie do końca mogę się zorientować, co wolno (jeszcze) zamieszczać, a co już nie. - czy zdjęcia robione PRZED 2. wojna światową, a więc przed PONAD 70 laty, o nieznanym statusie autora (zginął/ zmarł ze starości/ nie wiadomo kto nim był), można publikować na Commons, czy też nie? Jakiś czas temu Masur skasował z Commons fotografię mającą ponad 100 lat (wątpię, by rozmawiał z autorem :-o lub pretensje miała któraś z dzisiejszych agencji fotograficznych - wszak pod zaborami ich jeszcze nie było). Do dziś nie wiem, dlaczego tak się stało. Będę wdzięczny za wyjaśnienia. A ewentualne informacje uzupełniające chętnie mogę dodać. Fczarnowski (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ilustracja bez źródła

[edit]

Kiepsko: wygląda dość staro na PD (ale może to być stylizacja...): bez informacji o źródle ktoś ją zgłosi, jak nie teraz to za parę lat, potem przyjdzie admin i pozamiata. A.J. (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Czesław Datka

[edit]

Zdjęcie niemal na pewno robiła ta sama osoba, ale stuprocentowej pewności mieć nie możemy. Śmierć Sikorskiego była wtedy tym samym (o ile nie czymś większym) co przed rokiem śmierć Kaczyńskiego, a więc fotografów mogło być więcej. Ponadto wiemy tylko, że to zdjęcie z archiwum Czasława Datki, a nie, że to on je zrobił. Trzebaby sprawdzić kim był Czesław Datka. Dam przykład: w lutym tego roku przesłałem do Muzeum Marynarki Wojennej w Gdyni sto kilkadziesiąt zdjęć PMW z okresu II wojny światowej. Są one zdeponowane tam jako "Archiwum Piotra Domaradzkiego"... Pozdrawiam serdecznie belissarius (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • No więc skutki "research": Czesław Datka był rzeczywiście fotografem rządowym w Londynie i robił wiele zdjęć, także z pogrzebu Sikorskiego, ale "mojego" zdjęcia tam nie ma. Natomiast na "Twoim" bardziej niż trumna zainteresował mnie ORP Orkan w tle, a w zasadzie jego śródokręcie :) belissarius (talk) 00:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tadeusz_Różewicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zielona roza (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tadeusz_Różewicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zielona roza (talk) 17:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tadeusz_Różewicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zielona roza (talk) 17:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tadeusz_Różewicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zielona roza (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2 prośby

[edit]

Czołem. Miałbym dwie prośby (mam nadzieję, że to nie problem): 1) Nie zechciałbyś używać mniejszego stopnia kompresji (wyższej jakości) przy zapisie plików JPG? Chodzi mi przykładowo o ten plik: File:Logo_zmartwychwstańcy_1-R-624.jpg. Jakość pliku, który wgrałeś była fatalna z powodu zniekształceń. Te zaoszczędzone kilka, kilkanaście, a nawet kilkaset KiB nie jest warte takiego niszczenia zasobów. Przykładowo ja nigdy nie zapisuję z jakością niższą niż 95% (GIMP). A czasem kiedy materiał wyjściowy jest już i tak bardzo niskiej jakości ustawiam 98 czy nawet 99%.

2) Przy wgrywaniu plików z NAC mógłbyś w źródle zamieszczać link do tego zasobu? Owszem, można wchodzić na stronę NAC i wyszukiwać po sygnaturze pliku, ale zabiera to dużo czasu i jest uciążliwe. O ile wygodniej jest po prostu kliknąć. Przykładowo, ja podaję tak (podpatrzyłem to gdzieś):

Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe (Sygnatura: 1-G-1698) (Polish National Digital Archive)

Pozdrawiam, Kekator (talk) 10:47, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Konstanty Laszczka

[edit]

NAC nie jest ograniczone do wolnych licencji i domeny publicznej tak jak Commons. W przypadku utworów Laszczki mogą korzystać z dozwolonego użytku lub, co niewykluczone, naruszają prawa autorskie. Według obowiązującego prawa, dzieła Konstantego Laszczki przejdą do domeny publicznej dopiero w roku 2027. A.J. (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Niestety, zależność że "co znajduje się w NAC może zostać zamieszczone w Commons/Wikipedii" nie jest prawdziwa. A.J. (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
W szczególności, część zbiorów NAC to dary amych autorów lub ich spadkobierców, np. [1]. Samo przekazanie negatywów, odbitek czy innych materiałów nie oznacza jednak udzielenia licencji na dowolne ich wykorzystanie przez kogokolwiek, tak jak w przypadku materiałów obecnych w Commons. A.J. (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Owszem, można ALE UWAGA: jeśli zdjecie przedstawia rzeźbę (a nie np. artystę na tle swojej pracy), to jako utwór zależny, jest chronione również prawami autorskimi autora rzeźby, nawet jeśli samo zdjęcie jest anonimowe/niezastrzeżone. Rzeźba na zdjęciu które podałeś przykładowo jest na tyle istotną częścią zdjęcia, ze ja bym się wahał przed jego zamieszczeniem (lub wykadrował jedynie samą postać artysty); jednak można argumentować przez Commons:De minimis za jego pozostawieniem (gdyby ktoś zgłaszał zastrzeżenia) -- ale nie kiedy zdjecie przedstawia całą rzeźbę jako swój główny temat. A.J. (talk) 10:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Źle zastosowałeś tutaj szablon: nie ma powodów by przypuszczać, że Edward Hartwig nie zastrzegł swojej pracy. A.J. (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Przed 1994, prawo wymagało aby fotografie były zastrzegane np. podpisem "fot." lub "(c)" aby zyskać ochronę. Edward Hartwig jako zawodowy fotograf z pewnością tak robił. Sądzę, że nadużywasz często tego wyjątku w polskim prawie autorskim. Radziłbym przyjąć, że jeśli fotografia nie jest anonimowa, to została zastrzeżona; żeby udowodnić, że było inaczej, musiałbyś dysponować jej oryginalnym egzemplarzem. Proszę przejrzyj swój wkład i zgłoś do usunięcia te fotografie, do których zachodzą podobne wątpliwości. A.J. (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Zakopanego

[edit]

Witaj!

Zdjęłem szablon naruszenia praw autorskich z herbu Zakopanego. W opisie zabrakło informacji, że grafika ta należy do grupy wyłączonej spod działania polskiej ustawy o prawie autorskim. WarX nazywając siebie jej "autorem" oczywiście popełnił błąd, uzupełniłem więc opis aby ozdwierciedlić jego rolę. Co do tego, czy jest zasadne, aby plik SVG traktować jako utwór zależny objęty osobną licencją (Creative Commons), nie jestem pewien.

Jeśli nie wyjaśniłem wątpliwośći co do statusu prawnego, proszę o zgłoszenie grafiki w trybie regularnego (nie natychmiastowego) usunięcia opisanym na stronie COM:DEL.

Pozdrawiam, A.J. (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cerkiew w Łasku

[edit]

Wytłumaczyłam to na stronie dyskusji pliku, ale tłumaczę jeszcze raz: prowadzący stronę Aleksander Sosna oznacza w ten sposób zdjęcia, których autora nie był w stanie ustalić. Nie ma to nic wspólnego z faktycznym posiadaniem praw autorskich do pliku, bo są to fotografie cerkwi najczęściej jeszcze sprzed I wojny światowej, zabytkowe pocztówki. Ile razy udało mu się ustalić właściwego autora, podawał jego imię i nazwisko. W większości jednak było to niemożliwe, a wiek fotografii i ich anonimowość umożliwia uznanie ich za PD. Sam Sosna pisze zresztą, że nie ma w zupełności nic przeciwko wykorzystywaniu jego kolekcji poza jego stroną, byle tylko napisać, że pocztówka jest z jego zbiorów. Loraine (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli dobrze pamiętma Sosna wyjaśniał tę kwestię w jednym z albumów o nieistniejących rosyjskich cerkwiach na ziemiach polskich, gdzie jego pocztówki były wykorzystywane (Kopuły nad Wisłą jeśli dobrze pamiętam), ale jeszcze to sprawdzę. Mogę zresztą spróbować skontaktować się z nim bezpośrednio. Loraine (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apostoles Constantinople.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions?

[edit]

Hello,

Please do not tag files for speedy deletion without a valid reason. If you just have a suspicious, please create a proper deletion request. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well no. You tags are probably wrong, so don't do that. Yann (talk) 16:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Following some recent discussions, I have attempted to compile a guide to Polish copyright. It's available at User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. I'd like to invite you to comment on it, and of course you are more then welcome to improve it. I am contacting you and several other commons editors who I know work with Polish Copyrights, as I am not aware of any centralized noticeboard to reach them, feel free to pass this message to such a place if it exists, and to whoever else you think could be interested in such a topic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jozef_Andrzej_Kaja_1972.jpg

[edit]

Na jakiej zasadzie usunął Pan moje zdjęcie mojego Ojca? Urodziłem się w 1954 roku. Niech Pan sobie policzy (na kalkulatorku?), ile mam lat i czy w 1972 roku mogłem je mojemu Tacie zrobić. Jestem redaktorem i prawami autorskimi zajmuję się zawodowo od kilkudziesięciu lat i po raz pierwszy czytałem tak kuriozalne uzasadnienie tego, że istnieje podejrzenie, że zdjęcie narusza prawa autorskie. Od którego roku, Pana zdaniem, wykonane zdjęcie zaczyna być wiarygodne? Od 1975? A może dopiero od 1990? To jest po prostu śmieszne! Proszę o natychmiastowe przywrócenie pliku! Januszkaja (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo mi przykro ale Twoje wyjaśnienia na stronie dyskusji mojego Ojca są zupełnie nietrafione. Data powstania zdjęcia nie ma absolutnie nic wspólnego z prawami autorskimi. Ojciec wykonał kilkaset zdjęć mojej osoby i zapewne kilka tysięcy innych na długo przed moimi urodzinami. Spodziewasz się, że ktokolwiek będzie pamiętał każdą datę zdjęcia wykonanego w przeciągu ostatnich 40 lat? Zdjęcia robione do archiwów prywatnych nie były tworzone z myślą o wstawianiu na wiki, gdyż tej nawet w planach nie było. Zmieniłem datę zdjęcia w moim brudnopisie gdyż wnioskowałem na podstawie orderów, a Dziadek order Krzyża Kawalerskiego Odrodzenia Polski dostał w 1972. Podsumowując: czy zwykła, drobna pomyłka ma cokolwiek wspólnego z PA? To było retoryczne pytanie. Proszę uprzejmie o przywrócenie grafiki.--jakubkaja (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Acha, myślałem, że jesteś adminem, a Ty tylko tak społecznie dziwne wnioski wyciągasz i wstawiasz szablony ze swoimi "uzasadnionymi" wątpliwościami. Dobra, któryś z nas napisze do jakiegoś admina.--jakubkaja (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rzeczywiście jesteś unikalny w swoich działaniach (PUA pacynki na plwiki też ciekawe). Pierwszy raz widzę, żeby ktoś usunął plik za poprawienie błędu. Najwyraźniej każdy pretekst jest dobry. I nie wiem po co podajesz mi stronkę do "UploadWizard" pisząc, że to stronka pomocy, ale ok... --jakubkaja (talk) 09:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nie przypominam sobie żebym potrzebował od Ciebie pomocy czy o nią prosił. Dla mnie najlepszą pomocą jest to, że mi się nie przeszkadza. Ale widzę, że dalej ciśniesz i o coś próbujesz się dopytywać u innych na temat moich grafik. Możesz sobie znaleźć ciekawsze zajęcie? Zdjęcia zostały opublikowane w 1975 roku bez wyraźnego zastrzeżenia praw autorskich. Oczywiście wszystkie fotografie spełniają w 100% wypunktowane w licencji warunki. jakubkaja (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Czy ty masz problemy z rozumieniem czytanego tekstu? Znajdź sobie inną zabawę!!! Nie masz już 5 lat, widzę Twoje fotki tutaj i wyglądasz na dorosłego. Ojciec będący autorem i właścicielem pełni praw do pliku "Józef Kaja.jpg" udzielił zgody na publikacje na stronie dyskusji pliku. jakubkaja (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 07:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm the author of all chinese bridge photos I publish with the mention "own work", you can verificate, I have two cameras, a small panasonic and a nikon, all photos were taken during two summer trip in 2011 and 2012, I can give you any proof you want. There's freedom of panorama in china, so these photos are ok for commons --Glabb (talk) 18:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Licencja na której to opublikowałeś mówi wyraźnie że dotyczy to zdjęć opublikowanych bez wyraźnego zastrzeżenia o prawach autorskich. To że zdjęcie jest w NAC nie świadczy o tym że zostało opublikowane a już na pewno nie o tym że tych zastrzeżeń nie było. Najpierw trzeba by potwierdzić status tego zdjęcia w Kurierze a potem ewentualnie zastanawiać się czy zdjęcie z NAC można brać.Plushy (talk) 12:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • NAC to żadna domena publiczna, to archiwum które zarabia na swoich zbiorach. 1918-1928 to przybliżony czas wykonania zdjęcia, nie ma żadnych dowodów że zostało ono wtedy opublikowane bez zastrzeżeń o prawach autorskich. Mogło zostać opublikowane z zastrzeżonymi prawami lub mogło nie zostać opublikowane. Plushy (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Piotr Zajlich 1-K-12022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Plushy (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plik:Latour Stanislaw .jpg

[edit]

Witaj! Podałam w opisie źródło, gdzie jest napisane: Ten plik udostępniony jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 3.0. Niestety nie rozumiem, co nie jest w porządku? Pomożesz zrozumieć? Pozdrawiam--Joanna Kośmider (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rzeczywiście! To przegapiłam. Miałam zaufanie do Andriuszy, który pewnie pełne szuflady zdjęć po swoim ojcu Andrzeju E. Androchowiczu, a tu tymczasem wziął niby z Wikipedii... Szkoda. Spróbuję do niego napisać, ale tam dyskusja jest raczej pusta...--Joanna Kośmider (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Antonzurak.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Antonzurak.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia powstańców

[edit]

Opieramy się tylko na tym, co o zdjęciu napisał NAC. Jeśli oni "pękli", to bez innego źródła nie możemy udowodnić stanu prawnego. Do usunięcia, jeśli mi wskażesz te pliki, to mogę od ręki bez przechodzenia przez COM:DEL. A.J. (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli zdjęcia mają zastrzeżenie, to będą usunięte. Nie widzę fizycznych możliwości zakwestionowania takiego oświadczenia poza wejściem w spór sądowy ze spadkobiercami. A.J. (talk) 08:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Już ktoś skasował :) Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ceferino Giménez Malla.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ramones deprecated (talk) 06:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia z NAC

[edit]

Cześć!

Widziałem, że załadowałeś tutaj pewną liczbę zdjęć z NAC. Jak uzyskałeś kopie bez ich logo w narożnikach? Ja też znalazłem kilka, które zostały opublikowane dawno temu bez informacji o autorze i przeszły w ten sposób do PD, ale nie wiem jak je wyciągnąć z zasobów NAC bez tego oszpecenia.

Gżdacz (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:InstytutRadowy.Warszawa1932.png

[edit]

Dzień dobry! Bardzo proszę o sprawdzenie, czy nie złamałam prawa... Czy mogę podobnie postąpić z innymi zdjęciami z tego źródła? --Joanna Kośmider (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egzekucja w Cycowie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.7.227.18 22:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quadro raffigurante la decollazione di Sant' Emidio IMG 0051.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Canoura.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Canoura.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Canoura.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Luis Campos Górriz.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luis Campos Górriz.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Luis Campos Górriz.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pomoc

[edit]

Dzień dobry.

Zauważyłem, że wgrywa Pan archiwalne grafiki. Jeśli jest możliwe, bardzo proszę o odszukanie i wgranie jakiegoś zdjęcia Edyty Wojtczak.

Artur Andrzej (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlo Chiarlo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Związek Górali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goralenvolk 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marian Januszajtis-Żegota.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zoe Băicoianu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erich Hampe 2-13343.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Władyslaw Sikorski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henryk Krajewski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zygmunt Beczkowicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolf Pilch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolf Wamper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jozef Tiso (Berlin).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogrzeb gen W Sikorskiego 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol Rolle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henryk Przeździecki.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol Wojtyła 19-4-22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walther Hewel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank i Krzeptowski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol Hukan 1-K-3204.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogrzeb gen W Sikorskiego 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogrzeb gen W Sikorskiego 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogrzeb gen W Sikorskiego 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jędrusie 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pogrzeb gen W Sikorskiego 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katastrofa lotnicza samolotu C-87 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katastrofa lotnicza samolotu C-87 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ORP Wicher 1-W-2040-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viktoras Gailius.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Józef Chaciński.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jędrusie 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerzy Iszkowski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marian Pisarek.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlo Chiarlo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egzekucja w Palmirach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Search-vector-results-pl.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.206.138.155 21:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jozef Tiso (Berlin).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georg Elser 2-12179.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zygmunt Kęstowicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julian Tuwim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

#invoke:Autotranslate ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]