User talk:Kai3952/Archive 8
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User talk page length
Hi! I see that the length of this talk page is becoming quite long. It is rather difficult to navigate & edit, and will soon include too many templates such that MediaWiki can't handle displaying it, causing inclusion in Category:User talk pages where template include size is exceeded and a situation in which templates do not not work at the bottom. Some old browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kB. Please archive this talk page in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. You can do this automatically with ArchiverBot, and to quickly use a standard setup for ArchiverBot, simply place "{{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}}" at the top of your user talk page. If you don't setup archiving, someone will when that happens. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Because I'm considering to archive it in another way.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 year
![]() |
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 year for the following reason: Producing more drama after the previous block.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
Mys_721tx (talk) 09:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
I fully understand why the admin did so. I willing to delete all photos I took and never upload the content for a HOST violation ever again (of course the other 2,000+ photos will not continue to upload). When unblocked, I will delete the photos as soon as possible. I need to learn a lesson to avoid making the same mistake again. So I give up my defense/explanation and accept the block for one year.--Kai3952 (talk) 07:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Mys_721tx,既然選擇不理我,卻還要對我封鎖,而且封鎖理由是拿三個月前的事,行跡相當明顯,封鎖理由只是藉口,目的是為了你自己。可是你不理人,我的腦袋並不是你的腦袋,怎麼可能會知道你在想什麼,更不用說你不想被我打擾,這一點你完全沒有顧及到。因此,在沒有告訴我情況下,你直接封鎖我是不合理的。我知道你的封鎖是有前例可循,就像User:AT,將我的求助看成是騷擾。不過,你都不理人了,我有問題也不會問你了,因為我之前我根本不知道你是這種人。你的封鎖果然驗證我的話:「對commons而言不是好事」。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
特別是我等你25天,這25天並沒有頻繁找你,其中第二次詢問距離第一次相隔21天,我今天是第三次找你,結果你是在幾小時之後才封鎖我,況且前二次都是在討論User:黃紀翔,你前二次都沒有回應。由此可知,你真的很可怕,因為前面有過一次被你封鎖,現在我又被你封鎖,似乎只要我找你,你就會封鎖我,現在才明白你對我的敵意居然存在這麼久了。反正,我在第三次時,我有說不會找你,現在你封鎖我,更加證明你對我的確有敵意,但我無可奈何,誰叫大家選你當管理員,我只能被你惡整。解封之後,我還是會繼續推動正事(討論User:黃紀翔),只不過你是拿你的權力顧自己,所以我還是堅持完成對commons有幫助的事,你的封鎖阻止不了我的堅持。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
還有一種可能,你是用封鎖來告訴我,你是站在Reke相同的立場,目的是要我停止對任何人的照片版權審查。如果是這個可能,按照Reke說法,別人在這一點做得比我好很多,相較之下,我的確不適合對別人的照片審查版權。然而,commons社群都鼓勵我用積極的態度才是對commons有幫助,所以我才抱著學習的態度找你請教照片的版權問題。從這裡來看,你的封鎖的確是會讓我怯步,甚至我會覺得不應該堅持。我不知道你會不會在意別人散播關於你的事情。假如封鎖目的真的是為了阻止我審查照片的版權,我只能找別人求助,然後說前面的原因,後面的結果,但是不會斷言你封鎖的動機是出於你個人,那麼別人怎麼看你,是否會信任你,這不是我能控制的,因為我只是憑事實去說,唯一問題是他們看不懂中文。因此,我必須先向你說明,同時先向你說聲:「抱歉」--Kai3952 (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
To all administrators:
- To my surprise, I found clear evidence of offensive statements. At that time I said to him:, "我將來也不會再找他幫忙" (translated into English as: "I won t ask him for help in the future").--Kai3952 (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Judging from his interaction with me (often without a response for a few weeks), this block actions seems to "imply" that he does not want to be harassed by me. If so, I apologize for my actions and promise that it won't happen again. I stared at my promise with determination, confident in my future because I can always find the right person when I need assistance and what type of help I require. From now on I will stay away from his talk page.--Kai3952 (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Kai, all the interactions I have seen with you and a variety of other editors have followed the same pattern: you make accusations about others (often on other wikipedias, far outside Commons' remit) and how badly they treat you. Then you receive a slight degree of support here, because most editors simply want other editors to have an easy time editing here, but then you turn on them and accuse them of the same sort of (unevidenced) harrassment. As a result, there's simply no-one left who cares whether you're blocked or not. No-one is still that concerned as to see you unblocked: you have alienated all the editors who might have supported you.
- Yes, this is probably unfair. But we're here with responsibilities towards ourselves, and towards the goals of the project. It would need someone exceptionally altruistic to still be bothered to argue your case, and I doubt that there is anyone left. You have burned all of your bridges. You have driven away all of those who might have supported you. But this is not our problem – Wikimedia doesn't have a "right" for you to edit here, and if that's the way you behave, then that's the way you end up being treated. I am sorry about this, but not much. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I am wrong. If this is the only problem, then as long as I can change my interactions with other editors and move for the better, no one cares what I've done in the past. What do you suggest I do about it?--Kai3952 (talk) 02:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might be better asking Mys_721tx that, as the blocking admin. But the point would be to ask, and then listen to the answer. So far your reaction has always been to tell other people how wrong they are in their behaviour towards you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I am wrong. If this is the only problem, then as long as I can change my interactions with other editors and move for the better, no one cares what I've done in the past. What do you suggest I do about it?--Kai3952 (talk) 02:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry for offending you. Maybe it's my tone that makes it look bad. Honestly, I've promise that I will stay away from Mys_721tx, so I can't to ask him. The upside to this is that it would definitely not let I have the chance to harass him anymore. But I won't forget your suggestion. I really appreciate your suggestion and your words. --Kai3952 (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: I am very sorry about this mistake but I think you need to know what the UCoC says in the email. Because the UCoC is suspicious of this block, Polda18's talk page and AN/U, both involve the same dispute: To discuss that the same alleged HOST violation. However, out of respect for the Commons community, their suggestion is: "To work with the Commons community on this matter, through their available community process where you may lodge a dispute in the village pump." That is to say, all the evidence points to my HOST violation, and intimidation/harassment is "not" the real reason for this block. As per this point, I need to reach consensus with an admin. That's why you need to verify email authenticity.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)