User talk:Kallerna/2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinna mereltä 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI imo, nice composition.--ArildV 10:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view from Laukkaluoto 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkkokauppa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice toy! --Poco a poco 17:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odeon of Kos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hietaniemen uimaranta 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölönlahti 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks rather green, and stitching error needs fixing. Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for review, now fixed. --Kallerna 07:47, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I can't review this currently - the servers are refusing to update thumbnails or the file itself. Mattbuck 11:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Still a bit green I think. Also possibly needs a warp to raise the centre slightly - unsure on that. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC) WB adjusted further. --Kallerna 13:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 16:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Kos 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odeon of Kos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Kos 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kos Knight's Castle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Kos 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done --Rjcastillo 14:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odeon of Kos 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kos Knight's Castle 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orijärven kaivos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Kos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odeon of Kos 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kos 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fish farms near Kalymnos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 08:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery Zia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalymnos sponges 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat and the flag of Greece 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty, but way too much sky. Please crop some off, and sharpen a bit. Mattbuck 08:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment Cropped and sharpened. --Kallerna 10:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC) Still a bit much sky, but ok. Mattbuck 11:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saariston rengastie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saariston rengastie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a small CW tilt.--ArildV 13:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment According to my photoshop there's no tilt. Could you maybe do the changes? --Kallerna 17:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC) I was wrong, the ferry was tilted and not the image.--ArildV 20:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saariston rengastie 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saariston rengastie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Therma Kos 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not brilliant but ok. --Mattbuck 11:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurofestival graffiti 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turun päivän ilotulitus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. Mattbuck 10:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokoinranta 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Possibly a bit green on the left, but generally ok. --Mattbuck 23:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm from Globen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orijärven kaivos 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orijärven kaivos 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Kos 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Yhteyskysely

Miten saa yhteyden kuvaajaan valokuvien käyttöoikeuksien ostamiseksi?

Saat yhteyden kuvaajaan täältä tai s-postilla käyttämällä "Email this user"-linkkiä. —kallerna™ 19:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I use some of your photos

Hello Kallerna!

I have some photos of Gulo gulo and Equus hemionus from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33117

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=36050

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia (In your profile there is a link to your flickr gallery):

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Kallerna

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that they use very few...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Mamen%20Jim%E9nez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

Fernando.lison (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Fernando.lison (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Föri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Föri 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I am using a photo of yours

Hello,

I want to use your asphalt conrete photo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asphalt_concrete.JPG for a design for my collegiate acappella group's cd album design. I intend on altering the image. You are a very talented photographer, thank you very much!

De-adminship warning

Dear Kallerna/2013. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 08:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Säkylänharjun kuva

Kuvasi Säkylänharjun alueelta on hieno ja alueen erityispiirteitä korostava. Sikäli jos tunnistan kuvaamispaikan oikein, se on otettu varuskunnan pysyvästi suljetulta ampuma-alueelta. En epäile kuvan ottajan eksyneen alueelle ilman lupaa, mutta haluan korostaa kaikille muille ampuma-alueella liikkumisen olevan luvanvaraista ja luvattomana hengenvaarallista. --84.230.27.159 16:47, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdansk view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but please, add more categories, the galeon e.g. is called Czarna Perła (ship, 1974) --Poco a poco 19:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdansk Westerplatte 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Poistettu kuvasi

Moi, huomastiko kuvasi File:Moominworld gate.jpg on poistettu. Meniköhän ihan oikein, jos se oli yleiskuva sisäänkäynnistä? –Makele-90 (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Moi, ei ollut minun lataamani kuva, vaan käyttäjä Panekin. Poiston oikeudenmukaisuuteen en ota kantaa, en tunne lakipykäliä kyllin hyvin (yleiskuvasta oli kyllä kysymys). —kallerna™ 12:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection.--Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Russian Standard Vodka.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)