User talk:Karlderkahle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Karlderkahle!

-- 10:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, bitte gib noch an, woher die Zeichnung stammt. Du hast das ja nicht am 24. Juli 2013 selbst gezeichnet, oder? Grüße --X-Weinzar (talk) 23:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, erledigt -Karlderkahle (talk) 12:00, 02.08.2013

File:WFL D272 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baumhaus 1750.jpg

[edit]

Hi, es wäre schön, wenn dieser Druck bleiben könnte, es fehlen aber Quellenangabe - oder hast Du das selbst gezeichnet? Außerdem zeigt es nicht das Baumhaus! - wenn es bleibt, muss es neu benannt werden. Und woher hast Du das Jahr? - z.Z. ist es ein schönes, aber völlig nutzloses Bild. Schade --RM Vollmer (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RM Vollmer erledigt, kann wegen mir auch umbenannt werden (da hinten ein Baum und vorne ein Haus zu sehen ist, habe ich sie Baumhaus genannt :-) --Karlderkahle (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woher hast du das genaue Datum des 2. Januar 1835, wenn der Künstler unbekannt ist? -- Discostu (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discostu Weil ich irgendeinen Tag aus dem Jahre 1835 auswählen muss, ohne Tag und Monat geht ja nicht oder? Es ist nur bekannt, dass die Gemälde aus 1835 sind --Karlderkahle (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, nächträglich wieder ausgenommen--Karlderkahle (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Du kannst im Hochladeassistenten, statt den Kalender zu nutzen, auch daneben auf den Stift drücken und dann einen beliebigen Text eingeben. -- Discostu (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ok, danke--Karlderkahle (talk) 13:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Papenius Stolberg St. Martini.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, Mail mit Zustimmung Rechteinhaber an Support-Team gesendet Karlderkahle (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Papelius Dingelstedt - 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Papelius Dingelstedt - 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 10:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, da auf Organ-Index gelöscht, müssen wir die 4 Dateien wohl auch löschen :-( Karlderkahle (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]