User talk:Kicior99
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 08:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 9a7999805a9c4749b18da36abf4875a4
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Image Tagging Image:Somerset-coa.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Somerset-coa.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. OsamaK 15:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:NPether.jpg is uncategorized since 17 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Gay bear flag in action bristol.jpeg is uncategorized since 23 March 2009.
- Image:Pichci.jpg is uncategorized since 9 May 2009.
- Image:Legenda.png was uncategorized on 3 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Samszczyt.jpg was uncategorized on 12 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Slezatest.png was uncategorized on 17 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Diagram Jonesa dla samogłosek szwedzkich.png was uncategorized on 8 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Vadheterdu.png was uncategorized on 10 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Cornish pasty.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Zaimki w konstrukcji przydawkowej.png was uncategorized on 11 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Czytanie.png was uncategorized on 12 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Crossection.png was uncategorized on 12 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Jones szw.svg was uncategorized on 12 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Grawis.png was uncategorized on 12 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Przyimki.png was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Funkcje.svg was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Chamsky2.png was uncategorized on 16 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Korta.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Barnproj.png was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Geringer4.png was uncategorized on 23 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:46, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Szczecin1.png was uncategorized on 25 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Geringer11.png was uncategorized on 27 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Geringer11.svg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Geringer9a.png was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Image:Stacja kolejowa w Northampton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Patrícia msg 21:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bristolcut1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bristolcut1.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-mattbuck (Talk) 12:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Szyld kornwalijski w Penzance.jpg
[edit]File:Szyld kornwalijski w Penzance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Parrot of Doom (talk) 12:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I do not believe your image to be derivative, and have put my comments at the discussion. All the best & Happy New Year.--MacRusgail (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Stjuist_crest_jpg_300.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marnanel (talk) 02:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Broc (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
POTY votes
[edit]Remember that you can vote only once in the final round; I saw you voted for more than one image in the final round: I suggest you to remove all your votes and leave just one, otherwise none of your votes will be counted. Have a nice day, --Broc (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Geringer.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please see the file's page for more info.
→AzaToth 23:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
In other languages (translate this)
|
---|
|
Thank you for uploading File:Geringer.png!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
|
→AzaToth 23:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Nine maiden jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative files
[edit]Cześć Kicior99,
may you please use the Template:Derived from to tag derivative files? At File:Car inside.png I've demonstrated this.
BTW: Are you really, that you've derived it from File:Interni Opel Astra A.JPG?
Yours sincerely, Loverslime (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cigg.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cigg.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cigg.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
We need permission from the copyright holder of the pictured graphical item. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Kicior99,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
File:RIAS audibility.png
[edit]Hej File:RIAS audibility.png - zgodnie z lokalizacją pl:Hof (Bawaria) niebieski krąg jest nieprawidłowo zakotwiczony. Na obrazie jest zaznaczony jakby nadajnik był na terytorium NRD. PMG (talk) 12:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Mydesk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Castillo blanco (talk) 07:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Aktualizacja historii rozwoju Kolei Dolnośląskich
[edit]Dzień Dobry. Pisze odnośnie mapy z 2011 roku, która jest mocno nieaktualna. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geringer6a.png#mw-jump-to-license Mapa w linku nie przedstawia rozwoju Kolei Dolnośląskich z lat 2011-2019. Mapa jest umieszczona poprawnie tu: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koleje_Dolno%C5%9Bl%C4%85skie#Po%C5%82%C4%85czenia_sezonowe, ale problem w tym, że czytający artykuł na temat tego przewoźnika nie ma zobrazowanego obecnie rozwoju spółki kolejowej.
Z uszanowaniem Jarosław Masłowski (talk) 14:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Jarosław Masłowski
Aktualizacja historii rozwoju Kolei Dolnośląskich
[edit]Dzień Dobry. Pisze odnośnie mapy z 2011 roku, która jest mocno nieaktualna. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geringer6a.png#mw-jump-to-license Mapa w linku nie przedstawia rozwoju Kolei Dolnośląskich z lat 2011-2019. Mapa jest umieszczona poprawnie tu: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koleje_Dolno%C5%9Bl%C4%85skie#Po%C5%82%C4%85czenia_sezonowe, ale problem w tym, że czytający artykuł na temat tego przewoźnika nie ma zobrazowanego obecnie rozwoju spółki kolejowej.
Z uszanowaniem Jarosław Masłowski (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Slezatest.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Slezatest.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:DKA logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Masti (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
À W SANGSUE
[edit]les petites annonces Gouvernemene AUGMENTANT AUGMENTANT véritablement VENRDEDI Channel Hier Matin République Jean-Baptistons Famille informations sur environnemental de international Antirouille peuple FAMILY w Gouvernemene Gouvernemene AUGMENTANT 200.113.238.140 20:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gwałciciel.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Gwałciciel.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gwałciciel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)