User talk:Kasos fr
Bonjour, Je crée cette page le 3 juillet 2007 --Cordialement, Kasos_France, 22:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Copyright
[edit]Nearly everything you can found in Internet has copyright, so you cannot copy it without permission. Please take a look to Commons:À propos des licences. Regards. --Dodo 20:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tas3c.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.81.114.142 00:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Sophia6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Pl06 pierre laffitte rc.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Pl03 pierre laffitte r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Fsa2 place sophie laffitte.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Fsa3 fondation.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Fsa4 fondation.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Batiment-sophia2 allergan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Batiment-sophia4 amadeus r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Batiment-sophia6 ecole des mines r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Batiment-sophia8 ceram r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Batiment-sophia11 inpi r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Sophia5r.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Image:Sophia antipolis2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Fresque tas2r.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Croix2_800.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Tas logoaeroc.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Eusebius (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cannes_croix-des-gardes2.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cannes_croix-des-gardes2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Roger-Maurice_Bonnet_2.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Roger-Maurice_Bonnet_2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Roger-Maurice_Bonnet_2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Herschel_planck_team.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Herschel_planck_team.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dome_planck_vitrine.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dome_planck_vitrine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dome_planck_hfi.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dome_planck_hfi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:André_Brahic_Cannes.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:André_Brahic_Cannes.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Planck_dome.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Planck_dome.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fleur_de_lune_5f.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fleur_de_lune_5f.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Apstar_6.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Apstar_6.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Paternité - explication
[edit]Bonjour. Vous avez importé des photos, toutes marquées "travail personnel", créditées à des auteurs différents. Comme aucun d'eux n'est publiquement lié à votre compte, nous aurions normalement besoin de permissions explicites de l'auteur pour continuer de publier ces fichiers. Plusieurs solutions s'offrent à vous :
- Vous pouvez rendre votre identité publique en l'associant à votre compte. Par exemple, si vous êtes effectivement Guy Lebègue, l'idée est de mettre Guy Lebègue dans le champ "auteur" ou de mettre un mot sur votre identité sur votre page perso.
- Vous pouvez choisir de ne pas associer publiquement votre nom à votre compte. Dès lors, il nous faudra un e-mail de permission, envoyé à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org, faisant le lien entre les deux. Le lien ne sera pas rendu public mais un "ticket OTRS" sera apposé sur les images pour dire que le statut de l'image, en termes de droit d'auteur, a été vérifié même si l'auteur n'est pas le contributeur.
- Pour les images dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur, il faut que le photographe (d'une manière générale le propriétaire des droits, par exemple dans le cas où un contrat les aurait transférés à l'ESA) nous envoie un e-mail de permission à la même adresse.
Cordialement, --Eusebius (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- OK, bien compris, je pense. Je choisis la seconde solution et j'essaie d'envoyer ce mail. --Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 11:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Photos by Guy Lebègue - French Riviera has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
-- Docu at 05:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Stratobus artiste.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Stratobus artiste.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ariadacapo (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, cette photo a été placée sur Wikimedia Commons "avec la permission du conférencier". Malheureusement ce n’est pas suffisant pour assurer son partage ici: la source indique "crédit Thales Alenia Space" et seul Thales peut placer l’image sous licence libre. Merci de votre compréhension. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Merci de l'info. J'ai transmis au responsable du programme Stratobus chez Thales Alenia Space pour qu'il me fasse parvenir le mail nécessaire. Mais, ce sont les vacances solaires de la zone et j'espère qu'il pourra répondre dans le délai de 7 jours!--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour; merci pour votre prise de contact. J’ai changé le statut de l’image en attendant la réponse. Cela nous laisse un peu plus de 7 jours. Bonne continuation ! Ariadacapo (talk) 13:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Merci pour ce délai qui sera probablement nécessaire car la juriste qui s'occupe du programme est en vacances. Comme je le disais au responsable du programme, ce serait dommage qu'un tel nouveau projet assez inédit n'ait pas la moindre illustration. D'autant plus q'elle a déjà été reprise dans la presse, mais évidemment avec le statut de copyright Thales, comme c'est le cas pour l'annonce de sa conférence dans le blog 3AF. Je pouvais dire aussi que c'est moi qui avait pris la photo avec mon smartphone pendant ladite conférence, avec l'accord du conférencier?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nous verrons ce qu’en pense Thales. Prenez bien soin d’obtenir une autorisation explicite, comme celles proposées par OTRS. Wikimedia Commons n’a généralement pas beaucoup de succès auprès des entreprises. Concernant le droit d’auteur du photographe (vous) et du conférencier, ils ne s’appliquent pas ici : la reproduction fidèle d’une œuvre n’est pas un travail original protégé par le droit d’auteur. C’est en fait une très bonne chose: par exemple, photographier le tableau de la Joconde ne permet (heureusement) pas d’appliquer une nouvelle couche de restrictions par dessus une œuvre faisant partie du domaine public. Bonne continuation ! Ariadacapo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Cela fait longtemps que je milite pour que Thales et les grands institutionnels du spatial ESA et CNES, publient sur leurs sites web des galeries de photos libres de droit (selon la licence demandée par WP). Je vois avec plaisir que vous contribuez au programme Airbus, ce doit être pareil. J'ai une anecdote croustillante avec l'ESA que je ne me permet pas de diffuser largement.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonne nouvelle. Je viens de recevoir la permission par mail. J'ai créé un fichier PDF du mail. Comment dois-je faire pour le faire parvenir au bon endroit ?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Très bien! Mais le PDF du mail n’est probablement pas utile. Il faudrait que les détenteurs des droits écrivent directement à OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) avec une autorisation-type. Lorsque l’email sera traité, l’image recevra un ticket dont le numéro sera posté sur la page de l’image. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Cela fait maintenant 4 jours que j'ai envoyé le mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org<permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>; et je n'ai pas de réponse ni même le moindre accusé de réception. Est-ce que vous avez le pouvoir de faire accélérer le processus? Si oui, pouvez-vous me donner une adresse mail pour que je vous transfère mon mail du 8 ?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Non. Si les détenteurs des droits ont écrit directement à OTRS votre ticket finira par être traité. Il n’y aura pas de réponse ni d’accusé de réception. Envoyer le mail vous-même (surtout si vous n’avez pas utilisé une autorisation-type et que la formulation est ambigüe ou incomplète) ne suffira probablement pas, comme je l’ai déjà expliqué plus haut, et risque simplement de rallonger le délai. La queue pour les emails est actuellement de 71 jours. OTRS est géré par des volontaires comme vous et moi. Merci de respecter et faciliter leur travail. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Cela fait maintenant 4 jours que j'ai envoyé le mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org<permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>; et je n'ai pas de réponse ni même le moindre accusé de réception. Est-ce que vous avez le pouvoir de faire accélérer le processus? Si oui, pouvez-vous me donner une adresse mail pour que je vous transfère mon mail du 8 ?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Très bien! Mais le PDF du mail n’est probablement pas utile. Il faudrait que les détenteurs des droits écrivent directement à OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) avec une autorisation-type. Lorsque l’email sera traité, l’image recevra un ticket dont le numéro sera posté sur la page de l’image. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonne nouvelle. Je viens de recevoir la permission par mail. J'ai créé un fichier PDF du mail. Comment dois-je faire pour le faire parvenir au bon endroit ?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Cela fait longtemps que je milite pour que Thales et les grands institutionnels du spatial ESA et CNES, publient sur leurs sites web des galeries de photos libres de droit (selon la licence demandée par WP). Je vois avec plaisir que vous contribuez au programme Airbus, ce doit être pareil. J'ai une anecdote croustillante avec l'ESA que je ne me permet pas de diffuser largement.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nous verrons ce qu’en pense Thales. Prenez bien soin d’obtenir une autorisation explicite, comme celles proposées par OTRS. Wikimedia Commons n’a généralement pas beaucoup de succès auprès des entreprises. Concernant le droit d’auteur du photographe (vous) et du conférencier, ils ne s’appliquent pas ici : la reproduction fidèle d’une œuvre n’est pas un travail original protégé par le droit d’auteur. C’est en fait une très bonne chose: par exemple, photographier le tableau de la Joconde ne permet (heureusement) pas d’appliquer une nouvelle couche de restrictions par dessus une œuvre faisant partie du domaine public. Bonne continuation ! Ariadacapo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Merci pour ce délai qui sera probablement nécessaire car la juriste qui s'occupe du programme est en vacances. Comme je le disais au responsable du programme, ce serait dommage qu'un tel nouveau projet assez inédit n'ait pas la moindre illustration. D'autant plus q'elle a déjà été reprise dans la presse, mais évidemment avec le statut de copyright Thales, comme c'est le cas pour l'annonce de sa conférence dans le blog 3AF. Je pouvais dire aussi que c'est moi qui avait pris la photo avec mon smartphone pendant ladite conférence, avec l'accord du conférencier?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour; merci pour votre prise de contact. J’ai changé le statut de l’image en attendant la réponse. Cela nous laisse un peu plus de 7 jours. Bonne continuation ! Ariadacapo (talk) 13:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:2016-03-08 NiceMatin Wattrelos.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gyrostat (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- J'ai posé une demande d'autorisation dans la liste des requêtes.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Guy lebegue 2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Randykitty (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Gallery
[edit]Bonjour M. I see that you made a gallery on Guy Lebègue. We delete single-item galleries. Therefore please add other photos there. You have contributed more than a hundred beautiful pics here; you can make a gallery that will not be deleted. Au revoir. --E4024 (talk) 13:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Je tiens compte de votre remarque et je déplace les photos dans des sous-galeries adéquates.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 13:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Guy Lebègue has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Guy.lebegue 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Randykitty (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Guy.lebegue 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Randykitty (talk) 08:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EDM module being installed at the top of the TGO node full image 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Majora (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Benjamin Levy.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Benjamin Levy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Benjamin Levy.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- J'ai envoyé le mail à Permission. Please ne pas supprimer la photo. Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 08:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Prisca coquelicot 16.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Prisca coquelicot 16.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Prisca coquelicot 16.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- J'ai modifié--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 08:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)