User talk:KWa
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:Moholynagy.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Moholynagy.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 14:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Douvaine Sirene.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
A.J. 09:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Piscator Autogramm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Patrícia msg 21:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't enter Wikimedia Commons in a while and was not able to comment on the deletion request in time. Sorry for that. --KWa (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Piscator-Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hallo KWa, ich finde es gut, wenn eine Marke genommen wird, auf der das Gesicht nicht durchstempelt ist. Allerdings ist die Auflösung Deiner Marke deutlich schlechter. Besitzt du sie und könntest du sie dann ggf. einfach in einer höheren Auflösung scannen? Sonst würde ich doch zwei verschiedene Dateien vorschlagen - eine mit besserer Auflösung und eine mit besserer Stempellage. --Paulae (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo Paulae, vielleicht war ich etwas voreilig. Gestern hatte mir ein Doors-Kenner das Briefmarken-Scan mit der Bitte um Austausch zusgesandt. Er wollte das Detail mit dem Stempel auf dem Gesicht beheben. Ich kann es deshalb leider nicht selbst ändern. Bei deinem Scan haben die Farben deutlich stärker geleuchtet. Ich bitte SK49 einmal, ein Scan mit höherer Auflösung zu erstellen. Wenn du das Ergebnis meiner Nachfrage nicht abwarten willst, kannst du gern einen Revert vornehmen und deine Fassung wiederherstellen (ich lade dann ggf. später eine zweite Fassung separat hoch). Gruß --KWa (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Als miniatur-Ansicht geht es, deswegen ist ein Revert eher übertrieben. Da das Bild sozusagen der Header des Lesenswert-Artikels de:Jim Morrison ist, wäre bloß eine bessere Auflösung wünschenswert. Der Kontrast könnte noch ein bisschen erhöht werden, aber wenn du schon eine bessere Variante angekurbelt hast, ist es ja gut. Habe leider auch nur die eine Marke, sonst hätte ich es selbst verbessert. Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- SK49 hat geschrieben, dass er auch eine Briefmarke ohne Stempel hat, die er gern in hoher Auflösung einscannen kann. Vielleicht ergibt das eine gute Lösung? Das würde allerdings noch einige Tage dauern. Wir können ja einmal schauen, ob dies Scan eine gute Wirkung ergibt. --KWa (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Das wäre noch besser bzw. sogar ideal! --Paulae (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- SK49 hat geschrieben, dass er auch eine Briefmarke ohne Stempel hat, die er gern in hoher Auflösung einscannen kann. Vielleicht ergibt das eine gute Lösung? Das würde allerdings noch einige Tage dauern. Wir können ja einmal schauen, ob dies Scan eine gute Wirkung ergibt. --KWa (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Als miniatur-Ansicht geht es, deswegen ist ein Revert eher übertrieben. Da das Bild sozusagen der Header des Lesenswert-Artikels de:Jim Morrison ist, wäre bloß eine bessere Auflösung wünschenswert. Der Kontrast könnte noch ein bisschen erhöht werden, aber wenn du schon eine bessere Variante angekurbelt hast, ist es ja gut. Habe leider auch nur die eine Marke, sonst hätte ich es selbst verbessert. Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Es gibt eine leicht überarbeitete Version deines Fotos von M. Wintermantel. Vielleicht willst du das Foto ja austauschen? Gruß und zwar hier: [1] 125.162.47.86 02:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für deine Überarbeitung. Leider bin ich beim Fotografieren nicht näher herangekommen, aber zumindest farblich sieht das Bild nun doch deutlich besser aus. Austausch ist in Ordnung. --KWa (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 07:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have done so. --KWa (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vernissage der Ausstellung „Zwei Mal - Erwin Piscator und die Volksbühne“.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vernissage der Ausstellung „Zwei Mal - Erwin Piscator und die Volksbühne“.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have added the license (I had already chosen one, but somehow it was not saved). --KWa (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:War and Peace at Erwin Piscator Conference 2018.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:War and Peace at Erwin Piscator Conference 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Komarof (talk) 19:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your hint. The conference organiser sent me the photo a few years ago in order to publish it on adequate platforms such as Wikimedia Commons. I will try to get hold of him in order to have him fill out the Release Wizard. But as you know, communication to that part of the globe has become increasingly difficult due to "Jedinaja Rossija"'s anachronistic geopolitical agenda. Therefore, I cannot promise that it will succeed. --KWa (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- It is with some astonishment that I perceive that facts have already been created. It would have taken a little more time to organise the consent of the photographer with the busy Russian colleague who had already agreed in principle to take care, especially for someone who cannot be active 24/7 in Commons at the moment. This kind of hurry-up procedure is anything but conducive to a constructive working culture on Commons. --KWa (talk) 22:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)