User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

christmas

[edit]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! DenesFeri (talk) 09:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uncia_uncia_heads

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Uncia uncia heads has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leyo 17:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<noinclude>

[edit]

Hello,
I don't mind you adding <noinclude> arround categories,
but, please, don't suppress interwiki links to articles like here.
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 23. jan 2012, 18:24

I have put them into the gallery page. --Kersti (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but they should also be in the category (You put both interwiki to category and interwiki to articles in articles). Regards Liné1 (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I intendet to put the category interwikis in the category an the article interwikis in the gallery - but put the <noinclude>-tag in the wrong place. --Kersti (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you just put both in both ? Regards Liné1 (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is no problem in this case, but if there are about 20 interwikis to articles and about ten links to categorys I want to have the articles in the gallery page and the categories in the category. --Kersti (talk) 13:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please my frend, stop putting interwiki in </noinclude>.
I like your concept of putting category in </noinclude> to have articles contain only <gallery>. (You know that I try to sell it to others)
But I really don't see why, we should maintain interwiki in both categories and articles (This I really don't see how I could sell it).
Don't tell me you want categories interwiki in categories and article interwiki in articles:
  1. There are mostly categories interwiki for families (no genus, no species) => your idea works only for families
  2. Categories and articles have different meaning in commons and wikipedia (there is no symetry): article are now only summaries+details of categories on commons. Where articles are the main purpose on wikipedias.
But most important of all it will really break all bot behavior.
Most of the bots are about interwiki so they will be bothered by your behavior. You will soon have 50% the interwiki out of the noinclude and 50% in the noinclude
I have fixed my bot to manage category between noinclude (I know only my bot to modify categories, but maybee some other bot developper will have to fix their bot and wont like it).
But if you put other things between noinclude then all the bots are dead.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting idea

[edit]

Hello my friend,
We are discussion your good idea (article including the category) here.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New category

[edit]

In line with your new Category:Flying birds catching food from the water surface‎, i created Category:Flying birds in contact with water, as this is a rare subject. (new image just uploaded fits the category, there should be others).Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tockus ruahae

[edit]

Hi,

I noticed you re categorized some of my birds as Category:Tockus ruahae. If you are an expert on subject, I will add rename suggestions on those files. Thank you for your efforts.

Regards, Nevit --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being "Expert" was not the reason for the recategorisation. In the description the bird was called "Tockus (erythrorhynchus) ruahae" - in IOC this subspecies is recogniced as full species and as we usually follow IOC-classification I categoriced it accordingly. User:JMK was the one who added the subspecies. I guess, he was right to do so, as the subspecies is called "Tanzania Red-billed Hornbill" --Kersti (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

[edit]

hierfür. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Species name templates

[edit]

Hello my friend,
Are you sure that Category:Species name templates is a good idea?
I understand the idea but can you imagine how many template you will have to create ?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think, when people can have their own languages on commons-galleries and in file description pages, the description starts to be useful for people who are not working in science itself. I think, if I make a template for each bird species - and at least this I will manage - than others will start to do the same for other animals. That the insects and so on never will be ready is clear, but pages often used by people which are not biologists are managable.
I now know, how to use the :list for a VN-Template too:
Example: {{Turdus merula|short}} looks
Blackbird, Common Blackbird
Example: {{Turdus merula|medium}} looks
Blackbird, Common Blackbird  (Turdus merula, cat. )
Example: {{Turdus merula|long}} looks
Vernacular names [edit] [edit specified wikidata 'Common Blackbird'] Wikidata 'Common Blackbird' linked to current user_talk
Other Uses:
I made up a Template which makes use of {{Turdus merula|3}} and provides an additional editlink, so that people know, where to add additional translations. It will replace VN where the Species name template is ready.
Example: {{CN|Turdus merula}} looks
Vernacular names [edit] [edit specified wikidata 'Common Blackbird'] Wikidata 'Common Blackbird' linked to current user_talk
Example: {{TN|Turdus merula}} looks
Blackbird, Common Blackbird  (Turdus merula, cat. )
It is already used in the headlines of Acanthizidae, Acanthisittidae, in the descriptions in Acanthisittidae#More than one species and in File description pages like File:Likely an Inland thornbill.jpg
Australasian warblers  (Acanthizidae, cat. )
Picture: Speckled Warbler  (Pyrrholaemus sagittatus, cat. )
Example: [[File:Speckeld warbler.jpg|thumb|{{TNF|Acanthizidae|{{TN|Pyrrholaemus sagittatus}}}}]] looks
I start to use it now in Passeriformes in the galleries there.
--Kersti (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see some bugs in {{EN}}: it misses a div as you can see above + you need to find a template to diplay something instead of Bearbeiten.
By the way what does "EN" mean ?
Liné1 (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just started to work on the template a few seconds ago, therefore faults are normal. And I think, there is already a list of translations for "bearbeiten" (which means "edit") somewhere hidden in Commons, I just have to find the template. Kersti (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think, now Template:EN is OK. Maybe Template CN for Common names is a better name for it? --Kersti (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parulidae

[edit]

Hi Kersti - it is still out of date; all the images are still indexed under the old IOC 2.10 and need to be renamed to IOC 2.11 (e.g. there should be nothing left under the header Dendroica, and lots under Setophaga). It's a huge job to re-do it all. - MPF (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is work of some days - and as this a gallery page I made and as I did this kind of work all the year, you simply could have told me, that this page is the next one to edit. A few days later it would have been ready. As this old classification was correct half a year ago, there is no reason to redirect it. In most wikipedias the classification is much older. --Kersti (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Species name templates

[edit]

Before Category:Species name templates grows too big for maintenance I think we should work the templates.
The templates need to be as simple as possible, if you want a chance to be followed.

  • I don't see the purpose of {{Turdus merula|2}}. The "Modify" link is really mandatory.
  • The taxon templates are too complex: first line of each template is too complex + use of Species name template
  • It is sad to have to use other templates like CN, TN, TNF in combination with {{Turdus merula}}
  • Too many templates involved (their documentation would have to reference all the possibilities):

A first solution

  1. We could integrate the first line of each template in a template like {{VNIncluded}} with a parameter template=<name of the template>
  2. We could integrate the code of VN2 and CN in {{VN}} with a single parameter edit=<name of the page/template to edit>
  3. {{VNIncluded}} could integrate the code of Species name template

Result:

  1. Only one template {{VNIncluded}} (instead of VN2, CN, TN, TNF, Species name template)
  2. {{VNIncluded}} would also display what Species name template currently displays (with {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|)
    1. {{Turdus merula|short}} would display what {{Turdus merula|1}} currently displays
    2. {{Turdus merula|medium}} would display what {{TN|Turdus merula}} currently displays
    3. {{Turdus merula|medium|<description>}} would display what {{TNF|Turdus merula}} currently displays
    4. {{Turdus merula|long}} would display what {{CN|Turdus merula}} currently displays
  3. {{VNIncluded}} would document everything: the 4 usage of the (with {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|)

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you can show me, that it works - and that it is possible to integrate additional template possibilities - it would be wonderful! The less there is in the species name template itself the better most Users will know what to do. Kersti (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, cool.
I am preparing a demo with {{Turdus merula}}, {{VNIncluded}} and no other template (I already added param |edit= to {{VN}} ;-))
I will tell you when it works.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As you are experimenting with Turdus merula, I replaced it on the tree of life page. Kersti (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can see the result in my sandbox. Feel free to modify it. Liné1 (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better, we should use the official test page {{VNIncluded/testcases}}. Feel free to modify it. Liné1 (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How did you manage, that medium looks like TN? Kersti (talk) 09:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simply search for medium in {{VNIncluded}} ;-) Liné1 (talk) 09:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TOL discussion

[edit]

Hi Kersti Nebelsiek; I didn't see that you were invited to join the latest discussion of your work at Commons_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#User:Kersti_Nebelsiek_idea_2:_template_for_langage. Your comments are welcome. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 02:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot

[edit]

Thanks for the unidentified bird drawind (1, 2, 3...)
I like them so much, it is a pity when they are unidentified.
Thanks again. Liné1 (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you have time, there are others:
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As in many cases we don't have another picture of the bird in Question it is really a pity! --Kersti (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my friend, I forgot to mention, the most important: Category:Ibis (journal) unidentified species. Cheers Liné1 (talk) 05:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How to suppress CN, TN, TNF, Species name template

[edit]

Hello Kersti.
I am studying how to suppress the unneeded CN, TN, TNF, Species name template.

  1. TNF is no more used
  2. CN is no more used
  3. TN has 365 usages:
    {{TN|Acanthisittidae}} displays:
    New Zealand wren  (Acanthisittidae, cat. )
    Result is correct !!!
    =>First we migrate manually all Category:Species name templates (We can take all the time we want)
    =>Then we run Liné1bot to transform the 365 {{TN|<taxonName>}} by {{<taxonName>|medium}}

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, all the templates are migrated.
Only the last step involving my bot is needed.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 14:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AphanapteryxLeguati.JPG

[edit]
File:AphanapteryxLeguati.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 00:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doubts

[edit]

Hello Kersti. Could you have a second look on these pictures, they might be in the wrong categories. Thx. Cheers --Chris.urs-o (talk) 00:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AphanapteryxBonasia.JPG

[edit]
File:AphanapteryxBonasia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BuschBildC0569.JPG

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


File:Kraftgriff 0578.JPG

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Maiestas vetus aedeagus.jpg

[edit]

There is no copyright vio here! The image is a photo taken by me. I make a comparison to a published line drawing of the same structure. Please check with me before (mis)interpreting my work. Thanks Stho002 (talk) 21:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it just after adding the template, but it seems that I didn't revert all changes the Notification of possible copyvio made. Sorry for this. Somehow this function ist to simple and therefore one knows not all things one has tio revert. --Kersti (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MonographTrochiSupplementGoul 0060.jpg

[edit]

File:MonographTrochiSupplementGoul 0060.jpg It seems a failed upload, do u want to upload a new version of the file? --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You could have done it too as the original is linked in the "source" line of the description page.--Kersti (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry, I didn't see it ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nannopsittaca panychlora Keulemans.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour, pourrais-tu retirer le bout du bec de Microcerculus ustulatus qui reste dans le plumage de l'oiseau ? Merci pour ton travail. Cordialement - Goudron92 (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Google traduction) : Hallo, könnten Sie entfernen die Spitze des Schnabels Microcerculus ustulatus noch im Gefieder des Vogels? Vielen Dank für Ihre Arbeit. herzlich

Voila! --Kersti (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Super, vielen Dank - Goudron92 (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ploceus cucullatus nests

[edit]

Meinst du wirklich (hier und hier), dass der Dorfweber im Hibiskus in ca. 1 m Höhe ein Nest gebaut hat? --Atamari (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kersti_Nebelsiek/Archiv/2012&oldid=372583316"