User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2019/Q1

Happy New 2019

	Happy New 2019
	Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur September 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur September 2012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur September 2012 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-Mile Drive Monterey September 2012 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus occidentalis Monterey September 2012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The file is very small. But the bird is sharp and good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-Mile Drive Monterey September 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-Mile Drive Monterey September 2012 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-Mile Drive Monterey September 2012 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus occidentalis Monterey September 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Moving files to Commons

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Moving files to Commons is available for translation. You can translate it here:

• translate to Spanish
• translate to Chinese

The priority of this page is low.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 09:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish April 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-Mile Drive Monterey September 2012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish May 2011 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish April 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! I-880 Hayward May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-SPAN Bus Philadelphia July 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Square Shanghai November 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A bit soft, maybe lack of DoF --The Photographer 22:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Square Shanghai November 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A bit soft --The Photographer 22:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Square Shanghai November 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. However, the lack of sharpening here is more evitent. Its ok for QI --The Photographer 22:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puxi Shanghai November 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Try fix the noise in the sky --The Photographer 22:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Done King of Hearts 00:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. It was difficult to see the differents on noise level, I invite you to use some IA software like neat image --The Photographer 00:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoover Tower Stanford November 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 22:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pudong Shanghai November 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yu Garden Shanghai November 2017 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:OTRS received

Hi, this category is for files with the blue {OTRS received} template. We deleted files if they have still this template 30 days after our first human response. If there was not yet a response, we reset the timer, e.g. here. The length of the backlog has nothing to do with this part of the process. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

See also this good example of how it works. Jcb (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pudong Shanghai November 2017 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pudong Shanghai November 2017 HDR panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Beautiful. --Tournasol7 00:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Library of Congress Washington April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! United States Botanic Garden Washington April 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! United States Botanic Garden Washington April 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anser anser Newark April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anser anser Newark April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable. --GerifalteDelSabana 05:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coyote Hills Fremont April 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Newark April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! United States Botanic Garden Washington April 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)  Done King of Hearts 18:48, 21 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boston skyline from Mount Auburn October 2014 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boston skyline from South Boston November 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Shanghai skyline November 2017, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Shanghai skyline November 2017 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anatidae hybrid Newark April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anser anser Newark April 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta canadensis Fremont April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Fremont April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nicely sharp --Podzemnik 07:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Fremont April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nicely sharp --Podzemnik 07:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbarton Bridge Fremont April 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakeshore Park Newark April 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Jose April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Jose April 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygnus olor New York November 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos domesticus Palo Alto May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Palo Alto May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columba livia Palo Alto May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Golden Gate Park San Francisco December 2016 006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Gate Park San Francisco December 2016 006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Small, but good. --Tournasol7 07:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos domesticus Palo Alto May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyanocitta stelleri Big Sur May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hereford cattle Big Sur May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos domesticus Palo Alto May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta canadensis Palo Alto May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cairina moschata Palo Alto May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bixby Creek Bridge May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hereford cattle Big Sur May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment - If you can identify the bird on the cow, please do. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the bird --Michielverbeek 07:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus californicus Palo Alto May 2011 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southside Drive Yosemite August 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley View Yosemite August 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuolumne Meadows Yosemite August 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus occidentalis Palo Alto May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Small, but good. --Tournasol7 00:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley View Yosemite August 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 22:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main part of teh photo --Michielverbeek 23:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Question

Hi! Thanks again for your comment on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouddorpse-Reddingsbrigade-02-2018.jpg. I was unsure which of the images from the scenery could reach FP bar. I would be interestend on your opinion of the following images:

• File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp-Duinen-Aussichtsturm-2018.jpg
• File:Ouddorpse-Reddingsbrigade-01-2018.jpg
• File:Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg
• File:Sandhuegel-Strandpaviljoen-Paal-10-Ouddorp.jpg

Do you think one of the images above are better than the nominee? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

In terms of light and color, these are all excellent; where they differ is on composition. The first one is a little too left-heavy for my taste, with nothing of interest on the right side to balance it out. The second one is a "standard" composition (don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with it, half of my own FPs are "standard" compositions of cityscapes/architecture), but I generally ask for "more" such as beautiful clouds or very high resolution. The third is a nice, expansive view; I like it, though it would be even better as a stitched pano. The fourth has the most interesting composition, and I'd nominate that if I were you. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your assessment. After the discussion on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouddorpse-Reddingsbrigade-02-2018.jpg I am really discouraged to make further nominations :( Not because of the declining votes but because of the culture of discussion. Things have changed here... --Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, though some could complain that the image is a bit soft on the chicks. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Death Valley National Park December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hereford cattle Big Sur May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition and size not "exciting", but good enough for QI in my opinion. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa August 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 01:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grant Lake Mammoth September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver Lake Mammoth September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite Falls Trail May 2011 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grant Lake Mammoth September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Mary Mammoth September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Rock Canyon California September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ikan Kekek 06:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver Lake Mammoth September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. A possible FP? -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake George Mammoth September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Rock Canyon California September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gull Lake Mammoth September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grant Lake Mammoth September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver Lake Mammoth September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment - This looks like a possible FP to me. Several of your pictures of this lake do. Pick the one you like best and nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment I just want to second Ikan’s suggestion. --Aristeas 09:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment Yes, FPC, perhaps dehaze/clarity rear of photo Seven Pandas 13:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grant Lake Mammoth September 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gull Lake Mammoth September 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! June Lake Mammoth September 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! June Lake Mammoth September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake George Mammoth September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa September 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Rock Canyon California September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake George Mammoth September 2016 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake George Mammoth September 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake George Mammoth September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa September 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport Jersey City June 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)--Horst J. Meuter 08:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice light --Podzemnik 04:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Pacific Railway 1095 Kingston July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ferry Kingston July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfe Island Ontario July 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

For fixing my nomination. :-) --Dktue (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Newport Jersey City June 2015 panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newport Jersey City June 2015 panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Stanford May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Stanford May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Stanford May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun and Moon Pagodas Guilin HDR panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun and Moon Pagodas Guilin HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but maybe a bit tilted to the right --Podzemnik 05:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronghu Lake Guilin HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gull Lake Mammoth September 2016 panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gull Lake Mammoth September 2016 panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)