User talk:Karel K.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Geitz.jpg and Image:Hus landesklasse.jpg

[edit]
English: Please add an author's name and permission to the image description page. If that isn't possible, the images have to be deleted. Please refer to Commons:Upload/Unknown author or license.
Deutsch: Bitte füge den Bildern den Namen und die Erlaubnis des Autors hinzu. Sollte das nicht möglich sein, müssen die Bilder gelöscht werden. Bitte informiere Dich unter Commons:Upload/de/Autor oder Lizenz unbekannt.

Regards / Grüße --Eva K. tell me about it 12:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hus.jpg

[edit]
English: The image is also published on http://hess-uhrmacherschule.de/ as http://hess-uhrmacherschule.de/bilder/hus_1.jpg. If you are actually the image's author, please send a written permission to OTRS to make clear that the image is no copyright violation. Otherwise the image has to be deleted.
Deutsch: Das Bild wurde auch als http://hess-uhrmacherschule.de/bilder/hus_1.jpg auf http://hess-uhrmacherschule.de/ veröffentlicht. Wenn Du der Bildautor bist, sende bitte eine schriftliche Erlaubnis an OTRS, um klarzustellen, daß das Bild keine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt. Andernfalls muß das Bild gelöscht werden.

Regards / Grüße --Eva K. tell me about it 12:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dgc logo.gif

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Dgc_logo.gif

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dgc_logo.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. How do you turn this on (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Karel K.!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Einpressapparat_00.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Einpressapparat_00.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Karel, wer ist der Herrausgeber des Prospektes und hat dieser einer freien Lizenz zugestimmt? Wenn das Bild von 1950 ist, ist es mit Sicherheit nicht gemeinfrei, die Angegebene Begründung {{PD-old}} mit 70 Jahren p.m.a kann nicht stimmen da 1950+70=2020. --Martin H. (talk) 21:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Božena Němcová 1850

[edit]

Přiznám se, že smysl této editace mi uniká. --Gampe (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timto zpusobem se dostava editovany soubor na prvni misto ve zminene kategorii. --Karel K. (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Abraj_Al_Bait_Towers_Clock

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Abraj_Al_Bait_Towers_Clock has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

84.61.139.62 19:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clocks_in_Saudi_Arabia

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Clocks in Saudi Arabia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

84.61.139.62 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To Karel K.

[edit]
Master Historian of Horology
We'd be lost without you! Thanks, Ghilt (talk) 18:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrétien Édouard Caspari.jpg

[edit]
File:Chrétien Édouard Caspari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stechuhr.JPG

[edit]

Hallo. Diese diff ist nicht ok [1]. Ich habe das Bild in Varaignes aufgenommen und bin nie in Saint-Nicolas d'Aliermont gewesen, kann also nicht prüfen, ob das Gerät auch im dortigen Museum ist. Gruss Traumrune (talk) 21:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es rausgenommen. --Karel K. (talk) 06:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clocks_key

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Clocks_key has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Anonimski (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Episkop 01.jpg

[edit]
Hallo Karel, das Episkop wird in einem Buch von Liesegang beschrieben. Im Bild sind Leitungen für elektrischen Strom sichtbar, die Lampen betrieben haben. Kannst du mehr zu dem Projektor sagen? Oder ist es möglich eine Kopie der entsprechenden Seiten zu mir zu schicken? Ich war lange bei Liesegang und das Jahr der Herstellung möchte ich möglichst genau wissen. Hatte der Projektor nur eine Lampe? Viele Grüße und Danke für eine Antwort --Bomas13 (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Hallo Karel, Das Episkop wurde in dieser Form als "Globoskop" von Liesegang gefertigt, auch mit dem Untersatz zum Andrücken einer Vorlage an die Andruckscheibe. Die Geräte wurden nicht vor 1900 gebaut.     Glühlampenlampen standen erst später zur Verfügung. Also vor 1900 sollte nicht richtig sein. Grüße --Bomas13 (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Karel, Das Episkop wurde in dieser Form als "Globoskop" von Liesegang gefertigt, auch mit dem Untersatz zum Andrücken einer Vorlage an die Andruckscheibe. Die Geräte wurden nicht vor 1900 gebaut. Glühlampenlampen standen erst später zur Verfügung. Also vor 1900 sollte nicht richtig sein. Grüße --Bomas13 (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Karel, genau dieses Bild ist in einer Schrift über die Geschichte von "Liesegang"* vom März 1926. Dort wird dieses Globoskop "die neuere Ausführung" genannt, mit 2 Lampen je 500 W. In der gleichen Schrift ist auch ein Bild des Vorgängermodels mit 4 Lampen, von 1913. Es wird dort weiter ein Kugel-Episkop der Firma Schmidt & Haensch genannt, dort war die Beleuchtung der Vorlage mit einer "Ulbrichtkugel". Wenn ich eine Kopie dieser Schrift über den Nachweis des Globuskop von 1890 haben könnte wäre ich dankbar. (Eine Kopie der Schrift von Liesegang wäre in jedem Fall schön. *Herausgeber: F. P. Liesegang Düsseldorf 1926. Vielen Dank für deine Mühe und Grüße --Bomas13 (talk) 17:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Karel, Die Abbildung "Episkop 01.jpg" ist auch in einer Info über die Firma Liesegang von 1926 zu erkennen. Außerdem ist im Schweizer Patent Nr. 111592 von 1924 diese Ausführung beschrieben. Somit ist sicher: das abgebildete Globoskop wurde nicht vor 1924 gefertigt. Ich werde das Datum ändern in: ca. 1926, nicht vor der Patentanmeldung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Bomas13 (talk) 19:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanislav Sucharda.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Stanislav Sucharda.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pendule

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Pendule has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (talk) 16:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Karel, Episkop 01.jpg Episkop von Eduard Liesegang (um 1890) 1. Ed. Liesegang, Fabrik für Projektionsapparate, Kinematographen und Lichtbilder, Verlag: Wilhelm Raue, Chalottenburg 5, Neue Kantstr. 28, Ausgabe:1926, Seite 28, Seite 33

Nach der Fertigstellung des Hora Apparates wurde sogleich die Anwendung der neuen Projektionsglühlampe auf die episkopische Projektion betrieben. … und sie führten im Jahre 1913 zur Herausgabe des Globoskops. … in zwei Ausführungen, mit 2 und mit 4 Glühlampen. Abbildung mit 4 Lampen, Bemerkung: „Globoskop, altes Modell mit 4 Lampen“ , Seite 33 Abbildung: Globoskop, neues Model, Bemerkung: Exakt gleiche Abbildung wie Wikimedia, Globoskop ca. 1890, File: Episkop 01.jpg 2. Preisliste über Lichtbilder-Apparate, Lichtbilderei GmbH M. Gladbach, Seite 6

Neuheit 1913, Globoscop, Beleuchtung mit 2 oder 4 kräftigen elektrischen Glühlampen, Abbildung mit 2 Lampen 3. Schaja Photo-Mitteilungen Nr.8 September 1924, München, Maximilianstr. 32, Seite 15

Abbildung: Globoskop, neues Model, Bemerkung: Exakt gleiche Abbildung wie Wikimedia, Globoskop ca. 1890, File: Episkop 01.jpg

4. 75 Jahre Ed. Liesegang Düsseldorf, zur Feier ihres 75 jährigen Bestehens am 2. Dezember 1929,

In Fertigung 1929: Globoskop. Das Globoskop ist ein im Jahre 1913 entstandenes Glühlampen-Episkop… ursprünglich mit 4 Stück 100kerzigen Glühlampen ausgestattet.

Zusammenfassung: ca. 1890 wurde bei Liesegang kein Globoskop mit Glühlampen gefertigt. ca.1896 wurde ein Projektor mit Umschaltung von Dia und Epi-Projektion gefertigt. Als Beleuchtung war Kalklicht-Lampe oder Bogenlampe vorgesehen. Der erste Projektor bei Liesegang mit elektrischer Glühlampe war der Typ „Hora“ 1912. In der Abbildung bei Wikimedia ist die Fassung für eine Glühlampe deutlich sichtbar. Das abgebildete Episkop Globoskop kann nicht ca. 1890 gefertigt worden sein. Ziemlich sicher also 1924! Viele Grüße --Bomas13 (talk) 21:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Astronomische_Uhr,_Deutsches_Museum,_Muenchen

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Astronomische Uhr, Deutsches Museum, Muenchen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 10:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Karel_K.&oldid=805801249"